Nov 8, 2016 - The lesser of two evils?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Isn't it rather obvious that there are no victims to the left? There is only an agenda......

Wut? The left comprises entirely victims: blacks are victims of whites, women are victims of men, illegal aliens are victims of xenophobes, Muslims are victims of the crusades and the jews, LGBGTQWERTIES are victims of CISsies, union members are victims of robber barons, criminals are victims of poverty, the poor are victims of the one percent, it goes on and on. And where no victims exist they invent them: gang rapes at dook and UVA and the Matthew Shepherd Hate Crimes Prevention Act and mattress girl and hundreds of debunked and staged nooses in trees and swastikas on dorm room doors and burka wearers assaulted on trains.

The left's agenda is to confer victim status on everyone because if everyone is a victim of something that no one is personally responsible for anything. The amelioration of victimhood becomes the goal of governance and hence a justification for the expansion of the government they control and the diminution of personal liberty, which they hate. It's Stalinism with a smiley face and it's all for your own good and if you don't bend over and take it you're evil: you're a racist and a misogynist and a homophobe; rather than being a victim you're beyond redemption.
 
On another subject, the whole Elizabeth Warren was a smokescreen at best.

As usual there is a story behind the story. Sessions investigated and brought charges in a small overhwelmingly black district where in a particular election there were more write in ballots than in the entire city of Birmingham in the same period. So Sessions investigated and brought charges against three individuals - one a close friend of Coretta Scott King. In her letter, she claimed racial bias on the part of Sessions, but it is hard to figure out why when both candidates were black in a predominately black district.

As usual, Warren was grandstanding in an attempt to throw stones. In Warren's case, we all know the story of glass houses. With a little luck, whether the next Senator from Massachusetts is a Democrat or Republican, she will be banished from office, where she can take her Phony Native American ass back to HArvard, and teach students how to steal titles of homes from those with tax liens against them.

Beast, I am not an Elizabeth Warren fan, but I think that was a generous version of the "Marion Case" in Perry County. From everything that I read, Jeff Sessions lost that case with a predominantly white jury (which he secured by moving the trial 160 miles) because he was exceptionally aggressive. It is part of the reason that even republicans did not vote to confirm him as a Federal District Judge in 1986. That case is less about the candidates (who I have trouble finding) and more about voter intimidation. Regardless, Jeff Sessions' track record is littered with examples that indicate a questionable (at best) stance on civil rights.

On another note, regardless of which side of the aisle you fall, I hope we will collectively mind check and balances. With both houses in lock step with the executive branch, even the conservative-minded should desire an independent Judicial Branch.

My understanding of the Perry County case is the conflict between the rule of law against actual or perceived racism. There was evidence of ballot tampering (even admitted) because absentee ballots were changed and there is also evidence on voting twice. The law was broken. I believe what Mr. Beast is pointing to is the absurdity of racism in this case because no matter what, the end result is that an African American in 70% African American county would win.

Can you direct me to a resource that indicates that there was "admitted" tampering in this case? I have read a fair amount about it and have not seen that.

I hate doing this type of searching because all media outlets today are partisan. Heres a link though:



Thanks, Beast. I have no idea what is true. This is the only source that reports the admission. Everything else I read states that all three denied the charges and were promptly acquitted.

In any event, I am not at all a fan of Jeff Sessions. That said, he is the U.S. Attorney General. From listening to him today, he seems motivated to prosecute at Trump's pleasure. I don't see him ever redirecting [strike]Bannon's[/strike] Trump's wishes.


There is another interview with one of the defendant's sons on AL.com, where he strongly asserts that he does not believe there was any element of racism on Session's part. The way the left has attacked every one of Trump's appointments, you can be certain that if it wasn't racism, it would be another smear tactic. The next four years of media reports will be unwatchable, and likely will only galvanize Trump's base. If Trump actually achieves some of his objectives, the left had better get used to 8 years of Trump, as most Americans vote with their wallets.
I agree w you that the left is going too far. From the celebrity speeches, to the media, to the Democrats opposing everything Trump does. IMO this extreme ideology does not sit well w the middle, and helps the Republican Party.
 
