(GAME TIME) (H of F) Columbia, Wed. Nov. 20, 7p, FS-1, 970 WNYM

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know it’s a blow out but don’t love those last two “shots” by LJ. Better off grabbing the ball and putting it back up.
 
CMA once again reads riot act and the team responds in a big way. One other thing that really stuck out to me about this team is how alert everyone is. One guy misses a layup and there's always 1 or 2 guys to follow or ready for put backs. How many times with Mullin teams did we see guys clueless and unforced turnovers without any offensive rebounds or second chance points?
 
[quote="sjc88" post=364037]I know it’s a blow out but don’t love those last two “shots” by LJ. Better off grabbing the ball and putting it back up.[/quote]

Rah was wide open ready to shoot a 3 also. Missed him.
 
[quote="sjc88" post=364037]I know it’s a blow out but don’t love those last two “shots” by LJ. Better off grabbing the ball and putting it back up.[/quote]

Yea but trying to keep kids focused when the game is a blowout is maybe the hardest job of all.
 
That basket had to feel great for Williams. Let him and Sears get some minutes & confidence tonight.
 
[quote="NCJohnnie" post=364043]That basket had to feel great for Williams. Let him and Sears get some minutes & confidence tonight.[/quote]

Exactly why CMA is rotating guys.
 
[quote="Moose" post=364044][quote="NCJohnnie" post=364043]That basket had to feel great for Williams. Let him and Sears get some minutes & confidence tonight.[/quote]

Exactly why CMA is rotating guys.[/quote]

I like it. Nice to see production from the bench. I can’t remember the last time we had a bench.
 
I was congratulating Williams in my head for recognizing the shot clock then he hit it. Nice Almost as nice as Patrick's half time shot... ;)
 
Is it just me or would this CMA team beat Mullin teams 9/10 times? Rebounding, playing hard defense, high basketball IQ, good timeouts, team with chemistry, responding to timeouts, keeping foot on gas, etc. Unreal what a solid staff can do. Isn't Columbia #133 or so? That's not low major...this Columbia team isn't that horrendous, we are just making them look that way. Yes we will probably lose against many of the major teams, but the signs are there that CMA and co. can succeed here. Go get top 100 studs on the reg.
 
Lots of people, pundits too, weren’t sold on Champagnie at this level. He’s been fantastic for a freshman. Love this kid...0
 
[quote="MCNPA" post=364048]Lots of people, pundits too, weren’t sold on Champagnie at this level. He’s been fantastic for a freshman. Love this kid...0[/quote]

Time for the kid to come back in and let him go for 20
 
I wouldn’t call him fantastic just at this pt a nice freshman we will see when he plays BE comp
Think the little guard on Columbia is killing us
 
Did anyone catch the stat given by the announcer in the first half? At that point, St. John’s had 13 offensive rebounds for the year. That was 2 more offensive rebounds than they had all last year.
I found that both amazing and pathetic!
 
[quote="Porgyman" post=364051]Did anyone catch the stat given by the announcer in the first half? At that point, St. John’s had 13 offensive rebounds for the year. That was 2 more offensive rebounds than they had all last year.
I found that both amazing and pathetic![/quote]

It was Earlington. Not the team
 
[quote="Tom H O'Toole" post=364049][quote="MCNPA" post=364048]Lots of people, pundits too, weren’t sold on Champagnie at this level. He’s been fantastic for a freshman. Love this kid...0[/quote]

Time for the kid to come back in and let him go for 20[/quote]

I like Sears but he has to lose some minutes. He’s a very good rebounder but turns it over at too big a clip that it’s a liability.
 
[quote="usguard" post=364053]Don’t look at the score mo we are playing badly[/quote]

We aren’t recovering well on doubles. Too lazy. Mike needs to make em run.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top