All Realignment Talk Here

We really need to disband the BE...with all the garbage coming in (Tulane/SMU/UCF/ECU) we become a joke in basketball. IMO if we got the basketball schools all together to start our own conference and name it the Big East (current big east would have to be renamed), we could remain a major conference. Xavier, SJ, SH, Prov, G'Town, Nova, Temple, Memphis, Butler, VCU, etc. is a very strong conference and I think most of us would be very satisfied with that. At the very least we get 4 bids per year and some years as many as 5 might be ranked. Really not that drastically different than the old Big East in terms of NCAA bids and ranked teams. What we lose are the top 10 types of teams, but we can still have the 17-25's in that conference. Why is this not being done? I know we have no leverage in this, but if I were SJ I would go to the ACC, say "Look, I know you are busy with all these football schools, but are you willing to take us or not?" if they say no then we go and start that basketball conference and if they say yes hopefully we get an invite. It's time to do something instead of just sitting there thrown around by currents like seaweed. If we make this hypothetical conference for basketball, I know it sounds nuts, but it might end up being almost as successful as the old Big East.

I wouldn't exactly call Tulane and SMU garbage . Tulane was 12-0 one year in the late 1990's and went to a bowl. But I hate football teams . I wouldn't mind Memphis or Temple for a while till we get back on our feet. Xaviier and Butler are a must and we'd have a fine league.
The ACC just got Loiusiville and their already upset with Louisvilles academics . I visited Clemsons football forum and Louisville fans were coming on thanking Clemson and Florida for helping them get into the ACC and in the same discussion the Clemson fans were ripping Louisvilles academics, so you know what we'd face if St. John's joined the ACC.
I just hope the ACC blows up and they all go scrambling around for a spot. Wouldn't it be funny if the ACC lost 6 teams just like that and it was Duke, Louisville, Wake Forest, Boston College, Syracuse and Pitt all by themselves ?

The ACC won't be a major football conference, that should make us all happy.

The whole ACC academics thing is overrated. You really think there is a major difference in student quality between say Clemson and SJ? Is there really that big a difference in quality of students between Virginia Tech and Fairfield? The answer is no. It's just an elitist kind of thing they want to revel in over at the ACC. Academic rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt unless you are hardcore about doing research because that's what most of those schools are for. Put a UMiami student, a Marist student, a Georgia Tech student, a SJ student, a Virginia Tech student, and a Fairfield student, and you won't be able to tell the difference.

SJU grads on average make more money then many ACC grads do . SJU grads make more money then Fordham Grads do and their listed around #30 in the College rankings
SJU is ranked 147 and that's pretty good considering how many universities America has. Louisville was ranked 167 . Foreign students hurt SJU more then they hurt ACC schools.

Correct. SJ has a major foreign population that definitely brings rankings down. Many students are the first in their family to attend college and affirmative action brings in students who wouldn't otherwise be accepted. Other schools are more homogeneous and have more standard requirements across the board. These are just suggestions by the way, I can't say I have any data to back it up but it seems to make sense. When you have such a diverse school, the requirements are lowered to appeal to a much larger demographic. When it comes down to it though, if you take the median Clemson student and the median Fairfield/Marist/Seton Hall/SJ student, you will not see any difference.

SJU has a 45 percent acceptance rate. 55 percent of the students who apply to SJU get rejected.

Another thing to consider, SJU is in NYC and the NYC public school drop out rate is 40 percent.

Also interesting: Williams College (16%), Marist (29%), Vassar (22%), etc. probably have lower acceptance rates than most of the ACC schools. I know selectivity doesn't always tell the whole story i.e the populations applying to Harvard are not the same as those applying to Vassar, but it still shows they are very good schools too. The only difference is the research capability, bigger sports, and name brands. The students are no better.
 
We really need to disband the BE...with all the garbage coming in (Tulane/SMU/UCF/ECU) we become a joke in basketball. IMO if we got the basketball schools all together to start our own conference and name it the Big East (current big east would have to be renamed), we could remain a major conference. Xavier, SJ, SH, Prov, G'Town, Nova, Temple, Memphis, Butler, VCU, etc. is a very strong conference and I think most of us would be very satisfied with that. At the very least we get 4 bids per year and some years as many as 5 might be ranked. Really not that drastically different than the old Big East in terms of NCAA bids and ranked teams. What we lose are the top 10 types of teams, but we can still have the 17-25's in that conference. Why is this not being done? I know we have no leverage in this, but if I were SJ I would go to the ACC, say "Look, I know you are busy with all these football schools, but are you willing to take us or not?" if they say no then we go and start that basketball conference and if they say yes hopefully we get an invite. It's time to do something instead of just sitting there thrown around by currents like seaweed. If we make this hypothetical conference for basketball, I know it sounds nuts, but it might end up being almost as successful as the old Big East.

