IF he signs a monster recruiting class then yes resign him for a couple years. I don't see that happening if we perform poorly on the court.
IMO if he signs a monster class they let him coach next year and see what he does. If he does nothing, then they don't renew him. I so badly want Sampson, Daughty and hopefully Diallo and some other kids here for next year, that I'm willing to suffer through the pain of watching Lavin coach for one more year.
Monte, what's the odds of him getting a studded freshmen class into the ncaa?
If co and rj doesn't return, then he'll be relying on freshmen to save his job (and it's not uk where they get 4 or 5 top 10 kids.), so he might say: "Yeah I'm recruiting a real good class, and my future is going to rely on those inexperienced kids."
What if he tells those recruits that he isn't getting an extension, so he won't be returning to coach his final year. So he could force an extension. Would the new AD then give it to him or hold out?
With a new coach, we"ll have to wait atleast 3 years. Giving Lavin a 2 year extension, we might be real good by March of next year. Which is the only reason I say give him two more year.
I really don't want to wait atleast 3 more years.
Even make Lavin rehire Dunhap, if he's willing to return.
Lavin has a contract. and he should honor that contract. He should tell every recruit that he will definitely be here next year and that he plans on being here beyond next year. If he tries to force an extension by threatening to sabotage his own recruiting class, then he'd really be shooting himself in the foot on many different levels. I'd like to think he wouldn't do that, if for no other reason than for his own sake.
I hope you're right, but he might say: "why let my future be based on what freshmen do.
Here's the deal monte:
Give him a 2 year extension, which is 3 altogether. Give him two years instead of what you're saying which is one year. That would give him two years with his recruits, aren't college kids better in their second year then their first year anyway?
Then forget how good he recruits after the 15 class, bottom line is you better win or you go, it's that simple.
I hear what you're saying oldschool, I just think that 6 years is more than enough time to prove whether or not you've got the program headed in the right direction. If we finish this year strong, and if he brings in a strong class for next year, and if we start next year strong, then maybe the school starts a dialogue with him about a 2 year(not more) extension. Even if he leaves at the end of his contract(next year), at least the cupboard won't be completely bare for the new coach. Just my opinion.
I think that's a reasonable strategy Monte, but what do you do if he half-achieves?
If we don't make the tournament, but he signs an OK, but not great class, (say, sampson, Doughty freeman and lovett) what do you do then?
I think that would be better than an ok class Give him until the end of his contract and evaluate. Aside from his neg he has been a good representative of the school