We live in a dangerous world. The left is doing all it can to take the most important duty away from the President that is to protect the citizens of the U.S. The President is the Commander in Chief and has information that no judges have. That is why Roosevelt did what he had to do with the Japanese American during the WW2 and Kennedy did during the Cuban missile crises .
If you are an American and your heritage is from one those countries that is mark as dangerous you should be American first and be against evil from entering our country. Just like the Japanese American who fought in Europe and was most decorated unit during the war. Just like the German American who fought in the Pacific . Just like the Italian American who receive more metals during WW2 than any other nationally. Just like the Black Americans who have fighting and dying in every war because their Americans first even they felt injustice.

If you are on the left please be American first.
 
We live in a dangerous world. The left is doing all it can to take the most important duty away from the President that is to protect the citizens of the U.S. The President is the Commander in Chief and has information that no judges have. That is why Roosevelt did what he had to do with the Japanese American during the WW2 and Kennedy did during the Cuban missile crises .
If you are an American and your heritage is from one those countries that is mark as dangerous you should be American first and be against evil from entering our country. Just like the Japanese American who fought in Europe and was most decorated unit during the war. Just like the German American who fought in the Pacific . Just like the Italian American who receive more metals during WW2 than any other nationally. Just like the Black Americans who have fighting and dying in every war because their Americans first even they felt injustice.

If you are on the left please be American first.

In a Rasmussen poll 52% support Trump's temporary ban on travel from those countries. That means that 9% more of the population than voted for Trump support this. Agree it could have been implemented a lot better, but liberal ranting is moving more people towards Trump on this issue.
 
We live in a dangerous world. The left is doing all it can to take the most important duty away from the President that is to protect the citizens of the U.S. The President is the Commander in Chief and has information that no judges have. That is why Roosevelt did what he had to do with the Japanese American during the WW2 and Kennedy did during the Cuban missile crises .
If you are an American and your heritage is from one those countries that is mark as dangerous you should be American first and be against evil from entering our country. Just like the Japanese American who fought in Europe and was most decorated unit during the war. Just like the German American who fought in the Pacific . Just like the Italian American who receive more metals during WW2 than any other nationally. Just like the Black Americans who have fighting and dying in every war because their Americans first even they felt injustice.

If you are on the left please be American first.

In a Rasmussen poll 52% support Trump's temporary ban on travel from those countries. That means that 9% more of the population than voted for Trump support this. Agree it could have been implemented a lot better, but liberal ranting is moving more people towards Trump on this issue.

Beast not only was there a problem in the implementation, but there was also a problem in the presentation. How something is packaged is sometimes even more important than the content. If could have and should have been handled better. At the very least, it would have given the left a little bit less to whine about. Although I'm sure they would have just gone and found something else.
 
Wow.....this message board seems to consist of a disproportionate number of conservative minded members. Am I the only blue?

Look, both sides are corrupt in their power hungry pursuits. I believe we can agree there since the title of this thread (created prior to the election) is the lesser of two evils. Perhaps it's because I am not extreme left, that I can see the short comings and falsehood of democrats. I am mostly motivated by total disdain for Trump and his morally bankrupt entourage (admittedly just my opinion).

Hopefully those who are accepting or supportive of this new administration can recognize bad policy, fascism and corruption when and if it takes place. Sometimes, when we are all busy defending "our side" and shaming the other, we fail to hold our own side accountable. Frankly, I am concerned about that.
 
Left is running on empty. Right is mixing bleach and ammonia. Just had lunch with a friend who said that all of his attorney clients said that a grownup would have fixed the language in the executive order and made the whole deal moot. Cynical creep in me continues to think that follow the money is the best current practice for the citizenry. On another note. Maybe STJ could open the Kelly Ann Conway School of Marketing using Presidential Case Studies; i.e.

My name is Abe Lincoln and I buy my stovetop hats from Stetson.

Yes it's true, the rocking chair that helps me, your President, hide my Addison's disease is from Sears.

This Eisenhower jacket was tailored by Hart, Schaffner, and Marx.
 
Wow.....this message board seems to consist of a disproportionate number of conservative minded members. Am I the only blue?

Look, both sides are corrupt in their power hungry pursuits. I believe we can agree there since the title of this thread (created prior to the election) is the lesser of two evils. Perhaps it's because I am not extreme left, that I can see the short comings and falsehood of democrats. I am mostly motivated by total disdain for Trump and his morally bankrupt entourage (admittedly just my opinion).