I wouldn't exactly call Tulane and SMU garbage . Tulane was 12-0 one year in the late 1990's and went to a bowl. But I hate football teams . I wouldn't mind Memphis or Temple for a while till we get back on our feet. Xaviier and Butler are a must and we'd have a fine league.
The ACC just got Loiusiville and their already upset with Louisvilles academics . I visited Clemsons football forum and Louisville fans were coming on thanking Clemson and Florida for helping them get into the ACC and in the same discussion the Clemson fans were ripping Louisvilles academics, so you know what we'd face if St. John's joined the ACC.
I just hope the ACC blows up and they all go scrambling around for a spot. Wouldn't it be funny if the ACC lost 6 teams just like that and it was Duke, Louisville, Wake Forest, Boston College, Syracuse and Pitt all by themselves ?

The ACC won't be a major football conference, that should make us all happy.

The whole ACC academics thing is overrated. You really think there is a major difference in student quality between say Clemson and SJ? Is there really that big a difference in quality of students between Virginia Tech and Fairfield? The answer is no. It's just an elitist kind of thing they want to revel in over at the ACC. Academic rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt unless you are hardcore about doing research because that's what most of those schools are for. Put a UMiami student, a Marist student, a Georgia Tech student, a SJ student, a Virginia Tech student, and a Fairfield student, and you won't be able to tell the difference.

This is highly questionable

How so? The truth is that there is not a significant difference in students who attend those schools in terms of IQ or GPA. If it was comparing Ivy to the A10 maybe I could see. For many of the schools listed such as UMiami and Georgia Tech, it's much easier to get in those schools if you live in state. It's really only crazy competitive outside their states. So tell me, how would you be able to tell from all those students from different colleges all together in 1 room? Name brand schools don't necessarily mean they are smarter or more competitive. It's like buying CVS brand bandaids vs. Johnson&Johnson bandaids...is there really a big difference? No. Would you be able to tell the difference if both were out of packaging? No. It's all stupid elitist garbage. The ACC schools are obviously very good don't get me wrong, but there are tons of schools who have academically strong students who don't choose name brand schools. You do also realize that many schools pay these ranking companies and bribe them to climb rankings right?

Just out of curiosity, what schools are "bribing" U.S.News ???

If you are referring to the US News and World report regarding college rankings., the president of Stanford University wrote a letter to the editor criticizing their report as highly tainted.
 
I sincerely doubt that the ACC will take any school that does not have a FBS football program.

They took Notre Dame without a football commitment other than 5 games per year and no share of ND's football profits. They took Louisville that has a less than stellar academic profile......so, as the ACC goes, $$$ talks. NONE.....let me repeat, NONE of these moves are about academics and ALL are about TV revenue, wherever that may come from. If it means the DC, NYC, New England Market, the ACC would add SJ, Gtown and Uconn in a heartbeat if they lose Fla St, Virginia, Miami or any other schools.
 
I sincerely doubt that the ACC will take any school that does not have a FBS football program.

They took Notre Dame without a football commitment other than 5 games per year and no share of ND's football profits. They took Louisville that has a less than stellar academic profile......so, as the ACC goes, $$$ talks. NONE.....let me repeat, NONE of these moves are about academics and ALL are about TV revenue, wherever that may come from. If it means the DC, NYC, New England Market, the ACC would add SJ, Gtown and Uconn in a heartbeat if they lose Fla St, Virginia, Miami or any other schools.

They'd be foolish not to add SJU, Goergetown, Villanova and UCONN, the football schools would still control the league and they'd be that much better in basketball with bigger markets.
Even though SJU doesn't have a football team, If I see a Big East football game on I watch it for a while and I can't stand football ! I just watch because it's Big East and the same wiould apply to viewers watching ACC games in NY if NY had ACC teams. You know Rutgers and the Big 10 having a presence here is a concern to the ACC.
But they'd only take the BE schools when 6 ACC teams leave.
 
I sincerely doubt that the ACC will take any school that does not have a FBS football program.

They took Notre Dame without a football commitment other than 5 games per year and no share of ND's football profits.

'72.... please sit down because I have some bad news for you...... St.John's is not Notre Dame; St.John's lacks the star and media appeal which Notre Dame has.
 
The ACC took in Notre Dame because when the Irish eventually need a conference for football, the ACC hopes they stay with the ACC. Nothing more, nothing less. It's the reason the Big East took in Notre Dame.

And the gamble is worth it because Notre Dame is Notre Dame.

