Valarie Ackerman new BE Commissioner

In general I'm not a male chauvinist but when it comes to the leadership of the BE, at a crucial time no less, I'm going to have to take that position. I want a person with cojones and I mean that in the literal sense. Get someone who is savvy and won't be wreckless when it's the wrong time of the month.

Tell you the truth, no man can be as ruthless as a strong woman leader. Women aren't lead around by their cojones, and that is often a good thing. Ackerman seems like a terrific choice, and women are much more level headed and less reckless than men overall IMO.

Has realfan stolen your password?

You talking to me or sirvoo? Because the first paragraph in what you quoted was his, not mine.



[video width=425 height=344 type=youtube]http://youtu.be/SKkMkodo4MI[/video]
 
You talking to me or sirvoo? Because the first paragraph in what you quoted was his, not mine.

As a married man you need to steer as clear away from ownership of that comment as possible!

And this is a good time to reiterate that the comments made on this forum reflect the views of their original poster and any and all disclaimers standard or otherwise apply. Comments may be used to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. The creation of straw men to argue against things neither said nor implied as well as the repetition of previously discredited memes is common as is the steering of the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions.

This report has been prepared by the division, group, subsidiary or affiliate of UBS AG ("UBS") identified herein. In certain countries UBS AG is referred to as UBS SA, which is a translation of UBS AG, its registered legal name. UBS Warburg is a business group of UBS AG. This report is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law, including the following: This report has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. The report is published solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. The securities described herein may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. The report is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed as being accurate, nor is it a complete statement or summary of the securities, marketsor developments referred to in the report. The report should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgement. Any opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice and UBS is not under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. UBS and/or its directors, officers and employees may have or have had interests or long or short positions in, and may at any time make purchases and/or sales as principal or agent, or UBS may act or have acted as market-maker in the relevant securities or related financial instruments discussed in this report. Furthermore, UBS may have or have had a relationship with or may provide or has provided corporate finance, capital markets and/or other financial services to the relevant companies. Employees of UBS may serve or have served as officers or directors of the relevant companies. UBS may rely on information barriers, such as "Chinese Walls," to control the flow of information contained in one or more areas within UBS, into other areas, units, divisions, groups, or affiliates of UBS.
Options, derivative products and futures are not suitable for all investors, and trading in these instruments is considered risky. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or income of any security or related instrument mentioned in this report. Clients wishing to effect transactions should contact their local sales representative. UBS accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of all or any part of this report. Additional information will be made available upon request.
EEA: This report has been issued by UBS Warburg Ltd., regulated in the UK by the Securities and Futures Authority. In the UK this report is for distribution to persons who are not UK private customers. Customers should approach the analyst(s) named on the cover regarding the contents of this report. For investment advice, trade execution or any other queries, customers should contact their London representative. Switzerland: This report is being distributed in Switzerland by UBS AG. Italy: Should persons receiving this research in Italy require additional information or wish to effect transactions in the relevant securities, they should contact either Giubergia UBS Warburg SIM SpA, an associate of UBS SA, in Milan or UBS Warburg (Italia) SIM SpA, a subsidiary of UBS SA, in Milan or its London or Lugano Branch. South Africa: UBS Warburg Securities (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd. (incorporating J.D. Anderson & Co.) is a member of the JSE Securities Exchange SA. United States: This report is being distributed to US persons by either UBS Warburg LLC or by UBS PaineWebber Inc., subsidiaries of UBS AG; or (ii) by a division, group, subsidiary or affiliate of UBS AG, that is not registered as a US broker-dealer (a "non-US affiliate"), to major US institutional investors only. UBS Warburg LLC or UBS PaineWebber Inc. accepts responsibility for the content of a report prepared by another non-US affiliate when distributed to US persons by UBS Warburg LLC or UBS PaineWebber Inc. All transactions by a US person in the securities mentioned in this report must be effected through UBS Warburg LLC or UBS PaineWebber Inc., and not through a non-US affiliate. Canada: This report is being distributed by UBS Bunting Warburg Inc., a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of the principal Canadian stock exchanges & CIPF. A statement of its financial condition and a list of its directors and senior officers will be provided upon request. Singapore: This report is being distributed in Singapore by UBS Warburg Pte. Ltd. Hong Kong: This report is being distributed in Hong Kong to investors who fall within section 3(1) of the Securities Ordinance (Cap 333) by UBS Warburg Asia Limited. Japan: This report is
being distributed in Japan by UBS Warburg (Japan) Limited to institutional investors only. Australia: This report is being distributed in Australia by UBS Warburg Australia Limited in relation to fixed income securities, and UBS Warburg Australia Equities Limited in relation to equity securities. New Zealand: This report is being distributed in New Zealand by UBS Warburg New Zealand Ltd in relation to fixed income securities and UBS Warburg New Zealand Equities Ltd in relation to equity securities.
+ 2001. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or distributed in any manner without the written permission of UBS. UBS specifically prohibits the re-distribution of this report, via the Internet or otherwise, and accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect.
Visit our website athttp://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
 
