@Providence, Wed. Jan. 25, 6:30pm, FS1/570AM

Great game and awesome win!

No doubt there are some good ones out there, but college refs are typically college refs because they aren’t very good refs. Those 3 made an absolute mockery of that game last night. Glad we came out on the winning side.

Credit to Mullin for aggressively using those timeouts when he did and not worrying about saving any. If he had saved them it might have been for nothing. We were on the ropes (22 points allowed and however many turnovers a little over 6 mins into the 2nd half turning a 9 point halftime lead into a 6 point deficit) and if we didn’t try to stabilize it as many times as we could then we might not have been able to.

A comforting thing about this team’s prospects the next few months and certainly next year is that they make it so much harder than it needs to be. They do so many things wrong and still find a way to win some of these games. Allow 62% shooting from the field, turn the ball over 17 times (sometimes multiple possessions in a row), don’t stop the ball on defense, over-extend defensively, all sorts of missed assignments defensively leading to dunks and open 3s, so many no pass or 1 pass possessions, and we might be one of the first teams in the history of basketball to have a miscommunication on whether or not we wanted one of our best players to foul (and foul out) with 1:36 to go when we just took a 1 point lead. It’s like if usually takes 100% to win a game we have to give 120% to get there. Cutting out that 20% should not be that difficult which gives me reason for optimism.

Even with this when our guards go like they went last night feel like we can mix it up with a lot of teams. Feel like when we get 40+ from them we have a chance a lot of nights.

A lot of credit to Owens, Williams, and Ahmed, who really compete inside despite often playing out of position and undersized.

Pretty incredible that they are at 4 conference wins halfway through the conference slate. Had them at 7-11 before the season and would love to see them get there, would be such marked progress from last year even despite the bad losses (and how poor some of the not-bad losses have been). Getting ahead, but would almost be ideal given where we are to finish 7th, get DePaul in the first round, and maybe line us up with Butler (team at top of conference I think we match up best with) in Quarters of BET.

Great road win. That said, hopefully we continue to consistently get back on defense quickly, especially after scores. Trading baskets worked last night, but can't rely on us shooting so well most nights. Lastly, our talented guards learning to stop the ball consistently v teams that run will benefit us greatly. End to end penetration puts more pressure on our thin interior in foul department.

Agree. Hoping this win can restart the momentum we had after Cuse/Butler/DePaul that was frankly difficult timing and the wheels fell off a bit after Creighton. It's not like the timing is much better now but 3 of the next 4 are at home. Would be great to sustain the level of intensity displayed last night over that stretch even in losses.

Getting (1) all the way back on defense, not stopping 25+ feet from basket or just drifting to your man, but as a team protecting the rim first and the paint second, and then picking up your man out to the 3 point line; and (2) doing so quickly might be two of the lowest hanging fruits that seem like they can be addressed right now and pay immediate dividends. Improve that and eliminate some of the senseless fouling and right away you're putting yourself in a lot easier position in these games.

In fairness Providence was on 83 with just under 4 to go and finished with 86. Thought Lovett/Ponds in particular put incredible pressure on Providence's backcourt during that stretch, which was only more impressive given the minutes and energy they had expended to that point. But in general I think our pressure has been a little too high risk/high reward, at least in terms of longer stretches (and not targeted situational use). Coupled with our issues getting back discussed above it's just been leading to way too many odd man runouts and easy hoops.
 
Big win on the road!
Except for the defensive lapses we have little to complain about.
Lovett looks 100% again and Ellison keeps showing improvement.
Mully is starting to realize that Yakwe is  much too small to play the 5 and it remains our Achilles heal but a winded Williams more than made up for his absence in the second half.
I can only blame a momentary lapse in judgment by Mullin for insanely playing Mussini and Alibegovic at the same time which rendered us 3 against 5 on defense.
To be fair, Providence shot 62% for the game, and 40% from 3. I don't think FM and AA playing together had much of a negative impact...

Providence began to post up Mussini as soon as he entered the game. Neither of our Euros can guard anyone in the Big East.


You can add RF to that list as well

Mark, I think they are three different situations.

Mussini has the heart but not the body.
RF is a young colt but I watched him last night make the effort and think he may grow in to Big East body.
Amar seems to have Kyle Cuffe disease and can not make himself play through contact.

Kyle Cuffe insulted. :)

Re Mussini, whenever he was in the game PC just posted him up. I know we have to give him modest minutes when other guards are in foul trouble, but you just can't continue to have him abused so easily. Doubling on the post is one thing, but helping Mussini out would further reduce defensive efficiency. With addition of Simon, I believe Mussini will read the tea leaves.

Perhaps to be proven wrong, I believe Freudenberg will be ok in coming years. Must say his shot, once thought to be his strength, is MIA.
 
Cooley was annoyed at the refs & wandered from hand shake line, From what I gather, he respects Mullin. He had no use for Lavin however.
 
Great to see these guys pull out a tough road game vs a competitive Providence team (wins over GTown and SH), prob another example of a team we match up well against. Any team with a fairly dominant front court is gonna be real issue for us.

One thing that had me confused last night (other than the complete no show in the first 5 mins of the second half), what was the pressure that Ellison was performing for the entire 1st half? It looked like a semblance of an attempt to trap the ball handler....but Lovett looked confused as to why he was coming over- a simple over the top pass broke it and put us out of position on D. Anyone else perplexed by that?