Hopefully those who are accepting or supportive of this new administration can recognize bad policy, fascism and corruption when and if it takes place. Sometimes, when we are all busy defending "our side" and shaming the other, we fail to hold our own side accountable. Frankly, I am concerned about that.
Nah there are a lot of democrats on the board. They just aren't posting that much on this thread. I'd say a lot of them are like you. I wouldn't call them extreme at all. Most are pretty reasonable. I'd say probably maybe little left of center but definitely not way far to the left
 
We live in a dangerous world. The left is doing all it can to take the most important duty away from the President that is to protect the citizens of the U.S. The President is the Commander in Chief and has information that no judges have. That is why Roosevelt did what he had to do with the Japanese American during the WW2 and Kennedy did during the Cuban missile crises .
If you are an American and your heritage is from one those countries that is mark as dangerous you should be American first and be against evil from entering our country. Just like the Japanese American who fought in Europe and was most decorated unit during the war. Just like the German American who fought in the Pacific . Just like the Italian American who receive more metals during WW2 than any other nationally. Just like the Black Americans who have fighting and dying in every war because their Americans first even they felt injustice.

If you are on the left please be American first.

In a Rasmussen poll 52% support Trump's temporary ban on travel from those countries. That means that 9% more of the population than voted for Trump support this. Agree it could have been implemented a lot better, but liberal ranting is moving more people towards Trump on this issue.

Beast not only was there a problem in the implementation, but there was also a problem in the presentation. How something is packaged is sometimes even more important than the content. If could have and should have been handled better. At the very least, it would have given the left a little bit less to whine about. Although I'm sure they would have just gone and found something else.

Agreed, Monte. Packaging is important. One of the things people championed about Trump's campaign is that it was NOT "politically correct". While that is refreshing to some, it's offensive for others. Now, since approximately half the country does not trust that Trump has one human interest bone in his body, packing becomes even more important. Perhaps he'll learn.
 
Left is running on empty. Right is mixing bleach and ammonia. Just had lunch with a friend who said that all of his attorney clients said that a grownup would have fixed the language in the executive order and made the whole deal moot.
.
Funny you mention that. I was speaking to a client today who is a big attorney ( republican ) and he said the same exact thing. I thought what he said was pretty interesting especially coming from a republican and seem like you heard the same exact thing.

He was saying something like Trump should scrap this one and issue a new one that could be pretty much bullet proof or something like that but by that point my mind was going numb from listening to too much legal talk so I'm not 100% on the details of what he was saying at the end
 
JF, the problem with being mentored by Roy Cohn is that your role model was someone who when they were not in some kind of dispute lived in the memory of growing up in an anti-Semitic, homophobic world, only to discover that they are a gay Jew. (My dissertation included research on when people learn stigmatizing attitudes and it typically predates awareness of being in the stigmatized group). For anyone to stay in Roy Cohn mode when they have succeeded is usually counter-productive, seen as bullying or lack of grace.
 
Wow.....this message board seems to consist of a disproportionate number of conservative minded members. Am I the only blue?

Look, both sides are corrupt in their power hungry pursuits. I believe we can agree there since the title of this thread (created prior to the election) is the lesser of two evils. Perhaps it's because I am not extreme left, that I can see the short comings and falsehood of democrats. I am mostly motivated by total disdain for Trump and his morally bankrupt entourage (admittedly just my opinion).

Hopefully those who are accepting or supportive of this new administration can recognize bad policy, fascism and corruption when and if it takes place. Sometimes, when we are all busy defending "our side" and shaming the other, we fail to hold our own side accountable. Frankly, I am concerned about that.

JF you may well be right about Trump and his entourage being morally bankrupt. I don't know the man or his entourage personally so I can't argue the point. Although I do know a number of people(male, female, black, white, Hispanic, etc) who do know him and who claim differently. I would tend to side with you though. Having said that, IMO there are few high level politicians who have not sold their soles to get were they are(or have been), and that includes the Clintons. So since I don't know either Clinton or Trump personally, and since I assume they are both morally bankrupt, and since I am a republican, voting for Trump was not all that difficult for me. And now I am going to put my full support behind him, not that I agree with everything he does. I would have done the same for Hillary and I did the same for Obama, even though I didn't vote for him and never thought held him in high regard as a president.
 
Wow.....this message board seems to consist of a disproportionate number of conservative minded members. Am I the only blue?