In general I'm not a male chauvinist but when it comes to the leadership of the BE, at a crucial time no less, I'm going to have to take that position. I want a person with cojones and I mean that in the literal sense. Get someone who is savvy and won't be wreckless when it's the wrong time of the month.

I think men and women have natural roles they are better at. Leadership is a masculine trait by nature. It takes aggression, testosterone, decisiveness, dedication, among other things men are more known for. On the other hand, women are much more emotionally in touch, nurturing, supportive, etc. Men are definitely more type A, take charge and that's what you look for in leaders. I'm not going to organize a rally if a female is Big East Commish, but I can totally understand where Sirvoo is coming from. It's hard to argue nature. Somewhere along the line liberals thought that women could replace men because we are basically all exactly the same. Women are not designed to replace men, they are designed to compliment men just as men are not designed to replace women, but to compliment them.

WTF
 
In general I'm not a male chauvinist but when it comes to the leadership of the BE, at a crucial time no less, I'm going to have to take that position. I want a person with cojones and I mean that in the literal sense. Get someone who is savvy and won't be wreckless when it's the wrong time of the month.

I think men and women have natural roles they are better at. Leadership is a masculine trait by nature. It takes aggression, testosterone, decisiveness, dedication, among other things men are more known for. On the other hand, women are much more emotionally in touch, nurturing, supportive, etc. Men are definitely more type A, take charge and that's what you look for in leaders. I'm not going to organize a rally if a female is Big East Commish, but I can totally understand where Sirvoo is coming from. It's hard to argue nature. Somewhere along the line liberals thought that women could replace men because we are basically all exactly the same. Women are not designed to replace men, they are designed to compliment men just as men are not designed to replace women, but to compliment them.

WTF

Kitchens and bedrooms... (LOL! I can't believe this discussion)
 
In general I'm not a male chauvinist but when it comes to the leadership of the BE, at a crucial time no less, I'm going to have to take that position. I want a person with cojones and I mean that in the literal sense. Get someone who is savvy and won't be wreckless when it's the wrong time of the month.

I think men and women have natural roles they are better at. Leadership is a masculine trait by nature. It takes aggression, testosterone, decisiveness, dedication, among other things men are more known for. On the other hand, women are much more emotionally in touch, nurturing, supportive, etc. Men are definitely more type A, take charge and that's what you look for in leaders. I'm not going to organize a rally if a female is Big East Commish, but I can totally understand where Sirvoo is coming from. It's hard to argue nature. Somewhere along the line liberals thought that women could replace men because we are basically all exactly the same. Women are not designed to replace men, they are designed to compliment men just as men are not designed to replace women, but to compliment them.

WTF

Kitchens and bedrooms... (LOL! I can't believe this discussion)

I'm with you guys, what the hell happened here?

Joe, I can't believe Im explaining this, but how can you possibly think men have a monopoly on leadership qualities? Look around you buddy, there are four star generals in the army who are women, CEOs at blue chips like IBM and Lockheed Martin, and more women in political office and on the Supreme Court that's it's not even worth listing them all.

Of all your opinions, this is the most perverse.
 
In general I'm not a male chauvinist but when it comes to the leadership of the BE, at a crucial time no less, I'm going to have to take that position. I want a person with cojones and I mean that in the literal sense. Get someone who is savvy and won't be wreckless when it's the wrong time of the month.

