Seth Davis: "Will SJU Be Relevant Again" Response

paultzman

Well-known member
2023 $upporter 2022 $upporter
WIll St. John's ever be relevant again? — Mike Achilarre (@Achilarre)

Both of these sad fans use the word “ever.” Well, “ever” is a long time, but I think it’s fair to say that there is nothing to indicate this once-proud program is on the verge of a resurgence under second-year coach Chris Mullin. The Red Storm, which claimed just one Big East win last season, are now 5–6 with losses to Delaware State (at home, no less) and by one point at LIU Brooklyn last Sunday. The Johnnies host Penn State on Sunday and then on Wednesday play at Syracuse, which lost to the Red Storm in Madison Square Garden this time last year. Then Big East play begins, and we all know how strong that league is this season.

It may feel like St. John’s hasn’t been relevant since Mullin played there back in the early 1980s, but the Johnnies did make the NCAA tournament twice in the last five years. There was also that run to the Elite Eight in 1999 under Mike Jarvis. But that, of course, is a far cry from Mullin’s heyday. Obviously the program can and should be in much better shape than it is now, but the fact is, times have changed drastically since the school’s last Final Four appearance in 1985. Those days, I’m afraid, are long gone. Mullin may have walked through that door, but the younger version of himself is playing somewhere else.

What happened? Progress, change, time, evolution—all those things. When Lou Carnesecca roamed the sidelines, the college basketball world was much smaller. There were not that many programs that had access to great arenas like Madison Square Garden and regular national television exposure. Carnesecca had one of the greatest pipelines in the history of the sport from the Riverside Church basketball program, which was run by his good friend Ernie Lorch, straight to Queens. Best of all, because St. John’s did not have any on-campus dorms, Carnesecca was able to provide his players with a stipend to cover their cost of living expenses. Since St. John’s is located in a high-end neighborhood, that was a handsome sum. Players could live at home, commute to school, and pocket the cash. It was all legal.

As the sport expanded, more and more programs could offer players exposure and opportunities to compete. The Riverside Church program petered out, a demise that was accelerated when Lorch was forced to resign in 2002 following allegations of sexual abuse made by one of his former players. St. John’s, which still plays its on-campus games in Carnesecca Arena and many of its bigger games in Madison Square Garden, has been lapped several times over when it comes to facilities. The school built on-campus dorms, which brought the stipend racket to a halt. And most damaging of all, the national prep scene exploded, robbing New York City of its best young players. People can talk all they want about the need for St. John’s to recruit the best players from New York, but that is hard to do when the best players from New York are actually playing high school ball in Las Vegas, North Carolina, Florida, Virginia and California. Those youngsters have come of age during an era when St. John’s has not been all that relevant. So it’s a vicious cycle.

Mullin is only in his second year, so it is not fair to blame him for the team’s struggles. He has one of the youngest rosters in the entire country; St. John’s is ranked 348th in experience on kenpom.com. Mullin did well to recruit a very good young player from Brooklyn in Shamorie Ponds, a 6' 1" combo guard who was voted the Big East’s preseason freshman of the year. Another Brooklyn native, 6' 7" junior forward Bashir Ahmed, transferred in from junior college. The leading scorer is Marcus LoVett, a redshirt freshman from Fort Wayne, Indiana. (He has also missed the last three games due to an ankle injury.) There is some international flavor featuring players from Italy, Mali and Germany. There was also a native of Spain, Yankuba Sima, but he just announced he is transferring.

I saw this team in person for three straight days at the Battle 4 Atlantis. These guys have some talent. The problem is they have no idea how to play winning basketball right now. St. John’s played three good teams that week—Michigan State, VCU and Old Dominion. In each case, they hung tough for a half, maybe 30 minutes. But when winning time arrived, the Johnnies were mentally worn out and overmatched. I expect that pattern will repeat itself during Big East season.

If there is one over-arching thought I have regarding this program’s situation, it is the need for Mullin to do a much better job exploiting the transfer market. This is far more important than recruiting high school players, because if you can have a steady diet of transfers in your program, it means you will never be really young. There are plenty of good mid-major players looking to move up each spring. I think it is in Mullin’s best interest to identify good players, bring them into his program, teach them and toughen them up while they sit for a year, and then let them build a winning culture.