And the ACC isn't taking Georgetown without a football program. There is a reason that Louisville, Cincy and Uconn were the three finalists. It has nothing to do with basketball.
 
We really need to disband the BE...with all the garbage coming in (Tulane/SMU/UCF/ECU) we become a joke in basketball. IMO if we got the basketball schools all together to start our own conference and name it the Big East (current big east would have to be renamed), we could remain a major conference. Xavier, SJ, SH, Prov, G'Town, Nova, Temple, Memphis, Butler, VCU, etc. is a very strong conference and I think most of us would be very satisfied with that. At the very least we get 4 bids per year and some years as many as 5 might be ranked. Really not that drastically different than the old Big East in terms of NCAA bids and ranked teams. What we lose are the top 10 types of teams, but we can still have the 17-25's in that conference. Why is this not being done? I know we have no leverage in this, but if I were SJ I would go to the ACC, say "Look, I know you are busy with all these football schools, but are you willing to take us or not?" if they say no then we go and start that basketball conference and if they say yes hopefully we get an invite. It's time to do something instead of just sitting there thrown around by currents like seaweed. If we make this hypothetical conference for basketball, I know it sounds nuts, but it might end up being almost as successful as the old Big East.

I wouldn't exactly call Tulane and SMU garbage . Tulane was 12-0 one year in the late 1990's and went to a bowl. But I hate football teams . I wouldn't mind Memphis or Temple for a while till we get back on our feet. Xaviier and Butler are a must and we'd have a fine league.
The ACC just got Loiusiville and their already upset with Louisvilles academics . I visited Clemsons football forum and Louisville fans were coming on thanking Clemson and Florida for helping them get into the ACC and in the same discussion the Clemson fans were ripping Louisvilles academics, so you know what we'd face if St. John's joined the ACC.
I just hope the ACC blows up and they all go scrambling around for a spot. Wouldn't it be funny if the ACC lost 6 teams just like that and it was Duke, Louisville, Wake Forest, Boston College, Syracuse and Pitt all by themselves ?

The ACC won't be a major football conference, that should make us all happy.

The whole ACC academics thing is overrated. You really think there is a major difference in student quality between say Clemson and SJ? Is there really that big a difference in quality of students between Virginia Tech and Fairfield? The answer is no. It's just an elitist kind of thing they want to revel in over at the ACC. Academic rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt unless you are hardcore about doing research because that's what most of those schools are for. Put a UMiami student, a Marist student, a Georgia Tech student, a SJ student, a Virginia Tech student, and a Fairfield student, and you won't be able to tell the difference.

This is highly questionable

How so? The truth is that there is not a significant difference in students who attend those schools in terms of IQ or GPA. If it was comparing Ivy to the A10 maybe I could see. For many of the schools listed such as UMiami and Georgia Tech, it's much easier to get in those schools if you live in state. It's really only crazy competitive outside their states. So tell me, how would you be able to tell from all those students from different colleges all together in 1 room? Name brand schools don't necessarily mean they are smarter or more competitive. It's like buying CVS brand bandaids vs. Johnson&Johnson bandaids...is there really a big difference? No. Would you be able to tell the difference if both were out of packaging? No. It's all stupid elitist garbage. The ACC schools are obviously very good don't get me wrong, but there are tons of schools who have academically strong students who don't choose name brand schools. You do also realize that many schools pay these ranking companies and bribe them to climb rankings right?

Just out of curiosity, what schools are "bribing" U.S.News ???

If you are referring to the US News and World report regarding college rankings., the president of Stanford University wrote a letter to the editor criticizing their report as highly tainted.

Stanford should be No. 1, but because there are no ivy-covered walls on campus they get dropped.
 
We really need to disband the BE...with all the garbage coming in (Tulane/SMU/UCF/ECU) we become a joke in basketball. IMO if we got the basketball schools all together to start our own conference and name it the Big East (current big east would have to be renamed), we could remain a major conference. Xavier, SJ, SH, Prov, G'Town, Nova, Temple, Memphis, Butler, VCU, etc. is a very strong conference and I think most of us would be very satisfied with that. At the very least we get 4 bids per year and some years as many as 5 might be ranked. Really not that drastically different than the old Big East in terms of NCAA bids and ranked teams. What we lose are the top 10 types of teams, but we can still have the 17-25's in that conference. Why is this not being done? I know we have no leverage in this, but if I were SJ I would go to the ACC, say "Look, I know you are busy with all these football schools, but are you willing to take us or not?" if they say no then we go and start that basketball conference and if they say yes hopefully we get an invite. It's time to do something instead of just sitting there thrown around by currents like seaweed. If we make this hypothetical conference for basketball, I know it sounds nuts, but it might end up being almost as successful as the old Big East.