I think men and women have natural roles they are better at. Leadership is a masculine trait by nature. It takes aggression, testosterone, decisiveness, dedication, among other things men are more known for. On the other hand, women are much more emotionally in touch, nurturing, supportive, etc. Men are definitely more type A, take charge and that's what you look for in leaders. I'm not going to organize a rally if a female is Big East Commish, but I can totally understand where Sirvoo is coming from. It's hard to argue nature. Somewhere along the line liberals thought that women could replace men because we are basically all exactly the same. Women are not designed to replace men, they are designed to compliment men just as men are not designed to replace women, but to compliment them.

WTF

Kitchens and bedrooms... (LOL! I can't believe this discussion)

I'm with you guys, what the hell happened here?

Joe, I can't believe Im explaining this, but how can you possibly think men have a monopoly on leadership qualities? Look around you buddy, there are four star generals in the army who are women, CEOs at blue chips like IBM and Lockheed Martin, and more women in political office and on the Supreme Court that's it's not even worth listing them all.

Of all your opinions, this is the most perverse.

Not all of us are too far gone into feminist drivel. First weed out the affirmative action hires and secondly, why waste time on mere exceptions while ignoring the rule? The fact is that men and women have different but complimentary roles they excel in. Ever hear of the women's happiness studies? As the country becomes more feminist they get even more pissed off and depressed with their lives. If they are so empowered now shouldn't they be thrilled? Many women will tell you themselves "I just want to marry a rich guy and be a housewife!". Deep down many women would give anything to turn back the clock to spend more time with their kids and family rather than being a breadwinner. Women have turned into men and that's why dating is so rare in my generation. It's essentially dead. They want to be treated like princesses, but then they want to be treated like the boss too.

Chivalry and feminism are polar opposites. Chivalry was based on the concept that women were generally weaker, more vulnerable physically/emotionally, etc. Women these days are miserable. All it takes is a quick google search to see the true scope of this and the reason is because feminism is based on the lie that we are exactly the same. We are 2 pieces to the same puzzle, not 2 of the same puzzle pieces. Whether you want to admit it or not, history will tell you that 9 times out of 10 if you want a leader who takes risks (proven to be way more common in men) you pick a man. There are obviously some great women leaders but they are far and few in between. This is well-known, nothing radical. Testosterone and risk taking is something very important for leaders and women are lacking in those areas on average.
 
In general I'm not a male chauvinist but when it comes to the leadership of the BE, at a crucial time no less, I'm going to have to take that position. I want a person with cojones and I mean that in the literal sense. Get someone who is savvy and won't be wreckless when it's the wrong time of the month.

Tell you the truth, no man can be as ruthless as a strong woman leader. Women aren't lead around by their cojones, and that is often a good thing. Ackerman seems like a terrific choice, and women are much more level headed and less reckless than men overall IMO.


LOL, listen dude, I happen to think she is an OK choice and definately dont agree with sirvoo, but spare us this silly pseudo-feminist tripe about women supposed advantages.
Women are in fact not as ruthless in general. But i dont think that is necessarily what is needed for that position
 
In general I'm not a male chauvinist but when it comes to the leadership of the BE, at a crucial time no less, I'm going to have to take that position. I want a person with cojones and I mean that in the literal sense. Get someone who is savvy and won't be wreckless when it's the wrong time of the month.

I think men and women have natural roles they are better at. Leadership is a masculine trait by nature. It takes aggression, testosterone, decisiveness, dedication, among other things men are more known for. On the other hand, women are much more emotionally in touch, nurturing, supportive, etc. Men are definitely more type A, take charge and that's what you look for in leaders. I'm not going to organize a rally if a female is Big East Commish, but I can totally understand where Sirvoo is coming from. It's hard to argue nature. Somewhere along the line liberals thought that women could replace men because we are basically all exactly the same. Women are not designed to replace men, they are designed to compliment men just as men are not designed to replace women, but to compliment them.

WTF

Kitchens and bedrooms... (LOL! I can't believe this discussion)

I'm with you guys, what the hell happened here?

