Just noticed that? LOL
Yes, this is supposed to be the best class in history, and it may well be. But they weren't exactly lacking in the past either
2009 2 of top 3, 3 of top 20 35-3 Elite 8
2010 2 of top 10, 4 of top 25 29-9 Final 4
2011 3 of top 7, 4 of top 20 38-2 Champs
2012 3 of top 10, 4 of top 30 21-12, 17-7 with Noel, 1st round NIT
2013 5 of top 10., 6 of top 20 TBA
He just had a bigger class to fill but they're still freshman who have to prove it on the court against real competition. That works out sometimes and sometimes it doesn't. The fact that they have Cauley-Stein and Pothyress returning plus, to a lesser extent, Hood should help a lot as there's some experience there. The returnees, Jones, Lamb and Miller, are what made the championship team special. Could be the same this year.
Why is it funny that I just noticed?
Sorry, I just assume that everyone who posts on the board is a somewhat knowledgeable college basketball fan. I guess I should read more posts to knock that idea out of my head.
And I assumed anyone that used LOL was a teenaged girl.
The thing I don't get about that is if it's the deepest draft in years then why do you need to tank? Is Wiggins that much more of a sure thing than Randle or Harrison or Parker or Smart or Harris or GRIII or . . . . .
The thing I don't get about that is if it's the deepest draft in years then why do you need to tank? Is Wiggins that much more of a sure thing than Randle or Harrison or Parker or Smart or Harris or GRIII or . . . . .
Lottery is for the first three picks. As I understand it, of the teams that don't make the playoffs, the worse your record, the more balls you get and the higher chance you have of getting one of those three picks. I believe the first 14 picks go to the non playoff teams unless they've traded those rights. So hypothetically you tank to not make the playoffs and you tank really bad if you want to increase your shot at a lottery pick.
That is correct, the 14 teams are alive for the top 3 picks, after that the next 11 are positioned based on won/loss. I still remember back in 85 when the rumor was that the league fixed the draft so the Knicks could draft Ewing
The thing I don't get about that is if it's the deepest draft in years then why do you need to tank? Is Wiggins that much more of a sure thing than Randle or Harrison or Parker or Smart or Harris or GRIII or . . . . .
Lottery is for the first three picks. As I understand it, of the teams that don't make the playoffs, the worse your record, the more balls you get and the higher chance you have of getting one of those three picks. I believe the first 14 picks go to the non playoff teams unless they've traded those rights. So hypothetically you tank to not make the playoffs and you tank really bad if you want to increase your shot at a lottery pick.
As a season ticket holder/fan I'd be pissed if my team had a chance for the last playoff spot and instead forced itself to lose 60 games.
That is correct, the 14 teams are alive for the top 3 picks, after that the next 11 are positioned based on won/loss. I still remember back in 85 when the rumor was that the league fixed the draft so the Knicks could draft Ewing
I'm far from a conspiracy theorists-type, but something seemed a bit fishy.
The thing I don't get about that is if it's the deepest draft in years then why do you need to tank? Is Wiggins that much more of a sure thing than Randle or Harrison or Parker or Smart or Harris or GRIII or . . . . .
Lottery is for the first three picks. As I understand it, of the teams that don't make the playoffs, the worse your record, the more balls you get and the higher chance you have of getting one of those three picks. I believe the first 14 picks go to the non playoff teams unless they've traded those rights. So hypothetically you tank to not make the playoffs and you tank really bad if you want to increase your shot at a lottery pick.
That is correct, the 14 teams are alive for the top 3 picks, after that the next 11 are positioned based on won/loss. I still remember back in 85 when the rumor was that the league fixed the draft so the Knicks could draft Ewing
The thing I don't get about that is if it's the deepest draft in years then why do you need to tank? Is Wiggins that much more of a sure thing than Randle or Harrison or Parker or Smart or Harris or GRIII or . . . . .
