Valarie Ackerman new BE Commissioner

...And this is a good time to reiterate that the comments made on this forum reflect the views of their original poster and any and all disclaimers standard or otherwise apply. Comments may be used to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. The creation of straw men to argue against things neither said nor implied as well as the repetition of previously discredited memes is common as is the steering of the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions.

Further on for what so shall be known henceforth and in perpetuity as the joe3 clause, all comments of Joe3, aka ressurection of joe, aka redmencomsucks, aka pleasedontbanmeagain, aka joemama, aka jose3, aka Iwillneverposthereagain, aka vivamexico!, aka gloriasteinMAN, aka IamNOTjoe3, aka joes'snicebrother, aka joe3ImSoberNow, aka thistimeIreallywon'teverposthereagain, aka josejosejimenez, aka bongwaterscienceexperiment, aka i'vechangedmymindagainandnowiwillsettherecordfornumberofpostsandforlongestusername(s),
and all other aliases whether they be created under the influence of alcohol, illegal drugs, or mild altering prescription medication, or actual alternate personality from a medically recognized condition, shall be the sole opinion of joe3 whether he be a real human being, fictional character, illegal alien, area 51 alien, great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jelly, south american tinhorn dictator, or mad scientist. If joe3 or any of the iterations of the joe3 entity be a exposed in her real identity as the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo, the joe3 clause will retain all of its potency and will not require being renamed to the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo Clause.

My vote for Post of the Year! Is Paul eligible to win an award?

I named a softball league a long time ago that I started for my friends and I after myself and a member here has a football stadium named after his father so I dont see why Paul wouldnt be eligble for post of the year. Heck we can name the award after him also.

Just a bit of trivia (?): The greatest pitcher to never win the Cy Young award?

Answer: Cy Young
:) :) :) :)
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...agree-to-become-commissioner-of-big-east.html

Val Ackerman Said to Agree to Become Big East Commissioner

Val Ackerman has agreed to become commissioner of the Big East conference, adding to a basketball-heavy resume that includes being the first president of the Women’s National Basketball Association, a person with direct knowledge of the hiring said.
The 53-year-old Ackerman was chosen by the presidents of the conference’s 10 universities, according to the person, who requested anonymity because the contract hasn’t been signed.
Other female conference commissioners include Bernadette McGlade of the Atlantic 10 and Robin Harris, executive director of the Ivy League.
NBA Commissioner David Stern, who appointed Ackerman to start up the women’s league, praised her choice as conference chief.
“She brings all of that experience with intelligence, a keen analytical ability, an intense work ethic and a winning management style,” Stern said in an e-mail.
Ackerman didn’t immediately return an e-mail or voice message at home seeking comment on the Big East job.
The Big East is set to begin business in its new form in six days. It is comprised largely of Catholic colleges and universities from the old Big East, which is now called the American Athletic Conference.
Basketball Focus
The league, which retained the rights to the Big East name, includes the so-called Catholic 7, whose presidents voted to leave because they said football-related revenue was becoming too important. The Big East started in 1979 with a focus on basketball.
The holdover schools are Georgetown, St. John’s, Villanova, Seton Hall, Providence, Marquette and DePaul. They are joined by Butler, Creighton and Xavier.
Ackerman ran the WNBA from 1996 to 2005, when she stepped down. She was a staff attorney for the NBA, according to ESPN, and served as the first female president of USA Basketball from 2005 to 2008. She’s a member of the Basketball Hall of Fame board of trustees.
A basketball player at the University of Virginia prior to getting her law degree at UCLA, Ackerman released a report this month commissioned by the National Collegiate Athletic Association on the state of women’s basketball and possible changes the sport could make to improve popularity and efficiency.
Female Roster
Linda Bruno was the first female commissioner of a major college conference, serving as head of the Atlantic 10 from 1994 to 2008, and was replaced by McGlade. Carolyn Schlie Femovich has been commissioner of the Patriot League since 1999 and Brenda Weare led the Northeast Conference from 2006 until her death in 2009. In 2011, Amy Huchthausen was named commissioner of the America East, and Harris has led the Ivy League since 2009.
“It’ll be great to have another female join the commissioner ranks, but first and foremost, her extensive leadership experience and accomplishments give her a perspective that will position the Big East for continued success,” Huchthausen, a former Big East intern, said in an e-mail.
The Big East signed a 12-year television contract this year with Fox Sports, a unit of News Corp. (NWSA) The league has also agreed to play its season-ending men’s basketball tournament at Madison Square Garden in New York for the next three years.
 
We have a contract with MSG for 12 years. Probably just an inaccuracy, because we have agreed legally to play there for 12 years, not 3.
 