Joe, I can't believe Im explaining this, but how can you possibly think men have a monopoly on leadership qualities? Look around you buddy, there are four star generals in the army who are women, CEOs at blue chips like IBM and Lockheed Martin, and more women in political office and on the Supreme Court that's it's not even worth listing them all.

Of all your opinions, this is the most perverse.

Not all of us are too far gone into feminist drivel. First weed out the affirmative action hires and secondly, why waste time on mere exceptions while ignoring the rule? The fact is that men and women have different but complimentary roles they excel in. Ever hear of the women's happiness studies? As the country becomes more feminist they get even more pissed off and depressed with their lives. If they are so empowered now shouldn't they be thrilled? Many women will tell you themselves "I just want to marry a rich guy and be a housewife!". Deep down many women would give anything to turn back the clock to spend more time with their kids and family rather than being a breadwinner. Women have turned into men and that's why dating is so rare in my generation. It's essentially dead. They want to be treated like princesses, but then they want to be treated like the boss too.

Chivalry and feminism are polar opposites. Chivalry was based on the concept that women were generally weaker, more vulnerable physically/emotionally, etc. Women these days are miserable. All it takes is a quick google search to see the true scope of this and the reason is because feminism is based on the lie that we are exactly the same. We are 2 pieces to the same puzzle, not 2 of the same puzzle pieces. Whether you want to admit it or not, history will tell you that 9 times out of 10 if you want a leader who takes risks (proven to be way more common in men) you pick a man. There are obviously some great women leaders but they are far and few in between. This is well-known, nothing radical. Testosterone and risk taking is something very important for leaders and women are lacking in those areas on average.

I think she is more than qualified and hope she gets the job.
 
Not all of us are too far gone into feminist drivel. First weed out the affirmative action hires and secondly, why waste time on mere exceptions while ignoring the rule? The fact is that men and women have different but complimentary roles they excel in. Ever hear of the women's happiness studies? As the country becomes more feminist they get even more pissed off and depressed with their lives. If they are so empowered now shouldn't they be thrilled? Many women will tell you themselves "I just want to marry a rich guy and be a housewife!". Deep down many women would give anything to turn back the clock to spend more time with their kids and family rather than being a breadwinner. Women have turned into men and that's why dating is so rare in my generation. It's essentially dead. They want to be treated like princesses, but then they want to be treated like the boss too.

Chivalry and feminism are polar opposites. Chivalry was based on the concept that women were generally weaker, more vulnerable physically/emotionally, etc. Women these days are miserable. All it takes is a quick google search to see the true scope of this and the reason is because feminism is based on the lie that we are exactly the same. We are 2 pieces to the same puzzle, not 2 of the same puzzle pieces. Whether you want to admit it or not, history will tell you that 9 times out of 10 if you want a leader who takes risks (proven to be way more common in men) you pick a man. There are obviously some great women leaders but they are far and few in between. This is well-known, nothing radical. Testosterone and risk taking is something very important for leaders and women are lacking in those areas on average.

...And this is a good time to reiterate that the comments made on this forum reflect the views of their original poster and any and all disclaimers standard or otherwise apply. Comments may be used to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. The creation of straw men to argue against things neither said nor implied as well as the repetition of previously discredited memes is common as is the steering of the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions.

Further on for what so shall be known henceforth and in perpetuity as the joe3 clause, all comments of Joe3, aka ressurection of joe, aka redmencomsucks, aka pleasedontbanmeagain, aka joemama, aka jose3, aka Iwillneverposthereagain, aka vivamexico!, aka gloriasteinMAN, aka IamNOTjoe3, aka joes'snicebrother, aka joe3ImSoberNow, aka thistimeIreallywon'teverposthereagain, aka josejosejimenez, aka bongwaterscienceexperiment, aka i'vechangedmymindagainandnowiwillsettherecordfornumberofpostsandforlongestusername(s),
and all other aliases whether they be created under the influence of alcohol, illegal drugs, or mild altering prescription medication, or actual alternate personality from a medically recognized condition, shall be the sole opinion of joe3 whether he be a real human being, fictional character, illegal alien, area 51 alien, great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jelly, south american tinhorn dictator, or mad scientist. If joe3 or any of the iterations of the joe3 entity be a exposed in her real identity as the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo, the joe3 clause will retain all of its potency and will not require being renamed to the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo Clause.
 
