Donald Trump's Acceptance Speech

This is not the place for politics, But it is for speaking out against racism and racists. Trump is a racist. Check the videotape. And it behooves all of us and all hoops fans to denounce racism and racists. That, plus the clear data that show Trump is woefully unqualified to be POTUS. Would be a disaster for the country. (Yeah, I injected 'politics' at the end of the day. My excuse and apologia is my view that this election is the most important this country will experience since 1932.) That's it. Thanks.
1) This is the Players Lounge forum. It is the place to discuss whatever. I think this qualifies.
2) There's a lot of "not qualified" going around these days
3) Pointing out a shortcoming does not justify it. 10 points for making your point while simultaneously trying to stop others from making theirs.
4) All elections are important. Elections have consequences. How are things in the Windy City?
 
On a separate topic the last person I wanted to be seen elected ( actually the 2nd to last person as Ted Cruz I hated the most ) but the next person after him was Bernie but damn he got screwed over by the DNC with all this wikileaks stuff that's coming out now
 
On a separate topic the last person I wanted to be seen elected ( actually the 2nd to last person as Ted Cruz I hated the most ) but the next person after him was Bernie but damn he got screwed over by the DNC with all this wikileaks stuff that's coming out now

Shocked that the DNC chair and staff tried to torpedo a completely un-electable candidate.

If only the RNC had that kind of leadership......
 
How is it that someone who has Al Sharpton visit him at the White House over 50 times, Says Black Lives Matter "is a great movement", waits for days until the rioting in Ferguson has stopped before meekly saying the rioting should stop. ect. ext.ect. How is it that Obama is not considered a racist?


Many do consider Obama a racist. Just as many consider Sharpton, Trump and many others racist. But I guess it depends on one's perspective and what you consider racism.
 
Growing up in the United States we are probably all racist. The challenge is to make that aspect of our cultural heritage as benign as possible in our everyday actions. This means not only fairness and avoiding the use of "those people" mindsets but also taking care to not be the source of the kinds of micro-insults that can burden our fellow citizens. There was a piece from the Yale Infant Behavior Laboratory on 60 minutes within the last few years that seemed to demonstrate that the capacity for intolerance of the "other" is wired in to the human condition, but can be educated away with proper practice.
 
Rev wright rev al and the likes all of which Obama has paled around with, in in that aspect Obama is as racist as you believe trump is.
 
Okay. You're right. Wasn't looking for a 'free lunch'. Honest. So let 'er rip. Chicago a great town. Things are good, thanks. Hope you're well.
 
Maybe Obama is a racist (but not sure what that has to do with anything). Folks might feel that Trump's the best candidate and more power to you if that's what you think (it being a free country and all), but the man is clearly a racist.
 
Okay. You're right. Wasn't looking for a 'free lunch'. Honest. So let 'er rip. Chicago a great town. Things are good, thanks. Hope you're well.
Got anymore community organizers you can send us to swoop in at the last minute and save the day? :)
 
To assign the word racist to any caucasian person today is done today as a broad reaching indictment designed to mostly disqualify and defame. For those who are listening, the repeated use of the word begins to speak more to the accuser than the accused:

1) In recent years we've heard sweeping indictments of cops being called racist, even as officers involved in a deadly confrontation were black themselves.
2) George Zimmerman was branded a racist despite being 1/2 Latino and having African American Girlfriends.
3) A cop in Cambridge Mass was branded as a racist for asking a black Harvard professor for identification when the professor was having difficulty unlocking his front door and some sort of argument ensued when the professor took exception to the request.

At face value, Trump has said what many consider racially insensitive for his comments about wanting to keep illegal immigrants from crossing the border and adding that some of them come here to commit crimes. HE also called for a ban on Muslims entering this country until we can figure out who the terrorists are. With better use of language, many if not most Americans would agree with that sentiment.

Apparently, the Trump corporation hires many minority employees, promotes some into positions of responsbility, and pays them well. His Corporation has a disproportionate number of female executives, and reportedly pay them on an equal scale to men in similar positions.

When he claimed that the primary process was rigged to elect party favorites, he was 1000% correct, and now the wikileaks have validated that egregious and horrific plans to attack Sanders both for being a Jew in the south (where being Jewish doesn't play well) and an atheist as well.

