I was always a big fan of the soccer teams, we were good and competitive. Mens soccer rosters will triple and the women will double. To what end? It's as if they randomly chose numbers to increase all the sports rosters. Lacrosse 12 to 48. Seriously?
This is not going to be a real increase (in some cases it is an actual decrease) in the amount of players a team can roster in a sport, just an increase in the amount of scholarships they can give. Most teams were carrying this or close to this amount anyway. Examples:
Men’s Basketball
Currently allow 15 players to dress for a game while 13 (14 in Women’s) are allowed to be on scholarship. Under the new proposal, 15 is the new scholarship max allowed which matches the amount on the roster. No net increase/decrease in roster size.
Football
While 85 scholarships are allowed, 120 players are allowed to be rostered. Under the proposed change, 105 will be allowed to have scholarships and that is the maximum amount that can be rostered. This is an increase of 20 scholarships but a decrease of 15 roster spots.
Baseball
Unlike football and basketball, this and other sports are allowed to split scholarships. Quite frankly, they have to because they don’t provide enough full scholarships to field in some cases a full team that is allowed to be on the field/pitch/court/rink let alone the number of reserves needed.
Baseball currently allows a roster of 40 (it was 35 prior to the pandemic, I believe it was scheduled to go back to 35 this season) but only 11.7 scholarships which could be split among 27 players. The proposed rule changes now 34 roster all of which can be full scholarships. An increase in scholarships but decrease in roster size. This past season, St. John’s carried 40 players on their roster.
Men’s Soccer
Currently the roster size here is between 30 - 35 but only 9.9 full scholarships which is less than the 11 allowed on the field at anytime. Scholarships of course here are split. New proposed rule is 28 scholarships and roster, an increase in scholarships but decrease in roster size.
Women’s Soccer
Currently the roster size here is between 30 - 35 and 14 full scholarships which is three more than the 11 allowed on the field at anytime. Scholarships of course here are split. New proposed rule is 28 scholarships and roster, an increase in scholarships but decrease in roster size.
Men’s Lacrosse
While I am not sure how many players are allowed currently on a roster, 12 is the current amount of scholarships allowed. St. John’s currently has 52 players listed on their roster for the upcoming season. New proposed rule caps their roster and scholarship size to 48, a decrease in four in roster size.
Now while some of the players on rosters that did not receive any form of athletic scholarship were recruited. They and others who received partial athletic scholarships received assistance for tuition/room/board in the form of academic scholarships, various grants etc. (football teams used NIL instead of scholarships for recruited long snappers, punters and place kickers so they can use their athletic scholarship allotments elsewhere). These will no longer be needed for this purpose.
While NIL for other sports are considerably less for non-football and basketball teams, it is still use to help fund players not on full scholarship in places like the SEC, ACC and Big 12 where Baseball and Softball are actually revenue generators and draw a lot of fans, support and benefactors.
It will be interesting to see how many schools fund all of these scholarships on a consistent basis as it will be a big increase in the athletic budgets.