Look, both sides are corrupt in their power hungry pursuits. I believe we can agree there since the title of this thread (created prior to the election) is the lesser of two evils. Perhaps it's because I am not extreme left, that I can see the short comings and falsehood of democrats. I am mostly motivated by total disdain for Trump and his morally bankrupt entourage (admittedly just my opinion).

Hopefully those who are accepting or supportive of this new administration can recognize bad policy, fascism and corruption when and if it takes place. Sometimes, when we are all busy defending "our side" and shaming the other, we fail to hold our own side accountable. Frankly, I am concerned about that.
Nah there are a lot of democrats on the board. They just aren't posting that much on this thread. I'd say a lot of them are like you. I wouldn't call them extreme at all. Most are pretty reasonable. I'd say probably maybe little left of center but definitely not way far to the left

JF and MJ, you both sound quite rational and open-minded in your views, and the main difference I see from the banter on social media is that you both have the skill for self-examination. My question is why is the democratic party (or liberal/left ideology) not having an indepth self-examination on how their party and their world got turned upside down? Instead the focus is self-denial and attacks. To me, a revitalized democratic not to mention mainstream republican party is vital for a better, healthier American democracy. Not sure you would agree with Glenn Greenwald (he has won the Pulitzer Prize) views and from what i can see is more objective, evidence-based journalism. But here it is in case of interest:

 
JF - I am still astounded that our last 2 Presidents were neophytes in government, and while I did not vote for Obama, would not have voted for Trump if there was a reasonable choice to be made. The PResidency is not an entry level job. My only hope is, that at least compared to Obama, Trump had built a billion dollar corporation, hired and managed people, completed gigantic projects on time and within budget. To me, that counts for something.

I do feel though, as to your concerns about Trump is that his ego is so large, he would like nothing better than to be remembered as the President who brought jobs back to the US, revived our inner cities with job opportunities, re-asserted our presence as the global economic and military superpower, reduced the threat of acts of racial terrorism - far above than your fears of him acting unethically in office. If a Trump Presidency is successful, I believe you will see strong movement of re-organization within the Democratic Party to bring it closer tot he center and rid it of the far left political ideology that Americans are rejecting.
 
JF - I am still astounded that our last 2 Presidents were neophytes in government, and while I did not vote for Obama, would not have voted for Trump if there was a reasonable choice to be made. The PResidency is not an entry level job. My only hope is, that at least compared to Obama, Trump had built a billion dollar corporation, hired and managed people, completed gigantic projects on time and within budget. To me, that counts for something.

I do feel though, as to your concerns about Trump is that his ego is so large, he would like nothing better than to be remembered as the President who brought jobs back to the US, revived our inner cities with job opportunities, re-asserted our presence as the global economic and military superpower, reduced the threat of acts of racial terrorism - far above than your fears of him acting unethically in office. If a Trump Presidency is successful, I believe you will see strong movement of re-organization within the Democratic Party to bring it closer tot he center and rid it of the far left political ideology that Americans are rejecting.

Agree completely. Frankly I could care less whether Trump wants to be a successful president for altruistic reasons or for egotistical reasons. Nor do I really care whether I like the guy or not. I only care that he is successful. That's all anyone should care about. But too many people on the far left would much rather that he fail so that can say "I told you so!".
 
Commentary from a center right friend:

You voted for Trump because Clinton was going to be in Wall Street's pocket. Trump wants to repeal Dodd-Frank and eliminate the Fiduciary Rule, letting Wall Street return to its pre-2008 ways.
You voted for Trump because of Clinton's emails. The Trump administration is running its own private email server.
You voted for Trump because you thought the Clinton Foundation was "pay for play." Trump has refused to wall off his businesses from his administration, and personally profits from payments from foreign governments.
You voted for Trump because of Clinton's role in Benghazi. Trump ordered the Yemen raid without adequate intel, and tweeted about "FAKE NEWS" while Americans died as a result of his carelessness.
You voted for Trump because Clinton didn't care about "the little guy." Trump's cabinet is full of billionaires, and he took away your health insurance so he could give them a multi-million-dollar tax break.
You voted for Trump because he was going to build a wall and Mexico was going to pay for it. American consumers will pay for the wall via import tariffs.
You voted for Trump because Clinton was going to get us into a war. Trump has provoked our enemies, alienated our allies, and given ISIS a decade's worth of recruiting material.
You voted for Trump because Clinton didn't have the stamina to do the job. Trump hung up on the Australian Prime Minister during a 5pm phone call because "it was at the end of a long day and he was tired and fatigue was setting in."
You voted for Trump because foreign leaders wouldn't "respect" Clinton. Foreign leaders, both friendly and hostile, are openly mocking Trump.
You voted for Trump because Clinton lies and "he tells it like it is." Trump and his administration lie with a regularity and brazenness that can only be described as shocking.
Let's be honest about what really happened.
The reality is that you voted for Trump because you got conned. Trump is a grifter and the American people were the mark.
Good luck. We'll all need it.
 
