Nov 8, 2016 - The lesser of two evils?
- Thread starter TX Redman
- Start date
- Status
Are you kidding me? Since this absolutely horrible beyond classless post has been up for 2 1/2 hours I guess openly wishing for the murder of another human being is perfectly okay on the site. For your sake I hope you never lose any member of your household in such a horrible manner. You should be ashamed of yourself but anyone who could make such a callous statement probably can't even spell shame never mind feel it.
redfan259999888
Active member
Hey, I have no regrets voting Trump. Anyone over that murderer Hillary.
LOL the libs are still obsessed with Trump, it's ashame they can't get over it lol.
HEHEHEEE
I'm also a pacifist. I just want the guy deposed and he and his cabal arrested. He's a walking daily violation of the 'Emoluments Clause' in the Constitution of which the throngs of Republican 'Originalists' have incurred a massive dosage of amnesia about.
And, trust me, he and his campaign colluded with the Ruskies to throw the election.
Time and some people with courage (and massive cojones) would prove that.
Amen.
And, trust me, he and his campaign colluded with the Ruskies to throw the election.
Time and some people with courage (and massive cojones) would prove that.
Amen.
beast of the east
Active member
Why on earth would the Russians want Trump in office over the left wing Clinton, who allowed Putin to do whatever he wanted without repercussion?
ErickTheRed
Member
So five years ago Obama mocked Romney for saying Russia posed a threat saying go back to the Cold War, all the libs laughed and yuked it up....5 years later 4 plus under Obama the same libs think Russia is our biggest foe/threat and with that thinking its strictly obamas doing.
ErickTheRed
Member
I now watch the news to amuse myself, since my met season is over!
I agree with your sentiment about the call for assassination but disagree with the tacit appeal to censorship. In the first place, I believe without qualification in the free and fair exchange of opinion in the marketplace of ideas. No matter how repulsive the opinion, and that would be as opposed to those on the left, who think that the utterance of sentiments that they find distasteful are grounds for censorship - eg the shouting down of Ann Coulter or Charles Murray - or violence - as in California where today a masked college professor was arrested for the hate crime of assaulting Trump supporters with a bicycle lock - or prison, as in calls by members of the US congress for the jailing of those who express doubts about the hoax that is global warming.
Which leads to the second argument against removing the post, which is that it perfectly encapsulates the infantilism of the liberal mind. To the extent that they see those with whom they disagree as human, they see them as an evil that needs to be eradicated. The left regards their political beliefs in the same way Medieval Christians regarded papal dogma and think that those who disagree with them are heretics who should be burned at the stake. The irony is that they call themselves progressive, whereas they think and act like primitives.
A poster who otherwise behaves normally has called for the murder of a game show host because he disagrees with the game show host's politics - politics which it's unlikely the game show host believes in himself. Which is the thing: the easiest way to make a liberal look like a fool is to encourage him to keep talking. Delete it? I don't think they should delete it. I think they should make it a sticky.
Think you are close to the truth but doubt that Trump himself colluded with Russians. If the evidence starts to push numbers like 60 House seats lost to Republicans and solid Dem Senate, he may look for way out in name of his cause being betrayed by inexperienced operatives or Russian agents. Think Trump knows the price of everything and the value of nothing. May be hungry to use his role as former President to make as much money as he can.
L J S A
Well-known member
I would hope that anyone who laughed about it realizes that Russia is never not a threat -- there are just lulls in the action. Whether that lull was a result of a down Russian economy or cold war expert Condi Rice being in the administration, I'm not sure. But I suppose you could also say at the same time that her lack of Middle East expertise caused other issues. There was definitely too much complacency regarding Russia during the Obama years, particularly at the beginning of his first term.
Hillary was a terrible candidate. I really had to hold my nose while casting that vote.
That said, when does she cease being the measuring stick? When does her actions, scandals and platforms cease being the retort for all judgements cast upon Trump? If the point is that Trump is better than one of the worst politicians you could ever imagine, what exactly does that prove?
Except for [strike]Mr Ed[/strike] Chelsea - who earned 600 thousand dollars from NBC for interviewing the Geico Gecko - none of the Clintons has had a private sector job in 30 years, not since Hillary was a rain maker for the Rose Law firm, where she met Chelsea's father, Webb Hubbell. Despite which Bill and Hillary are now worth 110 million dollars. The difference between them and Trump is that he's a greedy capitalist, whereas they're selfless public servants.
- Status