we are sju
Active member
[quote="fordham96" post=302579][quote="we are sju" post=302571][quote="fordham96" post=302568][quote="we are sju" post=302562][quote="fordham96" post=302559]Couple of things.
1)Remember when Zach wrote that article in early spring talking about how the SJU roster coming back (assuming Ponds came back because he had just declared) had the chance to be the best since 1999 Final 8 team . Except he wrote that BEFORE SJU had landed LJ and Heron. Which shows you he actually didn't know what he was talking about. Because LJ and Heron are clearly the difference makers along with Ponds on this team. They were brilliant tonight. The freshmen Williams, Roberts and Earlington are going to struggle to get any burn against good competition. And that is why the recruiting has to pick up. They need to get more out of their freshmen.
2)Their overall team speed and perimeter talent is legit. I don't expect to make 15 threes every night but they have ballers outside the paint. I didn't care that Rutgers made a lot of 3 against their first 2 opponents, they haven't faced talent like SJU has on the perimeter. SJU was going to make them guard them all over the court and that made it difficult for them.
3)Now the downside. Again Rutgers is picked to finish dead last in the Big 10 for a reason. They have a lot of holes. SJU is going to eventually face teams that will exploit their weaknesses. They will face teams that can go inside and out and will make some early 3's that will force SJU to stay honest on perimeter. Keita will need to come back and help. I don't see Roberts or Earlington developing fast enough to help.[/quote]
On the downside note we won by 20 really w/o Ponds doing much. I agree about fools gold threes and talented big teams giving us a problem. Just think winning dominantly w/o our best player having a normal game does kind of balance the other stuff out.[/quote]
I love Ponds I am just not sure how much better he is than Heron or even LJ. My point is they all are not going to score 25 points each night. So the tradeoff for Ponds scoring 8 was both LJ and Heron accounting for over 50 themselves. So I don't see it so much as a bright spot that they won despite Ponds' light load tonight.[/quote]
Ponds driving the ball is still our best shot IMO. Thought was a real good sign he did not force while LJ and Heron went crazy[/quote]
My point is they probably need to get 55-60 points each night against tough competition from LJ, Heron and Ponds to win. The ultimate distribution of those points is not important to me (meaning next game could be Ponds with 25, Heron with 20 and LJ with 15) I mean Ponds scored tonight 8 tonight but that is with Heron scoring 27 and LJ scoring 23. That is 58 combined for the 3 of them. If Ponds scored say 15 more tonight don't think the other two would have had the same numbers it would have probably come at the EXPENSE of the other two not in addition. Now when they win a game against a solid team and say BOTH Heron and Ponds score less than 10 then you have something That probably means Mikey Dixon stepped up big time off the bench.[/quote]
I get your point. I like LJ and if we are still including him with the other two by BE time than we really will be good. At this point in time I still have Ponds / Heron as needing to get 40 combined no matter what for us to win.. Which is why winning convincingly w/o Ponds going off was a really good sign. I just need more than 3 games before I trust LJ with the other 2.
1)Remember when Zach wrote that article in early spring talking about how the SJU roster coming back (assuming Ponds came back because he had just declared) had the chance to be the best since 1999 Final 8 team . Except he wrote that BEFORE SJU had landed LJ and Heron. Which shows you he actually didn't know what he was talking about. Because LJ and Heron are clearly the difference makers along with Ponds on this team. They were brilliant tonight. The freshmen Williams, Roberts and Earlington are going to struggle to get any burn against good competition. And that is why the recruiting has to pick up. They need to get more out of their freshmen.
2)Their overall team speed and perimeter talent is legit. I don't expect to make 15 threes every night but they have ballers outside the paint. I didn't care that Rutgers made a lot of 3 against their first 2 opponents, they haven't faced talent like SJU has on the perimeter. SJU was going to make them guard them all over the court and that made it difficult for them.
3)Now the downside. Again Rutgers is picked to finish dead last in the Big 10 for a reason. They have a lot of holes. SJU is going to eventually face teams that will exploit their weaknesses. They will face teams that can go inside and out and will make some early 3's that will force SJU to stay honest on perimeter. Keita will need to come back and help. I don't see Roberts or Earlington developing fast enough to help.[/quote]
On the downside note we won by 20 really w/o Ponds doing much. I agree about fools gold threes and talented big teams giving us a problem. Just think winning dominantly w/o our best player having a normal game does kind of balance the other stuff out.[/quote]
I love Ponds I am just not sure how much better he is than Heron or even LJ. My point is they all are not going to score 25 points each night. So the tradeoff for Ponds scoring 8 was both LJ and Heron accounting for over 50 themselves. So I don't see it so much as a bright spot that they won despite Ponds' light load tonight.[/quote]
Ponds driving the ball is still our best shot IMO. Thought was a real good sign he did not force while LJ and Heron went crazy[/quote]
My point is they probably need to get 55-60 points each night against tough competition from LJ, Heron and Ponds to win. The ultimate distribution of those points is not important to me (meaning next game could be Ponds with 25, Heron with 20 and LJ with 15) I mean Ponds scored tonight 8 tonight but that is with Heron scoring 27 and LJ scoring 23. That is 58 combined for the 3 of them. If Ponds scored say 15 more tonight don't think the other two would have had the same numbers it would have probably come at the EXPENSE of the other two not in addition. Now when they win a game against a solid team and say BOTH Heron and Ponds score less than 10 then you have something That probably means Mikey Dixon stepped up big time off the bench.[/quote]
I get your point. I like LJ and if we are still including him with the other two by BE time than we really will be good. At this point in time I still have Ponds / Heron as needing to get 40 combined no matter what for us to win.. Which is why winning convincingly w/o Ponds going off was a really good sign. I just need more than 3 games before I trust LJ with the other 2.