The thing is, that takes a while. From my conversations with Mullin, I believe he is dedicated towards turning this thing around, but there are plenty of people out there who are wondering if he really is going to stick it out. And you can bet that’s what his recruits are hearing from rival coaches. The only thing we know for sure is that this program became elite by operating a certain way, but that was a long time ago. For St. John’s to become elite again, it has to adapt to the current environment, not try to live off the good ole days.
 
Scathing , but not untrue . As these other programs progressed we kept our mom and pop operation and hired bad coaches , had a year without a AD . Just amazing what goes on here .
 
Scathing , but not untrue . As these other programs progressed we kept our mom and pop operation and hired bad coaches , had a year without a AD . Just amazing what goes on here .

Sorry I did not include second half of Davis' response prior to your response.
 
Stating the obvious, these type public observations certainly can't help recruiting, especially the speculation noted that Mullin may not stick around. Perhaps we win a few games impressively & get off the negative radar screen a bit.
 
WIll St. John's ever be relevant again? — Mike Achilarre (@Achilarre)

Both of these sad fans use the word “ever.” Well, “ever” is a long time, but I think it’s fair to say that there is nothing to indicate this once-proud program is on the verge of a resurgence under second-year coach Chris Mullin. The Red Storm, which claimed just one Big East win last season, are now 5–6 with losses to Delaware State (at home, no less) and by one point at LIU Brooklyn last Sunday. The Johnnies host Penn State on Sunday and then on Wednesday play at Syracuse, which lost to the Red Storm in Madison Square Garden this time last year. Then Big East play begins, and we all know how strong that league is this season.

It may feel like St. John’s hasn’t been relevant since Mullin played there back in the early 1980s, but the Johnnies did make the NCAA tournament twice in the last five years. There was also that run to the Elite Eight in 1999 under Mike Jarvis. But that, of course, is a far cry from Mullin’s heyday. Obviously the program can and should be in much better shape than it is now, but the fact is, times have changed drastically since the school’s last Final Four appearance in 1985. Those days, I’m afraid, are long gone. Mullin may have walked through that door, but the younger version of himself is playing somewhere else.

What happened? Progress, change, time, evolution—all those things. When Lou Carnesecca roamed the sidelines, the college basketball world was much smaller. There were not that many programs that had access to great arenas like Madison Square Garden and regular national television exposure. Carnesecca had one of the greatest pipelines in the history of the sport from the Riverside Church basketball program, which was run by his good friend Ernie Lorch, straight to Queens. Best of all, because St. John’s did not have any on-campus dorms, Carnesecca was able to provide his players with a stipend to cover their cost of living expenses. Since St. John’s is located in a high-end neighborhood, that was a handsome sum. Players could live at home, commute to school, and pocket the cash. It was all legal.

As the sport expanded, more and more programs could offer players exposure and opportunities to compete. The Riverside Church program petered out, a demise that was accelerated when Lorch was forced to resign in 2002 following allegations of sexual abuse made by one of his former players. St. John’s, which still plays its on-campus games in Carnesecca Arena and many of its bigger games in Madison Square Garden, has been lapped several times over when it comes to facilities. The school built on-campus dorms, which brought the stipend racket to a halt. And most damaging of all, the national prep scene exploded, robbing New York City of its best young players. People can talk all they want about the need for St. John’s to recruit the best players from New York, but that is hard to do when the best players from New York are actually playing high school ball in Las Vegas, North Carolina, Florida, Virginia and California. Those youngsters have come of age during an era when St. John’s has not been all that relevant. So it’s a vicious cycle.

Mullin is only in his second year, so it is not fair to blame him for the team’s struggles. He has one of the youngest rosters in the entire country; St. John’s is ranked 348th in experience on kenpom.com. Mullin did well to recruit a very good young player from Brooklyn in Shamorie Ponds, a 6' 1" combo guard who was voted the Big East’s preseason freshman of the year. Another Brooklyn native, 6' 7" junior forward Bashir Ahmed, transferred in from junior college. The leading scorer is Marcus LoVett, a redshirt freshman from Fort Wayne, Indiana. (He has also missed the last three games due to an ankle injury.) There is some international flavor featuring players from Italy, Mali and Germany. There was also a native of Spain, Yankuba Sima, but he just announced he is transferring.

I saw this team in person for three straight days at the Battle 4 Atlantis. These guys have some talent. The problem is they have no idea how to play winning basketball right now. St. John’s played three good teams that week—Michigan State, VCU and Old Dominion. In each case, they hung tough for a half, maybe 30 minutes. But when winning time arrived, the Johnnies were mentally worn out and overmatched. I expect that pattern will repeat itself during Big East season.

If there is one over-arching thought I have regarding this program’s situation, it is the need for Mullin to do a much better job exploiting the transfer market. This is far more important than recruiting high school players, because if you can have a steady diet of transfers in your program, it means you will never be really young. There are plenty of good mid-major players looking to move up each spring. I think it is in Mullin’s best interest to identify good players, bring them into his program, teach them and toughen them up while they sit for a year, and then let them build a winning culture.

The thing is, that takes a while. From my conversations with Mullin, I believe he is dedicated towards turning this thing around, but there are plenty of people out there who are wondering if he really is going to stick it out. And you can bet that’s what his recruits are hearing from rival coaches. The only thing we know for sure is that this program became elite by operating a certain way, but that was a long time ago. For St. John’s to become elite again, it has to adapt to the current environment, not try to live off the good ole days.

While it's true that college basketball is now a national sport with international recruiting the NY area players should and could be recruited back to the City they all love. The recruiting mindset at St. John's was slow to change with the changes. Unfortunately, while Steve Lavin refocused our recruiting nationally with Harrison, Sampson, Pointer etc., he neglected the tri state.
The on campus arenas were always bigger than most northeastern schools like Villanova, St. John's, Georgetown and Seton Hall. It was the lack of consistent success and a succession of successors fired by administration that sucked at their jobs that has relegated St. John's to the basement instead of the penthouse like at Villanova or even a pied-a-terrre like Butler or Xavier that are located in large urban areas.
We are apparently on another magical mystery tour with one of the biggest gambles in college basketball coaching history. Leave it to St. John's to focus on stability. We are hopefully refocused on recruiting which is the lifeblood of any program whether it be Ames, Iowa or bustling Storrs, Connecticut. Get the players ready to play first and focus on developing those that need development later in the process. Slice and Matt were hired to do just that but somehow things went into the slow lane quickly.
The dorm and gloom scenario is bogus. Find a way to get students involved in the program. Have Greeks vs. Geeks night, halftime rap contests, coed strippers, anything but what is passing now as a college atmosphere.
But mostly they need to play competitive basketball with fewer Delaware State performances.
Mullin can help by becoming more polished on the sidelines and instead of saying he wanted to get the program back to respectability and then "pass it off" he should be emphazing how he wants to be at St. John's until well past social security like Boeheim, coach K and other lifers.
We at St. John's have always created is our own self fulfilling prophecies .
 
Stating the obvious, these type public observations certainly can't help recruiting, especially the speculation noted that Mullin may not stick around. Perhaps we win a few games impressively & get off the negative radar screen a bit.

His house is for sale, whatever that may mean.
 
Stating the obvious, these type public observations certainly can't help recruiting, especially the speculation noted that Mullin may not stick around. Perhaps we win a few games impressively & get off the negative radar screen a bit.

Agree. Thought we'd have a comfortable "middling" type season this year, in range of .500 overall and with enough BE wins that there wouldn't be questions around direction of program. Swept in Bahamas + losses to Del. St./LIU has obviously changed that.

Doesn't necessarily change big picture if we don't, but as you suggest we would definitely benefit from competitive conference showing with 5-6 wins and perhaps not last place.

If we can do that, with Lovett/Ponds/Ahmed back next year, + the two transfers/ZB and whoever else will be on the way, don't think these conversations will be ongoing next year. Hoping that's not too many "ifs", and Lovett/Ponds obviously the key to this year and next.
 
Stating the obvious, these type public observations certainly can't help recruiting, especially the speculation noted that Mullin may not stick around. Perhaps we win a few games impressively & get off the negative radar screen a bit.

His house is for sale, whatever that may mean.

It means a precocious teenager may have tipped the iceberg. Hopefully, not in the direction of the Titanic.
 
I really hate the dorming excuse. Dorming at SJU is a good experience, it maybe a little strict but it's fine nonetheless.
 
