It is silly because the entire game matters not just crunch time. Dybantsa poured it on late with his team down big and brought them back. Credit to him he’s a hell of a talent.It's not silly. Dybansta sucked in the first half, but he "hit some shots to claw back into the game late", when it counted and the game was on the line he played great. As I've said before when the pressure was on in the second half yukons senior leader chose to not show up.
And exactly how many shots did he take last night against AU?
Karaban still played a great game. If you’re insinuating that he has to take over and deliver in crunch time of every game to get props, I’d disagree. Silas is their primary ball handler and will have the ball a ton. Reed is their best player and probably their best bet to get a good look on a post up later in games. Ball is another high level scorer who demands shots. That’s before getting into any of their other guys. There’s a lot of mouths to feed on that offense. Every game isn’t going to be the “Karaban game” in crunch time. Now last night sure you can say he didn’t deliver when needed with a guy like Reed out, but this season is very young and we have a large body of work with Karaban now. I don’t think it’s that big of a deal
Like usual, he will have his games where he delivers and have his games where he’s quiet. If him not being clutch was some sort of recurring theme, I’d understand the critique, but he’s shown the ability to hit several late shots for UConn. Last year included I recall a few, including one against Marquette who were obviously ranked