I wouldn't exactly call Tulane and SMU garbage . Tulane was 12-0 one year in the late 1990's and went to a bowl. But I hate football teams . I wouldn't mind Memphis or Temple for a while till we get back on our feet. Xaviier and Butler are a must and we'd have a fine league.
The ACC just got Loiusiville and their already upset with Louisvilles academics . I visited Clemsons football forum and Louisville fans were coming on thanking Clemson and Florida for helping them get into the ACC and in the same discussion the Clemson fans were ripping Louisvilles academics, so you know what we'd face if St. John's joined the ACC.
I just hope the ACC blows up and they all go scrambling around for a spot. Wouldn't it be funny if the ACC lost 6 teams just like that and it was Duke, Louisville, Wake Forest, Boston College, Syracuse and Pitt all by themselves ?

The ACC won't be a major football conference, that should make us all happy.

The whole ACC academics thing is overrated. You really think there is a major difference in student quality between say Clemson and SJ? Is there really that big a difference in quality of students between Virginia Tech and Fairfield? The answer is no. It's just an elitist kind of thing they want to revel in over at the ACC. Academic rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt unless you are hardcore about doing research because that's what most of those schools are for. Put a UMiami student, a Marist student, a Georgia Tech student, a SJ student, a Virginia Tech student, and a Fairfield student, and you won't be able to tell the difference.

This is highly questionable

How so? The truth is that there is not a significant difference in students who attend those schools in terms of IQ or GPA. If it was comparing Ivy to the A10 maybe I could see. For many of the schools listed such as UMiami and Georgia Tech, it's much easier to get in those schools if you live in state. It's really only crazy competitive outside their states. So tell me, how would you be able to tell from all those students from different colleges all together in 1 room? Name brand schools don't necessarily mean they are smarter or more competitive. It's like buying CVS brand bandaids vs. Johnson&Johnson bandaids...is there really a big difference? No. Would you be able to tell the difference if both were out of packaging? No. It's all stupid elitist garbage. The ACC schools are obviously very good don't get me wrong, but there are tons of schools who have academically strong students who don't choose name brand schools. You do also realize that many schools pay these ranking companies and bribe them to climb rankings right?

Just out of curiosity, what schools are "bribing" U.S.News ???

If you are referring to the US News and World report regarding college rankings., the president of Stanford University wrote a letter to the editor criticizing their report as highly tainted.

Stanford should be No. 1, but because there are no ivy-covered walls on campus they get dropped.

The rankings are just dumb. Basically if you are in the top 150 or so, you are already in the top what 5% nationally? There are lots of good schools out there. Stony Brook is a better academic school than some ACC schools or at worst just as good. So is Binghamton and Geneseo. They just don't have huge athletics programs and they aren't as big or as well-known.
 
We really need to disband the BE...with all the garbage coming in (Tulane/SMU/UCF/ECU) we become a joke in basketball. IMO if we got the basketball schools all together to start our own conference and name it the Big East (current big east would have to be renamed), we could remain a major conference. Xavier, SJ, SH, Prov, G'Town, Nova, Temple, Memphis, Butler, VCU, etc. is a very strong conference and I think most of us would be very satisfied with that. At the very least we get 4 bids per year and some years as many as 5 might be ranked. Really not that drastically different than the old Big East in terms of NCAA bids and ranked teams. What we lose are the top 10 types of teams, but we can still have the 17-25's in that conference. Why is this not being done? I know we have no leverage in this, but if I were SJ I would go to the ACC, say "Look, I know you are busy with all these football schools, but are you willing to take us or not?" if they say no then we go and start that basketball conference and if they say yes hopefully we get an invite. It's time to do something instead of just sitting there thrown around by currents like seaweed. If we make this hypothetical conference for basketball, I know it sounds nuts, but it might end up being almost as successful as the old Big East.

I wouldn't exactly call Tulane and SMU garbage . Tulane was 12-0 one year in the late 1990's and went to a bowl. But I hate football teams . I wouldn't mind Memphis or Temple for a while till we get back on our feet. Xaviier and Butler are a must and we'd have a fine league.
The ACC just got Loiusiville and their already upset with Louisvilles academics . I visited Clemsons football forum and Louisville fans were coming on thanking Clemson and Florida for helping them get into the ACC and in the same discussion the Clemson fans were ripping Louisvilles academics, so you know what we'd face if St. John's joined the ACC.
I just hope the ACC blows up and they all go scrambling around for a spot. Wouldn't it be funny if the ACC lost 6 teams just like that and it was Duke, Louisville, Wake Forest, Boston College, Syracuse and Pitt all by themselves ?