I'm not sure, but this reads as if his opinion was culled from Redmen.com commentaries.

If Lavin made us relevant (=competitive) again very quickly, Mullin could do the same. When Lavin took the reigns this was a really appropriate question being murmured in basketball circles. At that time, the question was, should SJU drop out of the Big East and become a mid major, presumably because we could never be competitive (relevant) again on a national stage.

Once Lavin proved we could, the question was answered for the time being. Mullin is starting with nothing, a thin roster and no experience. As long as the guys we want to stick around do stay, and he continues to build a roster, we will be relevant (=competitive) on a national stage once again.

End of story.
 
Stating the obvious, these type public observations certainly can't help recruiting, especially the speculation noted that Mullin may not stick around. Perhaps we win a few games impressively & get off the negative radar screen a bit.
That's why I think winning is important. Jones leaving and not getting Livingston hurt. Loose and its fuel for fire from rival coaches.
 
I'm not sure, but this reads as if his opinion was culled from Redmen.com commentaries.

If Lavin made us relevant (=competitive) again very quickly, Mullin could do the same. When Lavin took the reigns this was a really appropriate question being murmured in basketball circles. At that time, the question was, should SJU drop out of the Big East and become a mid major, presumably because we could never be competitive (relevant) again on a national stage.

Once Lavin proved we could, the question was answered for the time being. Mullin is starting with nothing, a thin roster and no experience. As long as the guys we want to stick around do stay, and he continues to build a roster, we will be relevant (=competitive) on a national stage once again.

End of story.
Beast, the problem is that not everyone accepts the theory that Lavin made us relevant again. Yes he made two NCAAs but given that they came on the 1st & last end of a five year stretch, it debatable whether even his tenure brought us back to relevancy. I think the larger picture is what really worries me, since 2003, only 2 NCAAs. It's tough to swallow but we may no longer be in danger of becoming irrelevant, we may already be there. Lets hope that Mullin does have some magic.
 
If Mullin leaves after this season or the next one and we still stink, did he really "tarnish his legacy"?
For those of us that saw him play it doesn't. One thing has nothing to do with the other so I think that whole legacy thing is nonsense.
For the younger fan there was never really a legacy to tarnish. Unfortunately their memories of Mullin will be as a wildly unsuccessful coach instead of the smart, great player that he was. That is too bad but no matter how it works out I am glad he took the shot.
 
I'm not sure, but this reads as if his opinion was culled from Redmen.com commentaries.

If Lavin made us relevant (=competitive) again very quickly, Mullin could do the same. When Lavin took the reigns this was a really appropriate question being murmured in basketball circles. At that time, the question was, should SJU drop out of the Big East and become a mid major, presumably because we could never be competitive (relevant) again on a national stage.

Once Lavin proved we could, the question was answered for the time being. Mullin is starting with nothing, a thin roster and no experience. As long as the guys we want to stick around do stay, and he continues to build a roster, we will be relevant (=competitive) on a national stage once again.

End of story.
Beast, the problem is that not everyone accepts the theory that Lavin made us relevant again. Yes he made two NCAAs but given that they came on the 1st & last end of a five year stretch, it debatable whether even his tenure brought us back to relevancy. I think the larger picture is what really worries me, since 2003, only 2 NCAAs. It's tough to swallow but we may no longer be in danger of becoming irrelevant, we may already be there. Lets hope that Mullin does have some magic.

I'm not in any way a Lavin fan, but he did make us relevant again. Getting to the tourney, players showing up in the NBA draft, and winning some Big East rivalry showdowns counts for the general NCAA basketball fan...it doesn't fly for the keen follower of day to day or even game to game SJU basketball, but our name was back out there with a coach of celebrity status. I know many of us came to loathe that fact, but his time at UCLA and then in front of the camera for several years earned him that status. Next season we need to be a bubble team being talked about at the beginning of March. The "ifs" are there for next season, Brown being a pretty big one, but more important would be the transfers we don't know about and the return of our best players from the current season. This season still has legs, and the development of Ponds, Lovett, Ahmed, Yakwe and RF are keys to our future success.
 
:dry:
I really hate the dorming excuse. Dorming at SJU is a good experience, it maybe a little strict but it's fine nonetheless.