You would think that the preumptive party nominee would run a million miles from the persons behind these plans to manipulate the results of the primaries to insure her victory. Instead, Clinton immediately hire Debbie Wasserman Schultz to reward her for her dishonesty.

I am unsure of how good a President Trump will make. I am in favor though of running government like a business - you know, simple things like spending less than you take in, and trying to grow prosperity instead of taxing more. Of course, these are novel concepts, and the uncertainty of a Trump Presidency for me is offset by the certainty that Hillary Clinton is an incompetent liar who alienates the majority of Americans, and whose meddling into foreign affairs with no resume to do so has made shambles of the middle east and given rise to ISIS, even as Iraq was becoming a stable nation.

No one is convinced in political discussions, but I have had some very good off line dialogue with those on here who can be civil even with an opposing view. For my part however, I'm done with following party lines of demonizing those with malice and without much evidence.
 
Did you read the NY Times article or just decide to write 1,500 words to share your thoughts with us? White, black, red, green or yellow, Trump's a racist.

Wish George RR Martin had you on staff. Would have had the rest of the ASOIAF books done long ago.

To assign the word racist to any caucasian person today is done today as a broad reaching indictment designed to mostly disqualify and defame. For those who are listening, the repeated use of the word begins to speak more to the accuser than the accused:

1) In recent years we've heard sweeping indictments of cops being called racist, even as officers involved in a deadly confrontation were black themselves.
2) George Zimmerman was branded a racist despite being 1/2 Latino and having African American Girlfriends.
3) A cop in Cambridge Mass was branded as a racist for asking a black Harvard professor for identification when the professor was having difficulty unlocking his front door and some sort of argument ensued when the professor took exception to the request.

At face value, Trump has said what many consider racially insensitive for his comments about wanting to keep illegal immigrants from crossing the border and adding that some of them come here to commit crimes. HE also called for a ban on Muslims entering this country until we can figure out who the terrorists are. With better use of language, many if not most Americans would agree with that sentiment.

Apparently, the Trump corporation hires many minority employees, promotes some into positions of responsbility, and pays them well. His Corporation has a disproportionate number of female executives, and reportedly pay them on an equal scale to men in similar positions.

When he claimed that the primary process was rigged to elect party favorites, he was 1000% correct, and now the wikileaks have validated that egregious and horrific plans to attack Sanders both for being a Jew in the south (where being Jewish doesn't play well) and an atheist as well.

You would think that the preumptive party nominee would run a million miles from the persons behind these plans to manipulate the results of the primaries to insure her victory. Instead, Clinton immediately hire Debbie Wasserman Schultz to reward her for her dishonesty.

I am unsure of how good a President Trump will make. I am in favor though of running government like a business - you know, simple things like spending less than you take in, and trying to grow prosperity instead of taxing more. Of course, these are novel concepts, and the uncertainty of a Trump Presidency for me is offset by the certainty that Hillary Clinton is an incompetent liar who alienates the majority of Americans, and whose meddling into foreign affairs with no resume to do so has made shambles of the middle east and given rise to ISIS, even as Iraq was becoming a stable nation.

No one is convinced in political discussions, but I have had some very good off line dialogue with those on here who can be civil even with an opposing view. For my part however, I'm done with following party lines of demonizing those with malice and without much evidence.
 
Did you read the NY Times article or just decide to write 1,500 words to share your thoughts with us? White, black, red, green or yellow, Trump's a racist.

Wish George RR Martin had you on staff. Would have had the rest of the ASOIAF books done long ago.

To assign the word racist to any caucasian person today is done today as a broad reaching indictment designed to mostly disqualify and defame. For those who are listening, the repeated use of the word begins to speak more to the accuser than the accused:

1) In recent years we've heard sweeping indictments of cops being called racist, even as officers involved in a deadly confrontation were black themselves.
2) George Zimmerman was branded a racist despite being 1/2 Latino and having African American Girlfriends.
3) A cop in Cambridge Mass was branded as a racist for asking a black Harvard professor for identification when the professor was having difficulty unlocking his front door and some sort of argument ensued when the professor took exception to the request.

