I just wonder how many elite coaches, if judged by their team's performance 6 games into their second season's conference schedule, would also be judged harshly.
Granted, for every guy fired in year 4 or 5, likely the performance was not good in year 1 or 2, and their terminations often seem 1 or 2 seasons late (see NR after 6 seasons).
Criticism is valid for fans. I can pretty much guarantee that CMA and staff are inwardly not happy with the team's performance. Our only response is complaining publicly. Their response is working hard in practice, continue teaching, make lineup changes when appropriate, and continually evaluate which of their guys should have a role going forward.
This is all pretty standard in the life of a coach.
Years ago I attended a coaching clinic at CA that Norm Roberts hosted for CYO coaches in the Brooklyn Queens diocese. Bittersweet memory is that Glen Williams was a CYO coach in attendance, and Norm called him out of the stands to demonstrate a particular skill. Glen is gone way too soon. But I digress.
Norm said something poignant to CYO coaches in attendance: "What you guys are trying to do with your kids, teaching them basketball, and helpping them grow as young adults is not much different than what I am doing here at St. John's. We are all coaches. The main difference is though, I get paid a lot of money to do my job, and if I don't win enough, they can fire me."
CMA knows this and can take the heat. After a lifetime in basketball, he is used to it, knows it, and understands it.
We all wish him well.