Paultzman post=464001 said:https://twitter.com/nybuckets/status/1503179491505590273?s=21
Looks like all three had a higher NET ranking, so maybe not such a surprised.
Paultzman post=464001 said:https://twitter.com/nybuckets/status/1503179491505590273?s=21
otis post=463973 said:If someone told me on October 31, 2021 that our beloved St John’s RedStorm would not make either the NCAA Tournament or the NIT I would not believed them.
I would have said either catastrophic injuries, catastrophic scandal or covid. I suppose Miss. Valley State going 2-26 did not help the metrics, but hey what do I know. We did beat them by 77 or whatever though!
SJU85 post=464037 said:Not surprised nor disappointed (I saved that for the way the season played out and not being at least a bubble NCAA team). I didn’t even bother to check to see if we got in until this morning. Just means the offseason of discontent starts early.
I am disappointed (in the season and not making either tourney). I thought that the NIT could be good experience for our guys, assuming that we keep most (which is all you can assume right now). No downside. But I am with you and fear that the offseason may be another debacle.
I don't think they deserved anything, I know they did not earn postseason. Just sad.espken post=464013 said:Man, even Norm led us to the NIT once./media/kunena/emoticons/w00t.png
Honestly our NET of 69 was overshadowed by our single Quad 1 win. Our crunch time collapses really proved to be lethal. A shame because this team deserved some kind of post season acknowledgment.
Paultzman post=464062 said:NIT is not the local flavored event it once was and is merit based and formula driven. SJU just did not do enough to deserve a bid. Lessons learned are schedule better, close out games and dispense with our tradition of digging big holes in the won/loss column
Paultzman post=464062 said:NIT is not the local flavored event it once was and is merit based and formula driven. SJU just did not do enough to deserve a bid. Lessons learned are schedule better, close out games and dispense with our tradition of digging big holes in the win/loss column
I don't think the Tulsa rumors played a role. Aside from SJU's resume just not being good enough for the NIT, I think it's quite likely that this Tulsa thing has been in play for a couple weeks now if it truly does have legs. It's been pretty clear for a few months that Haith was likely going to be let go there and Anderson had to know that. Wouldn't be surprised if some backchanneling was done on both Anderson's and Tulsa's ends weeks ago to gauge this other's interest. I don't think this just popped up out of nowhere this weekend, that's just when it became publicly speculated about.fordham96 post=464102 said:It does seem strange that SJU puts in a bid to host NIT (I am sure they were pretty confident they were getting in) and then the Mike Anderson/Tulsa rumors come out and they don't make the NIT.
Makes you think.
the NIT does itself a disservice by giving automatic bids to the conference champions of these awful conferences. Some might deserve it, but not all these conferences. It left out some deserving teams who would/could put on a good game.austour post=463972 said:11 Automatic bids, not 12 as I previously stated.Section3 post=463951 said:They are 3 of 9 automatic bids. So, at least 23 teams selected based on whatever criteria is used.mm52 post=463943 said:Towson, Nicholls, princeton, make it over st john's?
Atlantic Sun: Jacksonville State - Because Bellarmine was ineligible to play in dance jacksonville state got NCAA bid
Big West: Long Beach State
CAA: Towson
Conference USA: North Texas - Only automatic bid to be seeded so they were in regardless
Ivy: Princeton
Missouri Valley: Northern Iowa
Sun Belt: Texas State
Horizon League: Cleveland State
MAAC: Iona
MAC: Toledo
Southland: Nicholls
SWAC: Alcorn State
mm52 post=464113 said:the NIT does itself a disservice by giving automatic bids to the conference champions of these awful conferences. Some might deserve it, but not all these conferences. It left out some deserving teams who would/could put on a good game.
The same could be said about the NCAA Tournament. The NIT is all about which teams actually care and what to be there. Lots of times those teams from small conferences want to be there way more than the big conference teams that had NCAA Tournament at large aspirations. See, Robert Morris vs St. John's.mm52 post=464113 said:the NIT does itself a disservice by giving automatic bids to the conference champions of these awful conferences. Some might deserve it, but not all these conferences. It left out some deserving teams who would/could put on a good game.austour post=463972 said:11 Automatic bids, not 12 as I previously stated.Section3 post=463951 said:They are 3 of 9 automatic bids. So, at least 23 teams selected based on whatever criteria is used.mm52 post=463943 said:Towson, Nicholls, princeton, make it over st john's?
Atlantic Sun: Jacksonville State - Because Bellarmine was ineligible to play in dance jacksonville state got NCAA bid
Big West: Long Beach State
CAA: Towson
Conference USA: North Texas - Only automatic bid to be seeded so they were in regardless
Ivy: Princeton
Missouri Valley: Northern Iowa
Sun Belt: Texas State
Horizon League: Cleveland State
MAAC: Iona
MAC: Toledo
Southland: Nicholls
SWAC: Alcorn State