At face value, Trump has said what many consider racially insensitive for his comments about wanting to keep illegal immigrants from crossing the border and adding that some of them come here to commit crimes. HE also called for a ban on Muslims entering this country until we can figure out who the terrorists are. With better use of language, many if not most Americans would agree with that sentiment.

Apparently, the Trump corporation hires many minority employees, promotes some into positions of responsbility, and pays them well. His Corporation has a disproportionate number of female executives, and reportedly pay them on an equal scale to men in similar positions.

When he claimed that the primary process was rigged to elect party favorites, he was 1000% correct, and now the wikileaks have validated that egregious and horrific plans to attack Sanders both for being a Jew in the south (where being Jewish doesn't play well) and an atheist as well.

You would think that the preumptive party nominee would run a million miles from the persons behind these plans to manipulate the results of the primaries to insure her victory. Instead, Clinton immediately hire Debbie Wasserman Schultz to reward her for her dishonesty.

I am unsure of how good a President Trump will make. I am in favor though of running government like a business - you know, simple things like spending less than you take in, and trying to grow prosperity instead of taxing more. Of course, these are novel concepts, and the uncertainty of a Trump Presidency for me is offset by the certainty that Hillary Clinton is an incompetent liar who alienates the majority of Americans, and whose meddling into foreign affairs with no resume to do so has made shambles of the middle east and given rise to ISIS, even as Iraq was becoming a stable nation.

No one is convinced in political discussions, but I have had some very good off line dialogue with those on here who can be civil even with an opposing view. For my part however, I'm done with following party lines of demonizing those with malice and without much evidence.

Has he uttered a single anti-black sentiment? I'm not opposed to civil dialogue when the other party is capable, or else I will pass. Thanks - have a good one.
 
Did you read the NY Times article or just decide to write 1,500 words to share your thoughts with us? White, black, red, green or yellow, Trump's a racist.

Wish George RR Martin had you on staff. Would have had the rest of the ASOIAF books done long ago.

To assign the word racist to any caucasian person today is done today as a broad reaching indictment designed to mostly disqualify and defame. For those who are listening, the repeated use of the word begins to speak more to the accuser than the accused:

1) In recent years we've heard sweeping indictments of cops being called racist, even as officers involved in a deadly confrontation were black themselves.
2) George Zimmerman was branded a racist despite being 1/2 Latino and having African American Girlfriends.
3) A cop in Cambridge Mass was branded as a racist for asking a black Harvard professor for identification when the professor was having difficulty unlocking his front door and some sort of argument ensued when the professor took exception to the request.

At face value, Trump has said what many consider racially insensitive for his comments about wanting to keep illegal immigrants from crossing the border and adding that some of them come here to commit crimes. HE also called for a ban on Muslims entering this country until we can figure out who the terrorists are. With better use of language, many if not most Americans would agree with that sentiment.

Apparently, the Trump corporation hires many minority employees, promotes some into positions of responsbility, and pays them well. His Corporation has a disproportionate number of female executives, and reportedly pay them on an equal scale to men in similar positions.

When he claimed that the primary process was rigged to elect party favorites, he was 1000% correct, and now the wikileaks have validated that egregious and horrific plans to attack Sanders both for being a Jew in the south (where being Jewish doesn't play well) and an atheist as well.

You would think that the preumptive party nominee would run a million miles from the persons behind these plans to manipulate the results of the primaries to insure her victory. Instead, Clinton immediately hire Debbie Wasserman Schultz to reward her for her dishonesty.

I am unsure of how good a President Trump will make. I am in favor though of running government like a business - you know, simple things like spending less than you take in, and trying to grow prosperity instead of taxing more. Of course, these are novel concepts, and the uncertainty of a Trump Presidency for me is offset by the certainty that Hillary Clinton is an incompetent liar who alienates the majority of Americans, and whose meddling into foreign affairs with no resume to do so has made shambles of the middle east and given rise to ISIS, even as Iraq was becoming a stable nation.

No one is convinced in political discussions, but I have had some very good off line dialogue with those on here who can be civil even with an opposing view. For my part however, I'm done with following party lines of demonizing those with malice and without much evidence.

Has he uttered a single anti-black sentiment? I'm not opposed to civil dialogue when the other party is capable, or else I will pass. Thanks - have a good one.

So you didn't read the article. Thanks - have a good one as well.
 