The ACC won't be a major football conference, that should make us all happy.

The whole ACC academics thing is overrated. You really think there is a major difference in student quality between say Clemson and SJ? Is there really that big a difference in quality of students between Virginia Tech and Fairfield? The answer is no. It's just an elitist kind of thing they want to revel in over at the ACC. Academic rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt unless you are hardcore about doing research because that's what most of those schools are for. Put a UMiami student, a Marist student, a Georgia Tech student, a SJ student, a Virginia Tech student, and a Fairfield student, and you won't be able to tell the difference.

This is highly questionable

How so? The truth is that there is not a significant difference in students who attend those schools in terms of IQ or GPA. If it was comparing Ivy to the A10 maybe I could see. For many of the schools listed such as UMiami and Georgia Tech, it's much easier to get in those schools if you live in state. It's really only crazy competitive outside their states. So tell me, how would you be able to tell from all those students from different colleges all together in 1 room? Name brand schools don't necessarily mean they are smarter or more competitive. It's like buying CVS brand bandaids vs. Johnson&Johnson bandaids...is there really a big difference? No. Would you be able to tell the difference if both were out of packaging? No. It's all stupid elitist garbage. The ACC schools are obviously very good don't get me wrong, but there are tons of schools who have academically strong students who don't choose name brand schools. You do also realize that many schools pay these ranking companies and bribe them to climb rankings right?

Just out of curiosity, what schools are "bribing" U.S.News ???

If you are referring to the US News and World report regarding college rankings., the president of Stanford University wrote a letter to the editor criticizing their report as highly tainted.

Fair enough. His 1996 letter took exception to the methodology, which is a legitimate point of view.

There was no mention of bribery as Joe3 explicitly stated in his original post as far as I can tell.

http://www.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/president/speeches/961206gcfallow.html
 
We really need to disband the BE...with all the garbage coming in (Tulane/SMU/UCF/ECU) we become a joke in basketball. IMO if we got the basketball schools all together to start our own conference and name it the Big East (current big east would have to be renamed), we could remain a major conference. Xavier, SJ, SH, Prov, G'Town, Nova, Temple, Memphis, Butler, VCU, etc. is a very strong conference and I think most of us would be very satisfied with that. At the very least we get 4 bids per year and some years as many as 5 might be ranked. Really not that drastically different than the old Big East in terms of NCAA bids and ranked teams. What we lose are the top 10 types of teams, but we can still have the 17-25's in that conference. Why is this not being done? I know we have no leverage in this, but if I were SJ I would go to the ACC, say "Look, I know you are busy with all these football schools, but are you willing to take us or not?" if they say no then we go and start that basketball conference and if they say yes hopefully we get an invite. It's time to do something instead of just sitting there thrown around by currents like seaweed. If we make this hypothetical conference for basketball, I know it sounds nuts, but it might end up being almost as successful as the old Big East.

I wouldn't exactly call Tulane and SMU garbage . Tulane was 12-0 one year in the late 1990's and went to a bowl. But I hate football teams . I wouldn't mind Memphis or Temple for a while till we get back on our feet. Xaviier and Butler are a must and we'd have a fine league.
The ACC just got Loiusiville and their already upset with Louisvilles academics . I visited Clemsons football forum and Louisville fans were coming on thanking Clemson and Florida for helping them get into the ACC and in the same discussion the Clemson fans were ripping Louisvilles academics, so you know what we'd face if St. John's joined the ACC.
I just hope the ACC blows up and they all go scrambling around for a spot. Wouldn't it be funny if the ACC lost 6 teams just like that and it was Duke, Louisville, Wake Forest, Boston College, Syracuse and Pitt all by themselves ?

The ACC won't be a major football conference, that should make us all happy.

The whole ACC academics thing is overrated. You really think there is a major difference in student quality between say Clemson and SJ? Is there really that big a difference in quality of students between Virginia Tech and Fairfield? The answer is no. It's just an elitist kind of thing they want to revel in over at the ACC. Academic rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt unless you are hardcore about doing research because that's what most of those schools are for. Put a UMiami student, a Marist student, a Georgia Tech student, a SJ student, a Virginia Tech student, and a Fairfield student, and you won't be able to tell the difference.

