beast of the east
Active member
RedmanMike post=448823 said:Not sure how this turned into a Lavin/Mullin thread, but here's my two cents - which I said at the time.
Lavin had three 20-win seasons - two with his own players. I expect that his last two teams, which won 20 and 21 games (I believe) is where we would have been with him most years. The most talented of those two teams missed the Dance, a huge underperformance in my opinion. Lavin was a good face of the program, good with the media, and on the whole he recruited well (although he took some chances at the end). Had he been extended, it would not have been the worst decision.
Let's say most years with Lavin would have been around 20 to 22 wins, on the bubble, make the Dance a fair amount and never be a factor. Is that terrible? Say a 21-11 record most years and around .500 in the Big East and we're seeded between 8-10. We rarely win a game in the Dance.
Let's be fair - that's not terrible. We'd probably all take that kind of record for this season the way things look right now.
But it's not great either. I think the St. John's powers that be felt that they could do better. They obviously felt that bringing back Chris Mullin, the Crown Prince of St. John's basketball, could spark a renaissance and get us where we want to go.
I'll admit that I was excited to have Mullin come back as coach. I'm a total Mullin fanboy - since I was playing HS hoops on Long Island while Mullin was at St. John's. He was the man, pure and simple.
It didn't work out for him at St. John's - for a number of reasons which have been well documented.
In my opinion, we now have a coach who is far better than both Lavin and Mullin - so things probably ended up working up the way they should have.
Both the Lavin and Mullin hire generated a lot of interest and spiked ticket sales right away. Lavin's first season got us a decent bump in season ticket sales before we 0layed our first game, and Mullin's presser at CA drew about 2500 people alone. CMA was virtually unknown in New York and not on our radar until referred to sju during the search. No question we are in better hands with CMA as coach but his presence won't attract fans the way Lavin and Mullin did.
That's not to suggest that either should have been retained but makes the CMA years a costlier proposition in that respect.
Last edited: