beast of the east
Active member
http://nypost.com/2014/03/26/manhattan-should-punish-masiello-harshly-but-let-him-keep-coaching/
If he didn't graduate, maybe he has playing eligibility left.
http://nypost.com/2014/03/26/manhattan-should-punish-masiello-harshly-but-let-him-keep-coaching/
I know a guy who doesn't have his diploma but graduated. Doesn't have the diploma because he owes money on a parking ticket on campus and refuses to pay (he disputes the ticket and its a principle thing he says). But he knows he graduated.
I agree with the sentiment on how do you not know whether you graduated or not?
I know a guy who doesn't have his diploma but graduated. Doesn't have the diploma because he owes money on a parking ticket on campus and refuses to pay (he disputes the ticket and its a principle thing he says). But he knows he graduated.
I agree with the sentiment on how do you not know whether you graduated or not?
To me, the way Masiello is handling it is as bad as not having it in the first place, maybe worse.
Here's a believable and acceptable response: (I don't know if it's historically accurate, but this is what the public would accept):
I finished my senior year just a couple of credits short of a degree and always intended on going back to finish it up, but then I had opportunities to get involved in coaching, and while it's always been out there, I just didn't get around to setting aside the time to spend a summer in Lexington. To be an assistant it wasn't required, and I wrongly had it on my reseume because I am very very close and did intend to finish. No matter the outcome of this, I am aware of the gravity of the situation, and fully intend to finish at Kentucky this summer. I apologize for the embarrassment this has caused anyone, especially Manhattan College, any employers contemplating me for employment, and to my family.
Francesa has talked about the Masiello sitation a fair bit over last coupe of days.
Wonder if Mike would consider it "lying" if someone promised to establish a scholarship and then decided not to fund it.
The thing vaguely resemble the Pete Rose gambling scandal in baseball. Of course there is striking differences, so let's not get bogged down in that.
What Rose did was inexcusable and broke some cardinal rules in baseball, but had nothing to do with his performance as a player. He claims it never affected his decisions as a manager, and never bet against his team, but that's really a side issue in that his performance as a player was not affected by gambling as far as we know.
Masiello's lack of a degree has nothing to do with his success as a coach. But, as a prerequisite, he falsified his academic record, and as such, as a very public figure, it discredits himself and his employer. With one foot out the door in Manhattan anyway, they'd be advised to say adios.
In academia, academic credentials take on almost inappropriate proportions. I've always said that the only long term position I'd have aspired to had I stayed at St. John's was dean at a minimum, but in order to do so, I'd have to obtain a PhD. This would be regardless of any leadership or managerial abilities displayed. Without any desire to stay long term, nor any desire to pursue a PhD solely for that purpose, I left very early on.
In Masiello's case, had his little lie happened in a public sector job where he had already proven his ability to do the job, he'd almost certainly be disciplined to mildly reprimanded, but likely kept his job. Unless of course, he was in a position where licensure and degree was mandatory - say a surgeon.
The thing vaguely resemble the Pete Rose gambling scandal in baseball. Of course there is striking differences, so let's not get bogged down in that.
What Rose did was inexcusable and broke some cardinal rules in baseball, but had nothing to do with his performance as a player. He claims it never affected his decisions as a manager, and never bet against his team, but that's really a side issue in that his performance as a player was not affected by gambling as far as we know.
Masiello's lack of a degree has nothing to do with his success as a coach. But, as a prerequisite, he falsified his academic record, and as such, as a very public figure, it discredits himself and his employer. With one foot out the door in Manhattan anyway, they'd be advised to say adios.
In academia, academic credentials take on almost inappropriate proportions. I've always said that the only long term position I'd have aspired to had I stayed at St. John's was dean at a minimum, but in order to do so, I'd have to obtain a PhD. This would be regardless of any leadership or managerial abilities displayed. Without any desire to stay long term, nor any desire to pursue a PhD solely for that purpose, I left very early on.
In Masiello's case, had his little lie happened in a public sector job where he had already proven his ability to do the job, he'd almost certainly be disciplined to mildly reprimanded, but likely kept his job. Unless of course, he was in a position where licensure and degree was mandatory - say a surgeon.
Pete Rose? Shocked you did not reference Ty Cobb. Sheez!