JF you may well be right about Trump and his entourage being morally bankrupt. I don't know the man or his entourage personally so I can't argue the point. Although I do know a number of people(male, female, black, white, Hispanic, etc) who do know him and who claim differently. I would tend to side with you though. Having said that, IMO there are few high level politicians who have not sold their soles to get were they are(or have been), and that includes the Clintons. So since I don't know either Clinton or Trump personally, and since I assume they are both morally bankrupt, and since I am a republican, voting for Trump was not all that difficult for me. And now I am going to put my full support behind him, not that I agree with everything he does. I would have done the same for Hillary and I did the same for Obama, even though I didn't vote for him and never thought held him in high regard as a president.

The problem with treating the left reasonably is that the left's default position is incivility. To democrats republicans are either dumb - like Dan Quayle and Ronald Reagan - or evil - like Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld - or in special cases both dumb and evil, like Nixon and Bush the younger. And meanwhile Al Gore, who flunked out of half a dozen colleges, he's a genius, and LBJ, a died in the wool racist, he's a champion of civil rights. Trump is a bigot because all 17 members of the KKK voted for him and Robert Byrd, who was actually in the KKK when it mattered and who dropped an N bomb on national television, him we name airports after. Woodrow Wilson, who re segregated the government after reconstruction and campaigned for miscegenation laws, he's a great guy, not like that awful Steve Bannon, who edited a website that 17 racists posted on. Joe McCarthy, who claimed rightfully that their were officials in the US government making common cause with hall of fame mass murderer Stalin, he's the antichrist, and Alger Hiss, who was actually making cause with Stalin, every ten years some dope writes another NY Times bestseller proving he got a raw deal. Forget how irrational that all is. How is that civil? Explain how that is deserves comity and respect? Pro tip: you can't.

You can see it in this thread: Trump and his entourage are "morally bankrupt" and deserving of "disdain". What does that tell us? First, that the writer considers himself good and moral; and second that he finds anyone who disagrees with him the opposite: they're bad and immoral. That's not a civil position that serves as a jumping off point for calm and reasoned discussion. It's the jumping off point for William Buckley's response to Gore Vidal: "Stop calling me a crypto-Nazi, or I’ll sock you in the goddamn face.” And it's especially not deserving of comity coming from someone who voted for a member of the Clinton Crime Family, a husband and wife team of criminal masterminds who made hundreds of millions of dollars while in "government service," where government service is defined as selling the hereditaments of government both tangible - missile technology to the chinese, uranium to the russians - and intangible - influence and access - in exchange for speaking fees and political contributions and donations to the Clinton Foundation - odd how the CF closed its doors ten minutes after CNN declared Wisconsin for Trump, isn't it. And meanwhile the left worries that Trump the self made billionaire is going to make a couple of dollars booking hotel rooms in Trump Towers or that his kid's going to get rich quick selling shmatas at Nordstrum's.

The charge that Trump is a fascist is especially laughable. Trump is a game show host. He's not going build concentration camps in the desert and name Bob Eubanks head of the Gestapo and put Chuck Woolery in charge of the Luftwaffe. What he says he's going to do is cut taxes, and curtail the regulatory bureaucracy, and diminish the influence of government in the lives of its citizenry. That's the opposite of fascism. Fascism is when the president says if Congress - the duly elected representatives of the people who have consented to be governed - won't act then I will, unilaterally, because I know what's best for the people. That's the very definition of totalitarianism: a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state.

I did not vote for Donald Trump and for all the above am not much of a Trump supporter and bottom line think Trump is a vapid narcissistic chucklehead: if he were a basketball coach he'd be Steve Lavin, except more successful and with a slightly less bulbous head. But all this Kumbaya stuff is BS. Newsflash: the left hates you and everything you stand for. They hate you for who you are, and how you act, and and what you think, and what you believe. If they had their way your ways would not exist. All that the pretense of civility does is make bring their dystopia closer to reality.
 
