Too bad Chang's not around she could have payed for the Lapchick statue.
Isnt this story really old news?
Like from summer 2010?
The Prof that commented (PROFTERP) nailed it:
As a recipient of an MBA from St. John's, I am appalled by this 20+ year fraud. I am a college professor and one of the classes I teach is Business Fraud. It is difficult to fathom that she did this without tacit approval of Harrington and Wile. If they were, as they claim, unaware and duped by Chang, they should be removed by the Board of Trustees for no less than being incompetent
I know both men and their families well. Wile's brother, Derek, is an STJ grad that is always at the games. I can tell you that they are all good people and certainly not the villains many could think after reading a story like that. Should they have known? Maybe...probably...but Chang was a con artist and rarely on campus.
I just don't see how this stuff didn't come up earlier through internal audits.
The Prof that commented (PROFTERP) nailed it:
As a recipient of an MBA from St. John's, I am appalled by this 20+ year fraud. I am a college professor and one of the classes I teach is Business Fraud. It is difficult to fathom that she did this without tacit approval of Harrington and Wile. If they were, as they claim, unaware and duped by Chang, they should be removed by the Board of Trustees for no less than being incompetent
Our Board of Trustees has no such authority to remove Harrington. They were all appointed by him, mostly for being large donors who get the prestilge of being on a board in return for their generosity. The Vincentian novitiate pulls all the strings, and like the church sexual abuse scandal and bishops, I am sure they jsut want this to blow over unless it has an adverse affect on donations. That is unlikely since big donors care little about a little scandal.
This article does not mention, but explains why Jim Pellow (COO) and Tom Nedelle (CFO) left so quickly but very quietly. Makes you think and wonder what else is going on that has been kept out of the public eye. Im surprised but glad this has not become a bigger story.
The only reason why Harrington is still there is because he still brings in alot of money (compared to cahill). Which makes you question the values of the university.
This article does not mention, but explains why Jim Pellow (COO) and Tom Nedelle (CFO) left so quickly but very quietly. Makes you think and wonder what else is going on that has been kept out of the public eye. Im surprised but glad this has not become a bigger story.
The only reason why Harrington is still there is because he still brings in alot of money (compared to cahill). Which makes you question the values of the university.
Wasn't Pellow the guy who wanted Matt Dougherty
The Prof that commented (PROFTERP) nailed it:
As a recipient of an MBA from St. John's, I am appalled by this 20+ year fraud. I am a college professor and one of the classes I teach is Business Fraud. It is difficult to fathom that she did this without tacit approval of Harrington and Wile. If they were, as they claim, unaware and duped by Chang, they should be removed by the Board of Trustees for no less than being incompetent
Our Board of Trustees has no such authority to remove Harrington. They were all appointed by him, mostly for being large donors who get the prestilge of being on a board in return for their generosity. The Vincentian novitiate pulls all the strings, and like the church sexual abuse scandal and bishops, I am sure they jsut want this to blow over unless it has an adverse affect on donations. That is unlikely since big donors care little about a little scandal.
The eastern province of the Mission of Charity I believe is the leadership. They are located in Germantown, PA. Considering the corporate entity Harrington has built, he likely wields significant power in the order, but that could be yanked by them in an instant.
Who has the authority to remove him then
This article does not mention, but explains why Jim Pellow (COO) and Tom Nedelle (CFO) left so quickly but very quietly. Makes you think and wonder what else is going on that has been kept out of the public eye. Im surprised but glad this has not become a bigger story.
The only reason why Harrington is still there is because he still brings in alot of money (compared to cahill). Which makes you question the values of the university.
Wasn't Pellow the guy who wanted Matt Dougherty
No
This article does not mention, but explains why Jim Pellow (COO) and Tom Nedelle (CFO) left so quickly but very quietly. Makes you think and wonder what else is going on that has been kept out of the public eye. Im surprised but glad this has not become a bigger story.