...And this is a good time to reiterate that the comments made on this forum reflect the views of their original poster and any and all disclaimers standard or otherwise apply. Comments may be used to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. The creation of straw men to argue against things neither said nor implied as well as the repetition of previously discredited memes is common as is the steering of the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions.

Further on for what so shall be known henceforth and in perpetuity as the joe3 clause, all comments of Joe3, aka ressurection of joe, aka redmencomsucks, aka pleasedontbanmeagain, aka joemama, aka jose3, aka Iwillneverposthereagain, aka vivamexico!, aka gloriasteinMAN, aka IamNOTjoe3, aka joes'snicebrother, aka joe3ImSoberNow, aka thistimeIreallywon'teverposthereagain, aka josejosejimenez, aka bongwaterscienceexperiment, aka i'vechangedmymindagainandnowiwillsettherecordfornumberofpostsandforlongestusername(s),
and all other aliases whether they be created under the influence of alcohol, illegal drugs, or mild altering prescription medication, or actual alternate personality from a medically recognized condition, shall be the sole opinion of joe3 whether he be a real human being, fictional character, illegal alien, area 51 alien, great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jelly, south american tinhorn dictator, or mad scientist. If joe3 or any of the iterations of the joe3 entity be a exposed in her real identity as the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo, the joe3 clause will retain all of its potency and will not require being renamed to the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo Clause.

My vote for Post of the Year! Is Paul eligible to win an award?
 
Not all of us are too far gone into feminist drivel. First weed out the affirmative action hires and secondly, why waste time on mere exceptions while ignoring the rule? The fact is that men and women have different but complimentary roles they excel in. Ever hear of the women's happiness studies? As the country becomes more feminist they get even more pissed off and depressed with their lives. If they are so empowered now shouldn't they be thrilled? Many women will tell you themselves "I just want to marry a rich guy and be a housewife!". Deep down many women would give anything to turn back the clock to spend more time with their kids and family rather than being a breadwinner. Women have turned into men and that's why dating is so rare in my generation. It's essentially dead. They want to be treated like princesses, but then they want to be treated like the boss too.

Chivalry and feminism are polar opposites. Chivalry was based on the concept that women were generally weaker, more vulnerable physically/emotionally, etc. Women these days are miserable. All it takes is a quick google search to see the true scope of this and the reason is because feminism is based on the lie that we are exactly the same. We are 2 pieces to the same puzzle, not 2 of the same puzzle pieces. Whether you want to admit it or not, history will tell you that 9 times out of 10 if you want a leader who takes risks (proven to be way more common in men) you pick a man. There are obviously some great women leaders but they are far and few in between. This is well-known, nothing radical. Testosterone and risk taking is something very important for leaders and women are lacking in those areas on average.

...And this is a good time to reiterate that the comments made on this forum reflect the views of their original poster and any and all disclaimers standard or otherwise apply. Comments may be used to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. The creation of straw men to argue against things neither said nor implied as well as the repetition of previously discredited memes is common as is the steering of the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions.

Further on for what so shall be known henceforth and in perpetuity as the joe3 clause, all comments of Joe3, aka ressurection of joe, aka redmencomsucks, aka pleasedontbanmeagain, aka joemama, aka jose3, aka Iwillneverposthereagain, aka vivamexico!, aka gloriasteinMAN, aka IamNOTjoe3, aka joes'snicebrother, aka joe3ImSoberNow, aka thistimeIreallywon'teverposthereagain, aka josejosejimenez, aka bongwaterscienceexperiment, aka i'vechangedmymindagainandnowiwillsettherecordfornumberofpostsandforlongestusername(s),
and all other aliases whether they be created under the influence of alcohol, illegal drugs, or mild altering prescription medication, or actual alternate personality from a medically recognized condition, shall be the sole opinion of joe3 whether he be a real human being, fictional character, illegal alien, area 51 alien, great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jelly, south american tinhorn dictator, or mad scientist. If joe3 or any of the iterations of the joe3 entity be a exposed in her real identity as the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo, the joe3 clause will retain all of its potency and will not require being renamed to the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo Clause.

