Fun Fun Fun
Active member
OP makes a reasonable point. However:
Under the old system endemically corrupt programs - Kentucky, Louisville, dook, North Carolina, UCLA, Syracuse etc i.e programs where "student athletes" were paid historically (an awkward construction made necessary by the arbitrary rule against split infinitive) by wealthy donors - achieved positions of privilege from which they are unlike to be dislodged them, with outliers like SJU (see also Jack Molinas) and Syracuse obviously. Is there an ebb and flow? Sure. For every SJU that reaches a point of inertia there's a scum bag like Bruce Pearl or Scott Drew waiting in the wind to take its place
“For Baylor? Why Scott, it profit a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world. . . but for Baylor!”
What the new system does is create a playing field where any podunk program can cheat with the same fervor as the blue bloods. Allowing everyone equal access to unscrupulousness democratizes "amateur" athletics in the same way that the internets created a free market for dissent. It used to be that D2 West Chester University swimming program needed to be worried about being sanctioned via monetary and recruiting penalties whereas Baylor - where people were MURDERED – got to impose penalties on itself.
We've been treated in response to the new system Rick Pitino - late of the two most corrupt programs in college basketball history - bemoaning the influence of money in college athletics. Consider that. That makes me think someone is doing something right
tl;dr The new system contributes to the downfall of western civilization, therefore of it I approve.
Under the old system endemically corrupt programs - Kentucky, Louisville, dook, North Carolina, UCLA, Syracuse etc i.e programs where "student athletes" were paid historically (an awkward construction made necessary by the arbitrary rule against split infinitive) by wealthy donors - achieved positions of privilege from which they are unlike to be dislodged them, with outliers like SJU (see also Jack Molinas) and Syracuse obviously. Is there an ebb and flow? Sure. For every SJU that reaches a point of inertia there's a scum bag like Bruce Pearl or Scott Drew waiting in the wind to take its place
“For Baylor? Why Scott, it profit a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world. . . but for Baylor!”
What the new system does is create a playing field where any podunk program can cheat with the same fervor as the blue bloods. Allowing everyone equal access to unscrupulousness democratizes "amateur" athletics in the same way that the internets created a free market for dissent. It used to be that D2 West Chester University swimming program needed to be worried about being sanctioned via monetary and recruiting penalties whereas Baylor - where people were MURDERED – got to impose penalties on itself.
We've been treated in response to the new system Rick Pitino - late of the two most corrupt programs in college basketball history - bemoaning the influence of money in college athletics. Consider that. That makes me think someone is doing something right
tl;dr The new system contributes to the downfall of western civilization, therefore of it I approve.