Although I do think Jakaar's game is fairly comparable to Mo's I think that Jakaar is missing one key ingredient that really got people talking about Mo and that is a hallmark or signature game. Mo started getting real attention after the 32 point Providence game but his name really took off after he dropped 30 points and grabbed 13 rebounds against a top ten ranked Duke team. I think Jakaar is a great player but I don't think he has had that moment that suddenly makes people stop and really look hard at him. Just my 2 cents (which is probably overvalued by a penny or two)
But that is a direct result of the depth of this year's roster compared to last year, imo. While Harless was a smoother offensive player, I think Sampson would have had a 30 point game this year if we only had 6 guys suiting up. Conversely, Harkless would have had to blend in a lot more this year because of the extra talent.
I also think it is fair to say Harkless would have had less "signature games" but he would be more well rounded player. Not to mention, the team would be in the top 25 and he would be sharing the accolades.
Make no mistake, I am not being critical of Harkless. I really like the kid. He turned away from screwconn and beacme Lavin's linchpin recruit. Without him, who knows about the rest of the class. I am just trying to make a point about Harkless and Sampson.