Watched Pistol from the time he was at LSU. Actually still have his rookie card. No doubt one of the most unique(possibly the most unique) talents to ever play the game, but IMO no way was he even close to one of the 10 best players of all time. I'd question whether he deserves to even be on the top 50 list. During the time he played, I would have taken West, Clyde(granted he was a point guard) and a number of other guards over Pistol. In 10 seasons as a pro, I think Pete only played on one team with a winning record. No doubt a tremendously talented entertainer, but Pete came 1st and the team a distant 2nd.
Thanks for the correction on his age at his death. 40! Damn.
I would agree with your assessment as a pro, but he did play on a lot of bad teams until he went to the Celtics as a spare part, much like Walton late in his career. Auerbach had a knack for acquiring older players (like Charlie Scott and Paul Silas) who had some of their finest moments as part of great Celtic teams.
I always felt that had he not played for his father Press at LSU, he wouldn't have been permitted to hoist so many shots.
Your assessment compared to other NBA greats is very fair. West, Frazier, Oscar Robertson, Monroe were all in a different class.
Still, there was never a player who could do so much with a ball in their hands. Then or now. HORSE anyone?
I used the word "unique", but the word "innovative" is probably a little more apropos. After some thought, I'd have to consider Dr. J the most innovative player I've ever seen, although I admit to being partial(Dr. J was and still is my favorite player of all time). When I first saw him playing for the Squires against the Nets, I was in complete awe of the things he was capable of doing with a ball in his hands. Different skill set then Pistol, of course. Later my dream came true when he was traded to the Nets. Magic Johnson is another one of the more innovative players I've ever seen.
For a long time, I thought Erving at his prime was better than Jordan. Of course, in the final analysis, it's a ludicrous assertion. However, Erving did things with a ball that hadn't been done before simply because no one could. Things like holding the ball single handed like a grapfruit as he gracefully soared to the hoop. Or, possessing such incredible hang time that he appeared to still be in the air when he took off first, and his defenders had halready descended to the hardwood. Amazing talent, and watching him in his prime was a thing of beauty.
Most innovative ever? To me, Earl monroe. No one had ever spun before Monroe did. Early in his pro career, he accelerated right, then halted and yanked the ball backwards, freezing a defender as he spun by him. The opposing coach screamed at the ref - "Call something!!" The ref responded, "I don't know what to call - i never saw it before." Thank goodness it was considered totally legal, and Monroe, never one of the fastest players in the league, was one of the quickest. His ability to shoot and make shots with a defender draped all over him caused Marv Alpert to invent the emphatic description "Facial!" to describe the embarrassment of not being able to stop Monroe with the Pearl shooting the ball right in your face.
Everyone in a schoolyard could try to imitate Monroe, down to his shuffling, sauntering gait, and almost all kids tried. Erving was inimitable, simply because the amazing things he did required abilities and anatomy no one possessed.
Still and all, at a time when few white players could provide razzle dazzle, Pistol Pete was a magician with the ball, and an example that white guards didn't all have to be cookie cutter, simply fundamentally sound players.