Lottery is for the first three picks. As I understand it, of the teams that don't make the playoffs, the worse your record, the more balls you get and the higher chance you have of getting one of those three picks. I believe the first 14 picks go to the non playoff teams unless they've traded those rights. So hypothetically you tank to not make the playoffs and you tank really bad if you want to increase your shot at a lottery pick.
That is correct, the 14 teams are alive for the top 3 picks, after that the next 11 are positioned based on won/loss. I still remember back in 85 when the rumor was that the league fixed the draft so the Knicks could draft Ewing
What are the other 5 based on?
First you're kind of correct but the lottery are all the teams with balls in the cage, the first three are just the lottery winners. And I understand all that but the worst team in the playoffs gets the 15th pick. In a very deep draft, and it looks like there will be quality into the 2nd round if prognosticators are correct, I just don't see the benefit. It's a deep draft, not a top heavy one. There's no Anthony Davis/Lebron/Yao/Dwight/etc.... I was suggesting that while Wiggins may be great, hard to say since he hasn't played a game and isn't necessarily a dominating physical specimen, are he and Parker and the KY guys definitely going to be a better NBA players than some of the guys projected to go 10-20 like Selden, Harris, McGary and Isiaih Austin (who coincidentally - or not - was one of last year's few "can't miss" NBA prospects along with Shabazz Muhammad, Noel and Kyle, and we all know how that worked out)? I don't think so.
The lottery is supposed to keep people from tanking of course. But in order to guarantee a top 5 pick you have to be one of the two worst teams. That's a large price to pay if you're not really that bad. As a season ticket holder/fan I'd be pissed if my team had a chance for the last playoff spot and instead forced itself to lose 60 games.
The thing I don't get about that is if it's the deepest draft in years then why do you need to tank? Is Wiggins that much more of a sure thing than Randle or Harrison or Parker or Smart or Harris or GRIII or . . . . .
Lottery is for the first three picks. As I understand it, of the teams that don't make the playoffs, the worse your record, the more balls you get and the higher chance you have of getting one of those three picks. I believe the first 14 picks go to the non playoff teams unless they've traded those rights. So hypothetically you tank to not make the playoffs and you tank really bad if you want to increase your shot at a lottery pick.
That is correct, the 14 teams are alive for the top 3 picks, after that the next 11 are positioned based on won/loss. I still remember back in 85 when the rumor was that the league fixed the draft so the Knicks could draft Ewing
What are the other 5 based on?
The top 3 (out of the 14 that don't make playoffs) and picked out of the ping pong balls...the 11 that are left are placed based on their win loss. I'm not sure which 5 you mean
First you're kind of correct but the lottery are all the teams with balls in the cage, the first three are just the lottery winners. And I understand all that but the worst team in the playoffs gets the 15th pick. In a very deep draft, and it looks like there will be quality into the 2nd round if prognosticators are correct, I just don't see the benefit. It's a deep draft, not a top heavy one. There's no Anthony Davis/Lebron/Yao/Dwight/etc.... I was suggesting that while Wiggins may be great, hard to say since he hasn't played a game and isn't necessarily a dominating physical specimen, are he and Parker and the KY guys definitely going to be a better NBA players than some of the guys projected to go 10-20 like Selden, Harris, McGary and Isiaih Austin (who coincidentally - or not - was one of last year's few "can't miss" NBA prospects along with Shabazz Muhammad, Noel and Kyle, and we all know how that worked out)? I don't think so.
The lottery is supposed to keep people from tanking of course. But in order to guarantee a top 5 pick you have to be one of the two worst teams. That's a large price to pay if you're not really that bad. As a season ticket holder/fan I'd be pissed if my team had a chance for the last playoff spot and instead forced itself to lose 60 games.
The way it is shaking up right now is both deep and top heavy. So you've got a lot of talent but you've also got 3-5 players that are projecting as perennial all stars and those are the stakes they are jockeying for.
They need to win it all to be considered the best class ever, and I don't think they will.
