Does ESPN desire to crush Fox Sports impact Big East access to at large bids?
Judging by how long it took Creighton to get ranked, yes.
I have no doubt in my mind that the Big East's Top 4 could compete admirably with the ACC, Big Ten, PAC 12, AAC and Big 12s Top 4 on a neutral court anywhere in America.
Cooley might be doing the best coaching job in the nation with all he's had to deal with up there. But you won't hear about it on SportsCenter.
Disagree. In no way do I think Providence or Xavier are on the same level as 3rd or 4th teams from other conferences like Michigan/Wisconsin. Or Oklahoma state/Texas. Or even Pitt/Virginia.
And I think the top teams from those conferences are also a class above Villanova and Creighton. Nova and creighton look like sweet sixteen teams to me.
I think Georgetown can surprise people though and be a dangerous team if they get the 3rd bid from this conference. But overall, I'm not surprised the BE isn't getting a lot of attention. Even without espn's bias..the standard bearer's just aren't that great. No title contender in my eyes.
Michigan just lost at Indiana who have been big time underachievers. Take Stauskas out the game and they are easily beatable, especially without McGary.
Wisconsin isn't the same team that was rolling to start the season. Lost 4 in a row I believe. You don't think Providence can beat them?
No one takes Ok State or Texas seriously and Pitt is who they always have been beating up on lesser teams. I won't even address Virginia.
A class above Villanova when they beat Kansas on a neutral court already and were beating Cuse soundly in the Carrier Dome?
I never said we had championship teams. I said our best can compete with any team on a neutral court and I stand by that statement.
There is so much parity out there right now and I think the last thing ESPN wants to see is a 5/12 seeded matchup with one of their ACC darlings against one of our 3rd or 4th gritty BE teams.