This is highly questionable

How so? The truth is that there is not a significant difference in students who attend those schools in terms of IQ or GPA. If it was comparing Ivy to the A10 maybe I could see. For many of the schools listed such as UMiami and Georgia Tech, it's much easier to get in those schools if you live in state. It's really only crazy competitive outside their states. So tell me, how would you be able to tell from all those students from different colleges all together in 1 room? Name brand schools don't necessarily mean they are smarter or more competitive. It's like buying CVS brand bandaids vs. Johnson&Johnson bandaids...is there really a big difference? No. Would you be able to tell the difference if both were out of packaging? No. It's all stupid elitist garbage. The ACC schools are obviously very good don't get me wrong, but there are tons of schools who have academically strong students who don't choose name brand schools. You do also realize that many schools pay these ranking companies and bribe them to climb rankings right?

Just out of curiosity, what schools are "bribing" U.S.News ???

If you are referring to the US News and World report regarding college rankings., the president of Stanford University wrote a letter to the editor criticizing their report as highly tainted.

Fair enough. His 1996 letter took exception to the methodology, which is a legitimate point of view.

There was no mention of bribery as Joe3 explicitly stated in his original post as far as I can tell.

http://www.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/president/speeches/961206gcfallow.html

My entire point was that rankings are elitist and involves connections between administrations and the people who make the rankings. Geneseo, Stony Brook, Marist, Williams College, Vassar, Binghamton, etc. are all very good academic schools full of students just as smart as students at most ACC schools (save for Duke, UNC, etc.). Just because a school is not in the ACC or not well-known doesn't mean its academics aren't top notch. As for SJ, even at 154 or whatever we are ranked, that's out of how many thousands of schools nationally? IMO to even be in those books of the top 350 colleges is an accomplishment in itself. No one will mistake SJ for Harvard, but it's a solid school.
 
We really need to disband the BE...with all the garbage coming in (Tulane/SMU/UCF/ECU) we become a joke in basketball. IMO if we got the basketball schools all together to start our own conference and name it the Big East (current big east would have to be renamed), we could remain a major conference. Xavier, SJ, SH, Prov, G'Town, Nova, Temple, Memphis, Butler, VCU, etc. is a very strong conference and I think most of us would be very satisfied with that. At the very least we get 4 bids per year and some years as many as 5 might be ranked. Really not that drastically different than the old Big East in terms of NCAA bids and ranked teams. What we lose are the top 10 types of teams, but we can still have the 17-25's in that conference. Why is this not being done? I know we have no leverage in this, but if I were SJ I would go to the ACC, say "Look, I know you are busy with all these football schools, but are you willing to take us or not?" if they say no then we go and start that basketball conference and if they say yes hopefully we get an invite. It's time to do something instead of just sitting there thrown around by currents like seaweed. If we make this hypothetical conference for basketball, I know it sounds nuts, but it might end up being almost as successful as the old Big East.

I wouldn't exactly call Tulane and SMU garbage . Tulane was 12-0 one year in the late 1990's and went to a bowl. But I hate football teams . I wouldn't mind Memphis or Temple for a while till we get back on our feet. Xaviier and Butler are a must and we'd have a fine league.
The ACC just got Loiusiville and their already upset with Louisvilles academics . I visited Clemsons football forum and Louisville fans were coming on thanking Clemson and Florida for helping them get into the ACC and in the same discussion the Clemson fans were ripping Louisvilles academics, so you know what we'd face if St. John's joined the ACC.
I just hope the ACC blows up and they all go scrambling around for a spot. Wouldn't it be funny if the ACC lost 6 teams just like that and it was Duke, Louisville, Wake Forest, Boston College, Syracuse and Pitt all by themselves ?

The ACC won't be a major football conference, that should make us all happy.

The whole ACC academics thing is overrated. You really think there is a major difference in student quality between say Clemson and SJ? Is there really that big a difference in quality of students between Virginia Tech and Fairfield? The answer is no. It's just an elitist kind of thing they want to revel in over at the ACC. Academic rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt unless you are hardcore about doing research because that's what most of those schools are for. Put a UMiami student, a Marist student, a Georgia Tech student, a SJ student, a Virginia Tech student, and a Fairfield student, and you won't be able to tell the difference.

This is highly questionable

How so? The truth is that there is not a significant difference in students who attend those schools in terms of IQ or GPA. If it was comparing Ivy to the A10 maybe I could see. For many of the schools listed such as UMiami and Georgia Tech, it's much easier to get in those schools if you live in state. It's really only crazy competitive outside their states. So tell me, how would you be able to tell from all those students from different colleges all together in 1 room? Name brand schools don't necessarily mean they are smarter or more competitive. It's like buying CVS brand bandaids vs. Johnson&Johnson bandaids...is there really a big difference? No. Would you be able to tell the difference if both were out of packaging? No. It's all stupid elitist garbage. The ACC schools are obviously very good don't get me wrong, but there are tons of schools who have academically strong students who don't choose name brand schools. You do also realize that many schools pay these ranking companies and bribe them to climb rankings right?

