Kadary

I really don't see a problem with Kadary snd Deivon existing in the same backcourt. In fact I think they can compliment each other while being different types of athletes.

In transition, Smith and Luis become potent weapons, and the way Zuby runs the floor can be a finisher or mop up guy. Kadary least effective starter on the break.

In the half court, Kadary is one of the best guards in the league. His offensive ability, passing and decision making 16 feet and in are unmatched. With Scott's range and Luis and Zuby able to take it to the rack, Smith is the least effective starter.

Smith plsys a high speed, high wire game. When we can run, he becomes more valuable. When the going gets rough however, teams that can be effe tive in halfcourt often prevail. That's Kadary.

Both are great rebounders, both pass well, both can swipe, ands both block shots. Nod to Kadary who can hold his own again big men.

Controversy? Not by a long shot. Kadary, who can shoulder more of an offensive load when needed, is happy to fill a boxscore without scoring 18-20 points.

Lobster and filet mignon really don't belong together, do they? One lives on land the other a bottom.feeder. but as different as they are, damn they are good together.
This is exactly correct.

Plus, Kadary and Deivon only need to play about 20 minutes together a game.
 
Well I am, we just disagree. Effort has nothing to do with patience.
Good point. Poor effort is no way to endear oneself to a fanbase.

Still even if you combine Matt Brust type effort with NBA level skill there will always be a blind outlier or two that just irrationally has it in for you. I.e. last year and our beloved Mr. Jenkins.
 
Back
Top