(GAME TIME) (H of F) Columbia, Wed. Nov. 20, 7p, FS-1, 970 WNYM

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote="usguard" post=364053]Don’t look at the score mo we are playing badly[/quote]

No we aren’t

You can’t sit on a game thread and when a mistake happens paint a broad brush stroke

Newsflash nobody plays a perfect game.

I thought you were better than this. I guess not
 
[quote="MCNPA" post=364054][quote="Tom H O'Toole" post=364049][quote="MCNPA" post=364048]Lots of people, pundits too, weren’t sold on Champagnie at this level. He’s been fantastic for a freshman. Love this kid...0[/quote]

Time for the kid to come back in and let him go for 20[/quote]

I like Sears but he has to lose some minutes. He’s a very good rebounder but turns it over at too big a clip that it’s a liability.[/quote]

His minutes are gone once Steere is back
 
[quote="Moose" post=364052][quote="Porgyman" post=364051]Did anyone catch the stat given by the announcer in the first half? At that point, St. John’s had 13 offensive rebounds for the year. That was 2 more offensive rebounds than they had all last year.
I found that both amazing and pathetic![/quote]

It was Earlington. Not the team[/quote]
So Earlington has 13 offensive rebounds this season? And the team had 11 last year? Was it to this point last year? Quite possible I screwed up here. Too much cold medication!
 
[quote="Porgyman" post=364060][quote="Moose" post=364052][quote="Porgyman" post=364051]Did anyone catch the stat given by the announcer in the first half? At that point, St. John’s had 13 offensive rebounds for the year. That was 2 more offensive rebounds than they had all last year.
I found that both amazing and pathetic![/quote]

It was Earlington. Not the team[/quote]
So Earlington has 13 offensive rebounds this season? And the team had 11 last year? Was it to this point last year? Quite possible I screwed up here. Too much cold medication![/quote]

Earlington has more than he had all of last year.
 
[quote="usguard" post=364059]Ok I’m sorry we are playing real good[/quote]

Good talk!
 
[quote="Moose" post=364058][quote="MCNPA" post=364054][quote="Tom H O'Toole" post=364049][quote="MCNPA" post=364048]Lots of people, pundits too, weren’t sold on Champagnie at this level. He’s been fantastic for a freshman. Love this kid...0[/quote]

Time for the kid to come back in and let him go for 20[/quote]

I like Sears but he has to lose some minutes. He’s a very good rebounder but turns it over at too big a clip that it’s a liability.[/quote]

His minutes are gone once Steere is back[/quote]

True. And I really like him. He plays very hard. He’s a pure rebounder. Not much else but that’s the definition of role player. I’m fine with that. Looking forward to Steere though.
 
[quote="MCNPA" post=364063][quote="Moose" post=364058][quote="MCNPA" post=364054][quote="Tom H O'Toole" post=364049][quote="MCNPA" post=364048]Lots of people, pundits too, weren’t sold on Champagnie at this level. He’s been fantastic for a freshman. Love this kid...0[/quote]

Time for the kid to come back in and let him go for 20[/quote]

I like Sears but he has to lose some minutes. He’s a very good rebounder but turns it over at too big a clip that it’s a liability.[/quote]

His minutes are gone once Steere is back[/quote]

True. And I really like him. He plays very hard. He’s a pure rebounder. Not much else but that’s the definition of role player. I’m fine with that. Looking forward to Steere though.[/quote]

I like what he can bring too but he looks a step slow and not saying foot speed. Just seems like he’s delayed in what he does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top