Other than flyers taped to walls and mentioning on WSJU or whatever what can motivate students to attend games. Lower ticket prices or free tickets? What would make student groups attend games? Are there any rallies of support?
Are the coaches visible with the students? Are there efforts to get students to Madison Square Garden? Should there be a free student section courtside like at Cameron with incentives to be there? Who coordinates student support?
We want to hear from more students.
 
:dry:
I really hate the dorming excuse. Dorming at SJU is a good experience, it maybe a little strict but it's fine nonetheless.

Other than flyers taped to walls and mentioning on WSJU or whatever what can motivate students to attend games. Lower ticket prices or free tickets? What would make student groups attend games? Are there any rallies of support?
Are the coaches visible with the students? Are there efforts to get students to Madison Square Garden? Should there be a free student section courtside like at Cameron with incentives to be there? Who coordinates student support?
We want to hear from more students.

Free won't make a difference in student's attending IMO. Going to games has to be an event worth attending. To my knowledge, at BC, where my son attends, very few attend basketball games, unless the opponent is Duke, NC, or Syracuse. IF the football teams wins moderately, kids attend, but plenty of alumni do nonetheless. Hockey is a big sport, so kids attend those games. The only thing in a major market that will get kids to games is winning.
 
I'm not in any way a Lavin fan, but he did make us relevant again. Getting to the tourney, players showing up in the NBA draft, and winning some Big East rivalry showdowns counts for the general NCAA basketball fan...it doesn't fly for the keen follower of day to day or even game to game SJU basketball, but our name was back out there with a coach of celebrity status. I know many of us came to loathe that fact, but his time at UCLA and then in front of the camera for several years earned him that status. Next season we need to be a bubble team being talked about at the beginning of March. The "ifs" are there for next season, Brown being a pretty big one, but more important would be the transfers we don't know about and the return of our best players from the current season. This season still has legs, and the development of Ponds, Lovett, Ahmed, Yakwe and RF are keys to our future success.

I guess it depends on how you define "relevant," but IMHO the idea that St. John's has been relevant at any point in time since Marcus Hatten is laughable.

Here are the last 13 years for you:

2003–04: 6-21, 1–15 14th
2004–05: 9–18, 3–13 12th
2005–06: 12–15, 5–11 15th
2006–07: 16–15, 7–9 11th
2007–08: 11–19, 5–13 14th
2008–09: 16–18, 6–12, 13th, CBI First Round
2009–10: 17–16, 6–12 13th NIT First Round
2010–11: 21–12, 12–6 T-3rd NCAA Second Round
2011–12: 13-19, 6–12 T-11th
2012–13: 17–16, 8–10 10th NIT Second Round
2013–14: 20–13, 10–8 T-3rd NIT First Round
2014–15: 21–12, 10–8 5th NCAA Second Round
2015–16: 8-24, 1–17 10th

I'll grant you that the Lavin Error I mean Era was the "bright spot" with a conference record 2 whole games over .500 (as compared to Norm who was 38 games under .500 in conference and Jarvis who was 4 games over).

But seriously in what world is a program that has managed to finish higher than TENTH in its conference THREE TIMES in the past thirteen years (a 5th and two 3rds) "relevant"????

If you're going by the two whole NCAA appearances (both 2nd round losses), the three NIT appearances (two first round exits and one second round) and one (gulp) first-round exit in the CBI, then I respectfully disagree. There are all sorts of programs that you wouldn't consider remotely "relevant" that have better resumes. I'm not looking it up, but if you told me that places like Iona, LIU, Monmouth, Florida Atlantic, Stephen F Austin and two dozen others have more appearances I wouldn't be one bit surprised. I'm not even including perennial basketball powers like Harvard, who are far, far more relevant that St. John's.

And it's great that Moe Harkless is playing in the NBA, but IMO one NBA player in 13 years doesn't make you relevant either.

The whole problem with St J and with the St J fan base is far too much of both are stuck in a Rocky Horror Picture Show Time Warp in which they think that 1985 was yesterday, that the whole basketball world still remembers them the way they were, and they completely fail to appreciate that it's a whole new world out there. The first step to fixing a problem is recognizing that there is one, and in this case that recognition has to include the fact that the program is totally irrelevant nationally, is largely irrelevant locally (although Chris has helped fix that), and will continue to be so until it consistently wins 20 games and goes to the NCAA tournament, and eventually makes some noise there.

