Rose is known best for his baseball play but second to that is his gambling addiction and more importantly, the associated lying about it; not just lying but using his celebrity to go on national TV shows for years and years to lie about it. For gambling on games that he managed for the Reds and lying about it even in the face of hard evidence, not anecdotal, but betting slips and bank records. Gambling is one thing, even on baseball games, but gambling on events you have direct involvement in the outcome is quite another. And the nonsense that he only bet on the Reds to win is just that, nonsense, because even if true, the decisions a lifelong addicted gambler would make to win today’s wagered on game would, IMO, be quite different than decisions you might make otherwise and would have a direct affect on the result of tomorrows unwagered game.
And many believe, including myself, that the ONLY reason he finally admitted to the gambling on baseball in general and on Reds games specifically was to increase sales for the book he published revealing “the truth”.
IMO, all of that has to be taken into account before praising Rose as a role model because he played a game very hard and very well. He never stopped gambling, never had a moment of contrition, never stopped complaining about what the life long ban from baseball HE AGREED TO AND SIGNED cost him personally.
Life is much more a judge of character than the way one played a kids game. To me Rose was not a sympathetic person at all, to me, for me, you can just leave out the “sym”.