The only reason why Harrington is still there is because he still brings in alot of money (compared to cahill). Which makes you question the values of the university.
Wasn't Pellow the guy who wanted Matt Dougherty
No
Then who am I thinking of ?. And didn't Pellow's name come up somewhere in the replacing Norm era.
Was there an answer to Moose's question somewhere in that response? Thanks.The Prof that commented (PROFTERP) nailed it:
As a recipient of an MBA from St. John's, I am appalled by this 20+ year fraud. I am a college professor and one of the classes I teach is Business Fraud. It is difficult to fathom that she did this without tacit approval of Harrington and Wile. If they were, as they claim, unaware and duped by Chang, they should be removed by the Board of Trustees for no less than being incompetent
Our Board of Trustees has no such authority to remove Harrington. They were all appointed by him, mostly for being large donors who get the prestilge of being on a board in return for their generosity. The Vincentian novitiate pulls all the strings, and like the church sexual abuse scandal and bishops, I am sure they jsut want this to blow over unless it has an adverse affect on donations. That is unlikely since big donors care little about a little scandal.
The eastern province of the Mission of Charity I believe is the leadership. They are located in Germantown, PA. Considering the corporate entity Harrington has built, he likely wields significant power in the order, but that could be yanked by them in an instant.
Who has the authority to remove him then
Was there an answer to Moose's question somewhere in that response? Thanks.The Prof that commented (PROFTERP) nailed it:
As a recipient of an MBA from St. John's, I am appalled by this 20+ year fraud. I am a college professor and one of the classes I teach is Business Fraud. It is difficult to fathom that she did this without tacit approval of Harrington and Wile. If they were, as they claim, unaware and duped by Chang, they should be removed by the Board of Trustees for no less than being incompetent
Our Board of Trustees has no such authority to remove Harrington. They were all appointed by him, mostly for being large donors who get the prestilge of being on a board in return for their generosity. The Vincentian novitiate pulls all the strings, and like the church sexual abuse scandal and bishops, I am sure they jsut want this to blow over unless it has an adverse affect on donations. That is unlikely since big donors care little about a little scandal.
The eastern province of the Mission of Charity I believe is the leadership. They are located in Germantown, PA. Considering the corporate entity Harrington has built, he likely wields significant power in the order, but that could be yanked by them in an instant.
Who has the authority to remove him then
A disturbing story about the University and its' leadership. Or, lack thereof.
As a graduate of the College of Business Administration in the late 60's, I never warmed to Father Harrington in his Presidency. I thought he pursued questionable plans in adding dorms, took the University from being the largest Catholic University in the USA to a lower student level. DePaul becoming larger under Harrington.
He also seemed little interested in raising Academic Standing of the University, which it was poised to do under Father Cahill. Under Cahill, President Ronald Reagan visited the University and, at the time our Law School was ranked at the top for Bar Assoc passage rates.
I also believed FH understood little of the BB identity of the school and by doing so, contributed to the downslide that has occurred over his tenure. He made horrible decisions in meddling in Coaching selections and Jarvis and Roberts were very poor choices..Many, including Lavin believe the brand can be restored to its' former level of excellence but, we've had many years of mismanagement of the program. That jury is still out.
I do think FH has exceeded his time as President and, if the Pope can retire, so can he. It's time for new leadership and I hope the Vincentians are up to it.. We'll see..
Although Harrington has something to do with the mismanagement of the program and its down slide i place most of the blame on Monash whom most people can agree needs to be ousted as well.
To me, there will always be the possibility of hiring a dirty employee. The fact that Harrington stuffed cash into his locked drawer and claims he funneled it to charity is such a load of horsecrap that the guy should be bounced immediately. The guy whom I understand is not close with any of the other priests living on campus, simply got too big for his vestments, and instead fancied himself a CEO and powerbroker like all his appointments to the board of trustees. After all, doesn't a CEO of a University deserve a few percs when his donors are earning 7 and 8 figure salaries?