Did you read the NY Times article or just decide to write 1,500 words to share your thoughts with us? White, black, red, green or yellow, Trump's a racist.

Wish George RR Martin had you on staff. Would have had the rest of the ASOIAF books done long ago.

To assign the word racist to any caucasian person today is done today as a broad reaching indictment designed to mostly disqualify and defame. For those who are listening, the repeated use of the word begins to speak more to the accuser than the accused:

1) In recent years we've heard sweeping indictments of cops being called racist, even as officers involved in a deadly confrontation were black themselves.
2) George Zimmerman was branded a racist despite being 1/2 Latino and having African American Girlfriends.
3) A cop in Cambridge Mass was branded as a racist for asking a black Harvard professor for identification when the professor was having difficulty unlocking his front door and some sort of argument ensued when the professor took exception to the request.

At face value, Trump has said what many consider racially insensitive for his comments about wanting to keep illegal immigrants from crossing the border and adding that some of them come here to commit crimes. HE also called for a ban on Muslims entering this country until we can figure out who the terrorists are. With better use of language, many if not most Americans would agree with that sentiment.

Apparently, the Trump corporation hires many minority employees, promotes some into positions of responsbility, and pays them well. His Corporation has a disproportionate number of female executives, and reportedly pay them on an equal scale to men in similar positions.

When he claimed that the primary process was rigged to elect party favorites, he was 1000% correct, and now the wikileaks have validated that egregious and horrific plans to attack Sanders both for being a Jew in the south (where being Jewish doesn't play well) and an atheist as well.

You would think that the preumptive party nominee would run a million miles from the persons behind these plans to manipulate the results of the primaries to insure her victory. Instead, Clinton immediately hire Debbie Wasserman Schultz to reward her for her dishonesty.

I am unsure of how good a President Trump will make. I am in favor though of running government like a business - you know, simple things like spending less than you take in, and trying to grow prosperity instead of taxing more. Of course, these are novel concepts, and the uncertainty of a Trump Presidency for me is offset by the certainty that Hillary Clinton is an incompetent liar who alienates the majority of Americans, and whose meddling into foreign affairs with no resume to do so has made shambles of the middle east and given rise to ISIS, even as Iraq was becoming a stable nation.

No one is convinced in political discussions, but I have had some very good off line dialogue with those on here who can be civil even with an opposing view. For my part however, I'm done with following party lines of demonizing those with malice and without much evidence.

Has he uttered a single anti-black sentiment? I'm not opposed to civil dialogue when the other party is capable, or else I will pass. Thanks - have a good one.

So you didn't read the article. Thanks - have a good one as well.

The Washington Post piece isn't an article - It's clearly labeled an opinion. Like most hit pieces it offers generalizations and was not well researched.

For example:

1) Donald Trump has no electoral experience, and the first since Dwight D. Eisenhower to gain a party's nomination. This is true, but several over recent years has tried to gain their party's nomination without electoral experience, such as Ralph Nader and Ross Perot. To some extent Trump's nomination is a manifestation of the neophyte Obama gaining the Presidency after declaring candidacy after serving only 150 days as a Senator.

2) Commentary on Muslims celebrating 9/11. Although that has long been rumored to have occurred no one can produce evidence of it. However, there was a much repeated video clip from the middle east of people dancing in the street and a toothless woman handing out candy to children in celebration.

3) Trump has been critical of trade deals, China;s manipulation of their currency, the loss of manufacturing jobs and outsourcing of jobs. What the article omits is that Trump has been critical of the US removing sanctions, releasing billions of $ of frozen funds and giving Iran nuclear capability while getting nothing in return. Kerry did offer that the US would monitor their use of nuclear development to preclude weapons development. The ink was barely dry before Iran said like hell you will - the US is out enemy. Would you like to discuss Cuba? Millions of Cubans oppressed by a dictatorship that is on its last gasps as there is no longer support from the Soviets - Raul Castro does, and likely the government crumbles. What does the US do? Remove sanctions without even addressing a single human rights violation. For all of it's pro gay posturing, in the Iran deal, the US failed to even mention the torture and murder of gays in Iran and other parts of the middle east.

So, not for you, but for others who would like to discuss chapter and verse a position paper in the Time or Post that is extremely slanted, I am more than capable.
 
Back
Top