When that happens, alert the media. Until then, the definition of "relevant" is highly debatable.

Amen, Seth.
 
wow lawfan, i have put up with that crap for this long? When its put on paper like that you look and say oooffah! I am getting to old for this and letting the years pass by.
 
I'm not in any way a Lavin fan, but he did make us relevant again. Getting to the tourney, players showing up in the NBA draft, and winning some Big East rivalry showdowns counts for the general NCAA basketball fan...it doesn't fly for the keen follower of day to day or even game to game SJU basketball, but our name was back out there with a coach of celebrity status. I know many of us came to loathe that fact, but his time at UCLA and then in front of the camera for several years earned him that status. Next season we need to be a bubble team being talked about at the beginning of March. The "ifs" are there for next season, Brown being a pretty big one, but more important would be the transfers we don't know about and the return of our best players from the current season. This season still has legs, and the development of Ponds, Lovett, Ahmed, Yakwe and RF are keys to our future success.

I guess it depends on how you define "relevant," but IMHO the idea that St. John's has been relevant at any point in time since Marcus Hatten is laughable.

Here are the last 13 years for you:

2003–04: 6-21, 1–15 14th
2004–05: 9–18, 3–13 12th
2005–06: 12–15, 5–11 15th
2006–07: 16–15, 7–9 11th
2007–08: 11–19, 5–13 14th
2008–09: 16–18, 6–12, 13th, CBI First Round
2009–10: 17–16, 6–12 13th NIT First Round
2010–11: 21–12, 12–6 T-3rd NCAA Second Round
2011–12: 13-19, 6–12 T-11th
2012–13: 17–16, 8–10 10th NIT Second Round
2013–14: 20–13, 10–8 T-3rd NIT First Round
2014–15: 21–12, 10–8 5th NCAA Second Round
2015–16: 8-24, 1–17 10th

I'll grant you that the Lavin Error I mean Era was the "bright spot" with a conference record 2 whole games over .500 (as compared to Norm who was 38 games under .500 in conference and Jarvis who was 4 games over).

But seriously in what world is a program that has managed to finish higher than TENTH in its conference THREE TIMES in the past thirteen years (a 5th and two 3rds) "relevant"????

If you're going by the two whole NCAA appearances (both 2nd round losses), the three NIT appearances (two first round exits and one second round) and one (gulp) first-round exit in the CBI, then I respectfully disagree. There are all sorts of programs that you wouldn't consider remotely "relevant" that have better resumes. I'm not looking it up, but if you told me that places like Iona, LIU, Monmouth, Florida Atlantic, Stephen F Austin and two dozen others have more appearances I wouldn't be one bit surprised. I'm not even including perennial basketball powers like Harvard, who are far, far more relevant that St. John's.

And it's great that Moe Harkless is playing in the NBA, but IMO one NBA player in 13 years doesn't make you relevant either.

The whole problem with St J and with the St J fan base is far too much of both are stuck in a Rocky Horror Picture Show Time Warp in which they think that 1985 was yesterday, that the whole basketball world still remembers them the way they were, and they completely fail to appreciate that it's a whole new world out there. The first step to fixing a problem is recognizing that there is one, and in this case that recognition has to include the fact that the program is totally irrelevant nationally, is largely irrelevant locally (although Chris has helped fix that), and will continue to be so until it consistently wins 20 games and goes to the NCAA tournament, and eventually makes some noise there.

When that happens, alert the media. Until then, the definition of "relevant" is highly debatable.

Amen, Seth.

Relevant doesn't mean a national powerhouse, or even a team that is consistently ranked in the top 25. Those are excellent programs, not relevant.

Relevant to me means to play a tough schedule in a tough conference, and manage to compete well and win half your conference games or better.

Relevant to me means you are in a national discussion, which we were under Lavin most seasons.

Relevant means you are at or above 20 wins in most seasons. (For Lavin 3 out of 4 that he coached, and 3 out of 5 overall)

The real question is not whether SJU was relevant during that period - we were, but whether that was acceptable to those whose head isn't stuck from 1960 to 1990 or so.

IF you disagree, it's all a matter of what you call relevant.
 
Back
Top