Just out of curiosity, what schools are "bribing" U.S.News ???

If you are referring to the US News and World report regarding college rankings., the president of Stanford University wrote a letter to the editor criticizing their report as highly tainted.

Fair enough. His 1996 letter took exception to the methodology, which is a legitimate point of view.

There was no mention of bribery as Joe3 explicitly stated in his original post as far as I can tell.

http://www.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/president/speeches/961206gcfallow.html

JSJ, correct regarding the bribery, I do not see the connection. If any it would be more towards lobbying via boosters advertising dollars.
 
I sincerely doubt that the ACC will take any school that does not have a FBS football program.

They took Notre Dame without a football commitment other than 5 games per year and no share of ND's football profits.

'72.... please sit down because I have some bad news for you...... St.John's is not Notre Dame; St.John's lacks the star and media appeal which Notre Dame has.

ND's move to the ACC is baffling. The ACC is still in a state of flux, even with the $50 million exit fee. If they lose Florida State and Clemson to the best football conference in America, the SEC, ND will be left in a very weak football conference....are you sitting James? Yes, even weaker than the Big East! Especially in the money media markets.
ND, has BILLIONS to buy out of the ACC at any time but moving to the ACC is a head-scratcher because the ACC will NOT be one of the 4 football super-conferences that control BCS.

That said, ND's media appeal will do zero for ACC football since they will not be ACC football members and can move their football to the BIG at any time and ND screwed all the NY area alums by abandoning the Big East.

F*ck the Irish!
 
I sincerely doubt that the ACC will take any school that does not have a FBS football program.

They took Notre Dame without a football commitment other than 5 games per year and no share of ND's football profits.

'72.... please sit down because I have some bad news for you...... St.John's is not Notre Dame; St.John's lacks the star and media appeal which Notre Dame has.

ND's move to the ACC is baffling. The ACC is still in a state of flux, even with the $50 million exit fee. If they lose Florida State and Clemson to the best football conference in America, the SEC, ND will be left in a very weak football conference....are you sitting James? Yes, even weaker than the Big East! Especially in the money media markets.
ND, has BILLIONS to buy out of the ACC at any time but moving to the ACC is a head-scratcher because the ACC will NOT be one of the 4 football super-conferences that control BCS.

That said, ND's media appeal will do zero for ACC football since they will not be ACC football members and can move their football to the BIG at any time and ND screwed all the NY area alums by abandoning the Big East.

F*ck the Irish!

http://deadspin.com/5963736/the-hat...dium=recirculation&utm_campaign=recirculation
 
I sincerely doubt that the ACC will take any school that does not have a FBS football program.

They took Notre Dame without a football commitment other than 5 games per year and no share of ND's football profits.

'72.... please sit down because I have some bad news for you...... St.John's is not Notre Dame; St.John's lacks the star and media appeal which Notre Dame has.

ND's move to the ACC is baffling. The ACC is still in a state of flux, even with the $50 million exit fee. If they lose Florida State and Clemson to the best football conference in America, the SEC, ND will be left in a very weak football conference....are you sitting James? Yes, even weaker than the Big East! Especially in the money media markets.
ND, has BILLIONS to buy out of the ACC at any time but moving to the ACC is a head-scratcher because the ACC will NOT be one of the 4 football super-conferences that control BCS.

That said, ND's media appeal will do zero for ACC football since they will not be ACC football members and can move their football to the BIG at any time and ND screwed all the NY area alums by abandoning the Big East.

F*ck the Irish!

Actually they can't move to the BIG at anytime. It was a shrewd move by the ACC.
By signing Notre Dame to play 5 ACC teams every year they essentially guaranteed that ND won't join any of the rival conferences. Not enough room on the schedule.

Couple that with the 5 games, which will bolster ACC football appeal, and it makes sense to me.
Plus, you have a large chunk of the ND alumni base which lives on the eastern seaboard. (Including Florida, don't kid yourself - plenty of ND snowbirds). ND has been playing "neutral" site games in NY and DC for years... they wouldn't have done that if they didn't have fans in those cities. ACC move makes a lot of sense.
 
