We really need to disband the BE...with all the garbage coming in (Tulane/SMU/UCF/ECU) we become a joke in basketball. IMO if we got the basketball schools all together to start our own conference and name it the Big East (current big east would have to be renamed), we could remain a major conference. Xavier, SJ, SH, Prov, G'Town, Nova, Temple, Memphis, Butler, VCU, etc. is a very strong conference and I think most of us would be very satisfied with that. At the very least we get 4 bids per year and some years as many as 5 might be ranked. Really not that drastically different than the old Big East in terms of NCAA bids and ranked teams. What we lose are the top 10 types of teams, but we can still have the 17-25's in that conference. Why is this not being done? I know we have no leverage in this, but if I were SJ I would go to the ACC, say "Look, I know you are busy with all these football schools, but are you willing to take us or not?" if they say no then we go and start that basketball conference and if they say yes hopefully we get an invite. It's time to do something instead of just sitting there thrown around by currents like seaweed. If we make this hypothetical conference for basketball, I know it sounds nuts, but it might end up being almost as successful as the old Big East.
I wouldn't exactly call Tulane and SMU garbage . Tulane was 12-0 one year in the late 1990's and went to a bowl. But I hate football teams . I wouldn't mind Memphis or Temple for a while till we get back on our feet. Xaviier and Butler are a must and we'd have a fine league.
The ACC just got Loiusiville and their already upset with Louisvilles academics . I visited Clemsons football forum and Louisville fans were coming on thanking Clemson and Florida for helping them get into the ACC and in the same discussion the Clemson fans were ripping Louisvilles academics, so you know what we'd face if St. John's joined the ACC.
I just hope the ACC blows up and they all go scrambling around for a spot. Wouldn't it be funny if the ACC lost 6 teams just like that and it was Duke, Louisville, Wake Forest, Boston College, Syracuse and Pitt all by themselves ?
The ACC won't be a major football conference, that should make us all happy.
The whole ACC academics thing is overrated. You really think there is a major difference in student quality between say Clemson and SJ? Is there really that big a difference in quality of students between Virginia Tech and Fairfield? The answer is no. It's just an elitist kind of thing they want to revel in over at the ACC. Academic rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt unless you are hardcore about doing research because that's what most of those schools are for. Put a UMiami student, a Marist student, a Georgia Tech student, a SJ student, a Virginia Tech student, and a Fairfield student, and you won't be able to tell the difference.
SJU grads on average make more money then many ACC grads do . SJU grads make more money then Fordham Grads do and their listed around #30 in the College rankings
SJU is ranked 147 and that's pretty good considering how many universities America has. Louisville was ranked 167 . Foreign students hurt SJU more then they hurt ACC schools.
Correct. SJ has a major foreign population that definitely brings rankings down. Many students are the first in their family to attend college and affirmative action brings in students who wouldn't otherwise be accepted. Other schools are more homogeneous and have more standard requirements across the board. These are just suggestions by the way, I can't say I have any data to back it up but it seems to make sense. When you have such a diverse school, the requirements are lowered to appeal to a much larger demographic. When it comes down to it though, if you take the median Clemson student and the median Fairfield/Marist/Seton Hall/SJ student, you will not see any difference.
SJU has a 45 percent acceptance rate. 55 percent of the students who apply to SJU get rejected.
Another thing to consider, SJU is in NYC and the NYC public school drop out rate is 40 percent.
Also interesting: Williams College (16%), Marist (29%), Vassar (22%), etc. probably have lower acceptance rates than most of the ACC schools. I know selectivity doesn't always tell the whole story i.e the populations applying to Harvard are not the same as those applying to Vassar, but it still shows they are very good schools too. The only difference is the research capability, bigger sports, and name brands. The students are no better.