True, and don't think they have a chance to do that. They just don't have enough veterans like Cal's other wildly successful teams. Those teams had at least two draftable upperclassmen.
Darius Miller was the only player on the championship team playing in more than their 2nd season. Isn't that an upperclassman?
They need to win it all to be considered the best class ever, and I don't think they will.
True, and don't think they have a chance to do that. They just don't have enough veterans like Cal's other wildly successful teams. Those teams had at least two draftable upperclassmen.
Darius Miller was the only player on the championship team playing in more than their 2nd season. Isn't that an upperclassman?
That national championship team actually had SR Josh Harrellson (drafted), SR Eloy Vargas, SR Darius Miller (drafted), JR Jon Hood (and a few other upperclassmen walkon or walkon types that didn't play much). The year before they had Deandre Liggins. At Memphis, Cal's 2008 Final Four team had JR Robert Dozier (drafted) SR Joey Dorsey (drafted) JR Antonio Anderson (made Bobcats for a bit) and JR Chris Douglas-Roberts (drafted). Those were all starters. SR Andre Allen played a big role off the bench. They also had a guy named Derrick Rose.
It think UK's haul is ridiculous, but as good as they are, they don't have a kid that is just insane like Rose, Davis, or even Wall.
They need to win it all to be considered the best class ever, and I don't think they will.
True, and don't think they have a chance to do that. They just don't have enough veterans like Cal's other wildly successful teams. Those teams had at least two draftable upperclassmen.
Darius Miller was the only player on the championship team playing in more than their 2nd season. Isn't that an upperclassman?
That national championship team actually had SR Josh Harrellson (drafted), SR Eloy Vargas, SR Darius Miller (drafted), JR Jon Hood (and a few other upperclassmen walkon or walkon types that didn't play much). The year before they had Deandre Liggins. At Memphis, Cal's 2008 Final Four team had JR Robert Dozier (drafted) SR Joey Dorsey (drafted) JR Antonio Anderson (made Bobcats for a bit) and JR Chris Douglas-Roberts (drafted). Those were all starters. SR Andre Allen played a big role off the bench. They also had a guy named Derrick Rose.
It think UK's haul is ridiculous, but as good as they are, they don't have a kid that is just insane like Rose, Davis, or even Wall.
I think you have your teams mixed up. Harrelson, Knight, Hood and Liggins were on the team that lost to Kemba in the Final Four.
That team didn't have a Rose, Davis or Wall either.
The following were perennial all stars before playing their first college game the past few years (as well as the four from last year mentioned above): Austin Rivers, Bradley Beal, Quincy Miller, Harrison Barnes, Xavier Henry, Jrue HOliday, Samardo Samuels, etc, etc, etc) Tanking a season for guys who are not head and shoulders above the others physically and who haven't played a game against real competition yet is a fool's quest IMVHO. Then again, it's NBA execs we're talking about so if the dunce cap fits . . .
The following were perennial all stars before playing their first college game the past few years (as well as the four from last year mentioned above): Austin Rivers, Bradley Beal, Quincy Miller, Harrison Barnes, Xavier Henry, Jrue HOliday, Samardo Samuels, etc, etc, etc) Tanking a season for guys who are not head and shoulders above the others physically and who haven't played a game against real competition yet is a fool's quest IMVHO. Then again, it's NBA execs we're talking about so if the dunce cap fits . . .
I'm just conveying the reasoning not promoting it.
The following were perennial all stars before playing their first college game the past few years (as well as the four from last year mentioned above): Austin Rivers, Bradley Beal, Quincy Miller, Harrison Barnes, Xavier Henry, Jrue HOliday, Samardo Samuels, etc, etc, etc) Tanking a season for guys who are not head and shoulders above the others physically and who haven't played a game against real competition yet is a fool's quest IMVHO. Then again, it's NBA execs we're talking about so if the dunce cap fits . . .
I'm just conveying the reasoning not promoting it.
Understood Paul, but take a stance. Do you agree with me or not? I need to know!![]()