She suggested lowering the rim for women's hoops and reducing physicality even more. Doing that would probably result in feminists protesting because they want to be seen as the same as men. I don't think that's what will improve attendance for women's hoops, I think the reason it's low is simple: it's not as entertaining because it's not the top level of hoops out there. Having guys flying through the air dunking is always going to be flashier than a layup. Having 7 footers sending shots into the seats is always going to be flashier than a 5'10 woman doing the same. It's just how it is.
 
She suggested lowering the rim for women's hoops and reducing physicality even more. .

What's the difference between that and baseball teams like my mets bringing in the fences so there are more home runs
 
She suggested lowering the rim for women's hoops and reducing physicality even more. Doing that would probably result in feminists protesting because they want to be seen as the same as men. I don't think that's what will improve attendance for women's hoops, I think the reason it's low is simple: it's not as entertaining because it's not the top level of hoops out there. Having guys flying through the air dunking is always going to be flashier than a layup. Having 7 footers sending shots into the seats is always going to be flashier than a 5'10 woman doing the same. It's just how it is.

So college hoops aren't as exciting as the pros because it's not the top level? I mean it's so much better watching teams full of 6'8" guys dunking than small guys like Dwight Hardy draining 3's right?
 
She suggested lowering the rim for women's hoops and reducing physicality even more. Doing that would probably result in feminists protesting because they want to be seen as the same as men. I don't think that's what will improve attendance for women's hoops, I think the reason it's low is simple: it's not as entertaining because it's not the top level of hoops out there. Having guys flying through the air dunking is always going to be flashier than a layup. Having 7 footers sending shots into the seats is always going to be flashier than a 5'10 woman doing the same. It's just how it is.

So college hoops aren't as exciting as the pros because it's not the top level? I mean it's so much better watching teams full of 6'8" guys dunking than small guys like Dwight Hardy draining 3's right?

The talent gap is much closer from major conference D-1 men's college basketball to the NBA than from the WNBA or women's college hoops to the NBA. At the high major college level for men you will still see many of the same things you see in the NBA. Deep 3's, high-flying dunks, insane blocks, and amazing athleticism. Don't get me wrong, I actually pay attention to women's college basketball, but not nearly the same as I do men's. By the way don't say there's a massive gap between high major men's college hoops and the NBA, because you have freshmen 1 and done's making instant impacts like our very own Harkless. Within gender is a much smaller difference than across gender when regarding sports. I don't understand why it's so taboo to just admit men are much better athletes on average. Of course you will get those awesome women athletes like the Williams sisters in tennis, Danica Patrick in Nascar, or Britney Griner in women's hoops, but those are every once in a blue moon and even the best women athletes often cannot come close to many average male athletes. That's the real reason a major discrepancy exists among sports viewership. It's not the same as the AAA and major leagues, because those both involve the same gender and high level talent not too far away from each other. Same with major college hoops for men vs. NBA.
 
She suggested lowering the rim for women's hoops and reducing physicality even more. Doing that would probably result in feminists protesting because they want to be seen as the same as men. I don't think that's what will improve attendance for women's hoops, I think the reason it's low is simple: it's not as entertaining because it's not the top level of hoops out there. Having guys flying through the air dunking is always going to be flashier than a layup. Having 7 footers sending shots into the seats is always going to be flashier than a 5'10 woman doing the same. It's just how it is.

So college hoops aren't as exciting as the pros because it's not the top level? I mean it's so much better watching teams full of 6'8" guys dunking than small guys like Dwight Hardy draining 3's right?

The talent gap is much closer from major conference D-1 men's college basketball to the NBA than from the WNBA or women's college hoops to the NBA. At the high major college level for men you will still see many of the same things you see in the NBA. Deep 3's, high-flying dunks, insane blocks, and amazing athleticism. Don't get me wrong, I actually pay attention to women's college basketball, but not nearly the same as I do men's. By the way don't say there's a massive gap between high major men's college hoops and the NBA, because you have freshmen 1 and done's making instant impacts like our very own Harkless. Within gender is a much smaller difference than across gender when regarding sports. I don't understand why it's so taboo to just admit men are much better athletes on average. Of course you will get those awesome women athletes like the Williams sisters in tennis, Danica Patrick in Nascar, or Britney Griner in women's hoops, but those are every once in a blue moon and even the best women athletes often cannot come close to many average male athletes. That's the real reason a major discrepancy exists among sports viewership. It's not the same as the AAA and major leagues, because those both involve the same gender and high level talent not too far away from each other. Same with major college hoops for men vs. NBA.

While I casually disagree with most of what you've said in this thread you're obviously too much of a neanderthal to bother debating gender equality with. However, I have to vehemently disagree with two assertions, first that anyone thinks the women's game will as exciting or popular as the NBA. No one has said anything of the sort. Ackerman's recommendations were purely to improve the product, make the game more fun to watch and maybe generate more viewers and more revenue while attracting more players at the grass roots level. No one expects the Sparks to become the Lakers. Second, car drivers aren't atheletes.
 
Back
Top