Also- Mussini receives a bit of hate on here, but cmon- last night he was not put in a position to succeed at all against Lindsay- 6'7 240... I actually think that all three 6ft guards can play at the same time with a Williams/Owens, Owens/Yakwe combo. throw a 3-2 zone at during that time.

Overall- can't take away the fight these guys showed when Prov looked they were gonna blow it open. Enjoy this, as these victories are few and far between this year.
 
besides being very hot from the field and free throw line, a key was williams helping out in the paint. very key. we must remember that when these shots don't fall, high % shots is a must. ellison drove to basket much more and opened up perimeter for us. big shots fell late for us. boys played gritty. again, good subs in/out by staff. a sign of the future, stop all the transfer madness!
 
Was there a heated confrontation between the two after the game in the tunnel?

It could just be Internet rumors, but with the way Cooley acts on the sidelines it would not surprise me in the least.

And if Mullin did not back down that is a very good sign, especially for those on here that think he is not engaged because he sports a calm and cool disposition on the sidelines

This from the PC boards:

Sister sent my a text after the game. Apparently she knows someone directly related with the team.
From my understanding, in the tunnel Cooley said to one of our guys "Those MFer's stole that one, huh?" and Mullin heard him and responded "F$ck you b%tch". Cooley apparently said "No, f$ck YOU, b%tch" which then resulted in players from both sides having to hold the coaches back.
Cooley might not be a great or even very good X's and O's guy, but it did make me feel a little better after a brutal loss.
 
Was there a heated confrontation between the two after the game in the tunnel?

It could just be Internet rumors, but with the way Cooley acts on the sidelines it would not surprise me in the least.

And if Mullin did not back down that is a very good sign, especially for those on here that think he is not engaged because he sports a calm and cool disposition on the sidelines

This from the PC boards:

Sister sent my a text after the game. Apparently she knows someone directly related with the team.
From my understanding, in the tunnel Cooley said to one of our guys "Those MFer's stole that one, huh?" and Mullin heard him and responded "F$ck you b%tch". Cooley apparently said "No, f$ck YOU, b%tch" which then resulted in players from both sides having to hold the coaches back.
Cooley might not be a great or even very good X's and O's guy, but it did make me feel a little better after a brutal loss.

Cooley pulled a Fraschilla and dissed Mullin in the handshake line. Mullin stopped one of the Prov. assistants to ask what was up. Intentional or not it was a douchebag move not worthy of a Big East head coach.
 
Was there a heated confrontation between the two after the game in the tunnel?

It could just be Internet rumors, but with the way Cooley acts on the sidelines it would not surprise me in the least.

And if Mullin did not back down that is a very good sign, especially for those on here that think he is not engaged because he sports a calm and cool disposition on the sidelines

This from the PC boards:

Sister sent my a text after the game. Apparently she knows someone directly related with the team.
From my understanding, in the tunnel Cooley said to one of our guys "Those MFer's stole that one, huh?" and Mullin heard him and responded "F$ck you b%tch". Cooley apparently said "No, f$ck YOU, b%tch" which then resulted in players from both sides having to hold the coaches back.
Cooley might not be a great or even very good X's and O's guy, but it did make me feel a little better after a brutal loss.

Cooley pulled a Fraschilla and dissed Mullin in the handshake line. Mullin stopped one of the Prov. assistants to ask what was up. Intentional or not it was a douchebag move not worthy of a Big East head coach.

Well said Paul
 
Was there a heated confrontation between the two after the game in the tunnel?

It could just be Internet rumors, but with the way Cooley acts on the sidelines it would not surprise me in the least.

And if Mullin did not back down that is a very good sign, especially for those on here that think he is not engaged because he sports a calm and cool disposition on the sidelines

This from the PC boards:

Sister sent my a text after the game. Apparently she knows someone directly related with the team.
From my understanding, in the tunnel Cooley said to one of our guys "Those MFer's stole that one, huh?" and Mullin heard him and responded "F$ck you b%tch". Cooley apparently said "No, f$ck YOU, b%tch" which then resulted in players from both sides having to hold the coaches back.
Cooley might not be a great or even very good X's and O's guy, but it did make me feel a little better after a brutal loss.

You can take the kid out of Brooklyn..........
 
Cooley is a good coach but a terrible loser. He used to pull the same stuff with Lavin, even though his teams got the better of Lavin in the biggest spots they played each other. And apparently he does the same stuff with Danny Hurley and others.
 
Cooley pulled a Fraschilla and dissed Mullin in the handshake line. Mullin stopped one of the Prov. assistants to ask what was up. Intentional or not it was a douchebag move not worthy of a Big East head coach.

Mullin did the same thing after the Delaware State game.
 
Cooley is a bit younger but Mullin has a significant reach advantage and would jab-jab-jab with the right, seeking an opening for the left. If Cooley was smart, he would go full blown rope-a-dope and tire Mullin out. The key for Chris would be patience, wait for an opening and don't let it become a brawl. I doubt it goes the distance, our guy wins easily.

Cooley seems to have eyes or something in the back of his head so that would be a disadvantage for Mo for sure.
 
Back
Top