How did you know I was also Josejosejimenez?! Touche sir, touche. :woohoo:
 
...And this is a good time to reiterate that the comments made on this forum reflect the views of their original poster and any and all disclaimers standard or otherwise apply. Comments may be used to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. The creation of straw men to argue against things neither said nor implied as well as the repetition of previously discredited memes is common as is the steering of the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions.

Further on for what so shall be known henceforth and in perpetuity as the joe3 clause, all comments of Joe3, aka ressurection of joe, aka redmencomsucks, aka pleasedontbanmeagain, aka joemama, aka jose3, aka Iwillneverposthereagain, aka vivamexico!, aka gloriasteinMAN, aka IamNOTjoe3, aka joes'snicebrother, aka joe3ImSoberNow, aka thistimeIreallywon'teverposthereagain, aka josejosejimenez, aka bongwaterscienceexperiment, aka i'vechangedmymindagainandnowiwillsettherecordfornumberofpostsandforlongestusername(s),
and all other aliases whether they be created under the influence of alcohol, illegal drugs, or mild altering prescription medication, or actual alternate personality from a medically recognized condition, shall be the sole opinion of joe3 whether he be a real human being, fictional character, illegal alien, area 51 alien, great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jelly, south american tinhorn dictator, or mad scientist. If joe3 or any of the iterations of the joe3 entity be a exposed in her real identity as the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo, the joe3 clause will retain all of its potency and will not require being renamed to the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo Clause.

My vote for Post of the Year! Is Paul eligible to win an award?

I named a softball league a long time ago that I started for my friends and I after myself and a member here has a football stadium named after his father so I dont see why Paul wouldnt be eligble for post of the year. Heck we can name the award after him also.
 
House that Frida Kahlo shared with Diego Rivera in Guanajuato is now a very nice museum. I know I was trained in part by crazed Maryknoll sisters just out of the Guatemalan jungles working in rebel controlled villages, but isn't Paul quite the closet revolutionary.
 
...And this is a good time to reiterate that the comments made on this forum reflect the views of their original poster and any and all disclaimers standard or otherwise apply. Comments may be used to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. The creation of straw men to argue against things neither said nor implied as well as the repetition of previously discredited memes is common as is the steering of the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions.

Further on for what so shall be known henceforth and in perpetuity as the joe3 clause, all comments of Joe3, aka ressurection of joe, aka redmencomsucks, aka pleasedontbanmeagain, aka joemama, aka jose3, aka Iwillneverposthereagain, aka vivamexico!, aka gloriasteinMAN, aka IamNOTjoe3, aka joes'snicebrother, aka joe3ImSoberNow, aka thistimeIreallywon'teverposthereagain, aka josejosejimenez, aka bongwaterscienceexperiment, aka i'vechangedmymindagainandnowiwillsettherecordfornumberofpostsandforlongestusername(s),
and all other aliases whether they be created under the influence of alcohol, illegal drugs, or mild altering prescription medication, or actual alternate personality from a medically recognized condition, shall be the sole opinion of joe3 whether he be a real human being, fictional character, illegal alien, area 51 alien, great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jelly, south american tinhorn dictator, or mad scientist. If joe3 or any of the iterations of the joe3 entity be a exposed in her real identity as the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo, the joe3 clause will retain all of its potency and will not require being renamed to the Resurrection of Frida Kahlo Clause.

My vote for Post of the Year! Is Paul eligible to win an award?

I named a softball league a long time ago that I started for my friends and I after myself and a member here has a football stadium named after his father so I dont see why Paul wouldnt be eligble for post of the year. Heck we can name the award after him also.

Just a bit of trivia (?): The greatest pitcher to never win the Cy Young award?

Answer: Cy Young
 
Joe, this is usually where it starts. You go off on some tangent and talk about political correctness or liberals, it leads you to become combative in your posts and eventually leads to, well, your latest name reincarnation on this board says it all.

For those of you who don't think woman can't be ruthless, you might want to talk to some divorced men who might tell you differently. I definately can think of two right of the back.

Get the best available person for the job, period and if she is it, good for her and the Conference.
 
Back
Top