There are too many people on this board with unrealistic expectations for this program as a whole. They want to be Duke or Kentucky and bring in 5 star recruits every year despite being mostly inconsequential in the college basketball landscape for 20+ years. It is literally impossible to become Duke or Kentucky starting from where this program is now. You need a foundation, you need stability, you need to stack years of success upon each other. We'll never get there with the revolving door approach to coaches that we've been using for the past 20 years.
It is completely reasonable, given the team Coach Anderson has put together this season, to expect an NCAA Tournament berth. It was completely reasonable last year under the same circumstances. For whatever reason, bizarre things have happened to this program when we seem to be on the cusp of doing something good, so it's definitely possible that those things happen again this year and end up derailing things to some extent. If that happens, and we miss out on the post-season again through no real fault of the coaches, then I would probably vote to keep Coach Anderson, but alas, I have no vote.
If we do part ways with him however, we better have a really good plan to replace him instead of reliving the PR nightmare we had trying to replace the last coach. Miss me with the Pitino talk. I know he's a Hall of Fame coach and recruiter, that much is undeniable, but I can't imagine under any circumstances that the administration would ever be on board with bringing him in. Also, I can't imagine him actually wanting to coach here. I realize that when nobody would touch him, he threw it out there during the last replacement period that he wanted the job, but I strongly believe that was only to launder his reputation and that he would be gone to a "better" program after the first major offer he had and then we would pretty much be back in the same boat.
We need a coach that is going to be here long enough to build a program that can withstand that coach leaving and still be successful under the next guy.
Forget about being Duke or Kentucky. Why can't we be Providence? Why can't we be Xavier? Butler went to two straight championship games with mostly under-recruited guys from the midwest who fit their system and was successful through several coaching changes. I know people want national championships, but you have to at least be "good" before you can be "great". Also, the people on this board would have spontaneously combusted if our roster had been loaded with 4 and 5 star players like Kentucky yet have the same amount of NCAA wins as us in the past two seasons, and lost as a 2 seed to a team we beat last year.
Look at Gonzaga. They were essentially a nowhere school in Spokane, and then they built a program with solid players from the west coast who slipped through the cracks and guys from Australia and 20 years later they're bringing in 5 star players every year and competing for national championships. This is how you build a program, but it starts with making the right hire and bringing in the right guys to fill out your roster, regardless of where the recruiting guys have them ranked.
Is Coach A the "right hire"? How this season turns out will go a long way towards answering that question.