As I said 2+ years ago when Steve got the job and the Redman board graciously allowed me to join y'all here. Steve Lavin is a different kind of animal, and he didn't come back to coaching to "settle" for "good" or "very good". Despite the negativity of Bruin fans, he had ALREADY acchieved those goals in his coaching career. His new gameplan is for "excellence" and "greatness". That's why he chose THIS school, put together THIS coaching staff, and especially why he has targeted and landed the players he has. Would have been real easy to have "settled" for the signed 6 we already had, and move on to next year's recruiting. But even with multiple NBA and NBDL level centers developed in his 7 year UCLA career (Jelani McCoy, Dan Gadzuric, Jerome Moiso, Ryan Hollins, Mike Fey), he's never had that potentially GREAT defensive center. McCoy was the closest, but he smoked himself out of his potential collegiate greatness.
Folks are picturing St. Johns as some wild run-n-gun offensive team. That may well be. But if you look at the kids that have truly been targeted and landed, the Lavin Gameplan is pretty obvious. I haven't read a single article this year where the subject is brought up that Obekpa isn't considered at WORST the 3rd best defensive center in high school this year. Rivals branded Jamal Branch as the BEST defensive player in all of high school just a year ago. In a listing of the top 10 defensive players in the entire 2011 high school class, Branch was joined by BOTH Amir Garret and Sir Dom.
Obekpa is very likely the missing peice between "good" and "very good" for the coming year - and maybe even a cornerstone for "great" in year or two years or 3 years after that. Obekpa can be that piece that Norvell Pelle (6'10 defensive stalwart and shotblocking savant) MIGHT have been had he qualified.
Excuse the over exuberance. But after 16 years as a lone voice in the night (a UCLA Lavin fan!), every single bit of ammo that can be loaded into the "I told you so" arsenal MUST be savored!
Congratuations to Chris on making a delayed but CORRECT decision. And to the staff for keeping the "eye on the prize" throughout.