JF you may well be right about Trump and his entourage being morally bankrupt. I don't know the man or his entourage personally so I can't argue the point. Although I do know a number of people(male, female, black, white, Hispanic, etc) who do know him and who claim differently. I would tend to side with you though. Having said that, IMO there are few high level politicians who have not sold their soles to get were they are(or have been), and that includes the Clintons. So since I don't know either Clinton or Trump personally, and since I assume they are both morally bankrupt, and since I am a republican, voting for Trump was not all that difficult for me. And now I am going to put my full support behind him, not that I agree with everything he does. I would have done the same for Hillary and I did the same for Obama, even though I didn't vote for him and never thought held him in high regard as a president.

The problem with treating the left reasonably is that the left's default position is incivility. To democrats republicans are either dumb - like Dan Quayle and Ronald Reagan - or evil - like Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld - or in special cases both dumb and evil, like Nixon and Bush the younger. And meanwhile Al Gore, who flunked out of half a dozen colleges, he's a genius, and LBJ, a died in the wool racist, he's a champion of civil rights. Trump is a bigot because all 17 members of the KKK voted for him and Robert Byrd, who was actually in the KKK when it mattered and who dropped an N bomb on national television, him we name airports after. Woodrow Wilson, who re segregated the government after reconstruction and campaigned for miscegenation laws, he's a great guy, not like that awful Steve Bannon, who edited a website that 17 racists posted on. Joe McCarthy, who claimed rightfully that their were officials in the US government making common cause with hall of fame mass murderer Stalin, he's the antichrist, and Alger Hiss, who was actually making cause with Stalin, every ten years some dope writes another NY Times bestseller proving he got a raw deal. Forget how irrational that all is. How is that civil? Explain how that is deserves comity and respect? Pro tip: you can't.

You can see it in this thread: Trump and his entourage are "morally bankrupt" and deserving of "disdain". What does that tell us? First, that the writer considers himself good and moral; and second that he finds anyone who disagrees with him the opposite: they're bad and immoral. That's not a civil position that serves as a jumping off point for calm and reasoned discussion. It's the jumping off point for William Buckley's response to Gore Vidal: "Stop calling me a crypto-Nazi, or I’ll sock you in the goddamn face.” And it's especially not deserving of comity coming from someone who voted for a member of the Clinton Crime Family, a husband and wife team of criminal masterminds who made hundreds of millions of dollars while in "government service," where government service is defined as selling the hereditaments of government both tangible - missile technology to the chinese, uranium to the russians - and intangible - influence and access - in exchange for speaking fees and political contributions and donations to the Clinton Foundation - odd how the CF closed its doors ten minutes after CNN declared Wisconsin for Trump, isn't it. And meanwhile the left worries that Trump the self made billionaire is going to make a couple of dollars booking hotel rooms in Trump Towers or that his kid's going to get rich quick selling shmatas at Nordstrum's.

The charge that Trump is a fascist is especially laughable. Trump is a game show host. He's not going build concentration camps in the desert and name Bob Eubanks head of the Gestapo and put Chuck Woolery in charge of the Luftwaffe. What he says he's going to do is cut taxes, and curtail the regulatory bureaucracy, and diminish the influence of government in the lives of its citizenry. That's the opposite of fascism. Fascism is when the president says if Congress - the duly elected representatives of the people who have consented to be governed - won't act then I will, unilaterally, because I know what's best for the people. That's the very definition of totalitarianism: a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state.

I did not vote for Donald Trump and for all the above am not much of a Trump supporter and bottom line think Trump is a vapid narcissistic chucklehead: if he were a basketball coach he'd be Steve Lavin, except more successful and with a slightly less bulbous head. But all this Kumbaya stuff is BS. Newsflash: the left hates you and everything you stand for. They hate you for who you are, and how you act, and and what you think, and what you believe. If they had their way your ways would not exist. All that the pretense of civility does is make bring their dystopia closer to reality.

You may not think Trump is a fascist, but watch out when the Capital is burning and he declares martial law.
 
You may not think Trump is a fascist, but watch out when the Capital is burning and he declares martial law.

What would you have him do when the Capital starts burning? Fiddle?
 
You may not think Trump is a fascist, but watch out when the Capital is burning and he declares martial law.

What would you have him do when the Capital starts burning? Fiddle?

I never would have believed you, of all people, would have missed the parallell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top