We really need to disband the BE...with all the garbage coming in (Tulane/SMU/UCF/ECU) we become a joke in basketball. IMO if we got the basketball schools all together to start our own conference and name it the Big East (current big east would have to be renamed), we could remain a major conference. Xavier, SJ, SH, Prov, G'Town, Nova, Temple, Memphis, Butler, VCU, etc. is a very strong conference and I think most of us would be very satisfied with that. At the very least we get 4 bids per year and some years as many as 5 might be ranked. Really not that drastically different than the old Big East in terms of NCAA bids and ranked teams. What we lose are the top 10 types of teams, but we can still have the 17-25's in that conference. Why is this not being done? I know we have no leverage in this, but if I were SJ I would go to the ACC, say "Look, I know you are busy with all these football schools, but are you willing to take us or not?" if they say no then we go and start that basketball conference and if they say yes hopefully we get an invite. It's time to do something instead of just sitting there thrown around by currents like seaweed. If we make this hypothetical conference for basketball, I know it sounds nuts, but it might end up being almost as successful as the old Big East.

I wouldn't exactly call Tulane and SMU garbage . Tulane was 12-0 one year in the late 1990's and went to a bowl. But I hate football teams . I wouldn't mind Memphis or Temple for a while till we get back on our feet. Xaviier and Butler are a must and we'd have a fine league.
The ACC just got Loiusiville and their already upset with Louisvilles academics . I visited Clemsons football forum and Louisville fans were coming on thanking Clemson and Florida for helping them get into the ACC and in the same discussion the Clemson fans were ripping Louisvilles academics, so you know what we'd face if St. John's joined the ACC.
I just hope the ACC blows up and they all go scrambling around for a spot. Wouldn't it be funny if the ACC lost 6 teams just like that and it was Duke, Louisville, Wake Forest, Boston College, Syracuse and Pitt all by themselves ?

The ACC won't be a major football conference, that should make us all happy.

The whole ACC academics thing is overrated. You really think there is a major difference in student quality between say Clemson and SJ? Is there really that big a difference in quality of students between Virginia Tech and Fairfield? The answer is no. It's just an elitist kind of thing they want to revel in over at the ACC. Academic rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt unless you are hardcore about doing research because that's what most of those schools are for. Put a UMiami student, a Marist student, a Georgia Tech student, a SJ student, a Virginia Tech student, and a Fairfield student, and you won't be able to tell the difference.

This is highly questionable

How so? The truth is that there is not a significant difference in students who attend those schools in terms of IQ or GPA. If it was comparing Ivy to the A10 maybe I could see. For many of the schools listed such as UMiami and Georgia Tech, it's much easier to get in those schools if you live in state. It's really only crazy competitive outside their states. So tell me, how would you be able to tell from all those students from different colleges all together in 1 room? Name brand schools don't necessarily mean they are smarter or more competitive. It's like buying CVS brand bandaids vs. Johnson&Johnson bandaids...is there really a big difference? No. Would you be able to tell the difference if both were out of packaging? No. It's all stupid elitist garbage. The ACC schools are obviously very good don't get me wrong, but there are tons of schools who have academically strong students who don't choose name brand schools. You do also realize that many schools pay these ranking companies and bribe them to climb rankings right?

Just out of curiosity, what schools are "bribing" U.S.News ???

If you are referring to the US News and World report regarding college rankings., the president of Stanford University wrote a letter to the editor criticizing their report as highly tainted.

Fair enough. His 1996 letter took exception to the methodology, which is a legitimate point of view.

There was no mention of bribery as Joe3 explicitly stated in his original post as far as I can tell.

http://www.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/president/speeches/961206gcfallow.html

My entire point was that rankings are elitist and involves connections between administrations and the people who make the rankings. Geneseo, Stony Brook, Marist, Williams College, Vassar, Binghamton, etc. are all very good academic schools full of students just as smart as students at most ACC schools (save for Duke, UNC, etc.). Just because a school is not in the ACC or not well-known doesn't mean its academics aren't top notch. As for SJ, even at 154 or whatever we are ranked, that's out of how many thousands of schools nationally? IMO to even be in those books of the top 350 colleges is an accomplishment in itself. No one will mistake SJ for Harvard, but it's a solid school.

Think you are grossly UNDER rating Williams which is the #1 ranked liberal arts school in the country..

In NO WAY should it be mentionedin the same sentence as Stony Brook, Marist, or Geneseo.

The AVERAGE SAT scores for the entering class is 1410 (math and reading) and an acceptance rate of 17%.

Williams IS on a par with Duke.

For those with half a brain, Williams is a very well known school (nation wide), as I hope you would agree.
 
I haven't read all of the prior posts, so I may be essentially repeating someone. I'd love to join the ACC, but I don't think that is likely. I think the next best option is to have the remaining 7 BE schools with no D1 football join with 7 of the A-10 schools to form what seems like a pretty decent basketball league.

St. John’s
Georgetown
Villanova
Marquette
Seton Hall
Providence
Depaul
Xavier
VCU
UMass
Butler
Dayton
St. Joseph’s
Richmond
 
Back
Top