Westchester Community College issues-

Adam Zagoria
‏@AdamZagoria That WCC transcript story could have implications for Keith Thomas at St. John's & Gio McLean at Quinnipiac.
 
Classic. Front runners for Briscoe, everything looking good. So we were due for some bad news right?
 
Will see how this plays out, but it seems we are cursed. :) Rooting for Johnnies should come with a pension.
 
Classic. Front runners for Briscoe, everything looking good. So we were due for some bad news right?

It's always the case. I wonder what the record is for going without bad news.
 
Classic. Front runners for Briscoe, everything looking good. So we were due for some bad news right?

It's always the case. I wonder what the record is for going without bad news.

You can't make this s - - - up!

They better do their due diligence on this, we don't want to be slapped with a scolarship deduction down the road.
 
Classic. Front runners for Briscoe, everything looking good. So we were due for some bad news right?

It's always the case. I wonder what the record is for going without bad news.

It seems like the Johnnies and Providence are the conference teams who has to deal with some form of issues.

I, like Paultz, will wait to see how this plays out before getting wound up.
 
The other kids transcript reflected many more credits than he actually completed. That could definitely affect Thomas if this asst. coach did the same for him. Did Thomas actually receive an type of degree from this place? This program is cursed!!
 
Maybe we shouldn't speculate about a kid doing wrong when there is zero indication that he has done anything wrong. Guilt by association is terribly unfair.
 
Maybe we shouldn't speculate about a kid doing wrong when there is zero indication that he has done anything wrong. Guilt by association is terribly unfair.

Seriously. Thomas had to earn his spot back on the team by proving it in the classroom first. Also, I'd imagine SJU's compliance is a little more sophisticated than FAMU.
 
Maybe we shouldn't speculate about a kid doing wrong when there is zero indication that he has done anything wrong. Guilt by association is terribly unfair.

A tweet by a basketball writer mentioned that it COULD impact a player on our team. If the same writer wrote something that COULD be a positive for a player on our team or recruit should we also not speculate either? I mean that would only be fair right?
 
Maybe we shouldn't speculate about a kid doing wrong when there is zero indication that he has done anything wrong. Guilt by association is terribly unfair.

A tweet by a basketball writer mentioned that it COULD impact a player on our team. If the same writer wrote something that COULD be a positive for a player on our team or recruit should we also not speculate either? I mean that would only be fair right?

Moose has come back as a villain! This is worse than when Hulk Hogan turned when I was a kid.
 
Maybe we shouldn't speculate about a kid doing wrong when there is zero indication that he has done anything wrong. Guilt by association is terribly unfair.

Seriously. Thomas had to earn his spot back on the team by proving it in the classroom first. Also, I'd imagine SJU's compliance is a little more sophisticated than FAMU.

Not to comment on Thomas at all. However, considering the lack of institutional oversight that allowed Cecilia Chang to steal from the university for decades, and unrelated and unrelated activities which brought down both the university president and his chief of staff, you must be joking about your faith in SJU's compliance. :) Just saying.
 
Maybe we shouldn't speculate about a kid doing wrong when there is zero indication that he has done anything wrong. Guilt by association is terribly unfair.

A tweet by a basketball writer mentioned that it COULD impact a player on our team. If the same writer wrote something that COULD be a positive for a player on our team or recruit should we also not speculate either? I mean that would only be fair right?

No. They are not equal. Once you unfairly associate a person with a shameful act they are branded. Without even getting into simple, common decency, In a court of law one form of falsehood/lie/untruth is called slander and it has legal consequences both civil and criminal. Another form is called "puffing" (exaggerating in a positive way) which is legal in NY state law for example when selling real estate.
 
Maybe we shouldn't speculate about a kid doing wrong when there is zero indication that he has done anything wrong. Guilt by association is terribly unfair.

A tweet by a basketball writer mentioned that it COULD impact a player on our team. If the same writer wrote something that COULD be a positive for a player on our team or recruit should we also not speculate either? I mean that would only be fair right?

No. They are not equal. Once you unfairly associate a person with a shameful act they are branded. Without even getting into simple, common decency, In a court of law one form of falsehood/lie/untruth is called slander and it has legal consequences both civil and criminal. Another form is called "puffing" (exaggerating in a positive way) which is legal in NY state law for example when selling real estate.

Are any of us posting here Adam Zagoria? He 'branded' the name saying it COULD have an impact. So are you saying we can't speculate about it? But good to know the army of lawyers here can help out Thomas when he slams Zags with a slander suit :)
 
Back
Top