[quote="Paul Massell" post=385096][quote="MCNPA" post=385092][quote="Paul Massell" post=385088]Of the guys I've seen, Ty Grant has a legitimate argument as the most effective as a big but Berry would be the guy. [/quote]
Oddly enough, ty grant only averaged 7.3pts and 6.6 rebs for his career which isn’t amazing as far as numbers go. I wonder how all these guys compare stats-wise because often our memories of these guys is better than their real world production. Look at a guy like Champagnie who as a freshman (albeit not a big), has averaged 9.9 and 6.5 and it puts into perspective not only how good he is but the overall numbers in comparison.[/quote]
I knew that and I was going by the OP that specified guys who "weren't afraid to get into the trenches." Obviously Jayson Williams stats are way better than Grant but on those terms and as a player for St. John's (certainly in the NBA he became a beast) he was not as effective as Grant in my opinion. Stats are important but as a big man you are a presence. Can your teammates rely upon you to catch the ball? Can you get position on opposing bigs on both ends of the court. Things like that. At around 6'7 Grant was very strong and couldn't be bodied on either end. Pretty much money under the basket. He was undervalued and underused by his first coach but became much more effective when he got used.
I really like Champagnie and overall he will probably be a better basketball player than Grant, but he is not a dominating physical presence who will impose his will inside. He's a multi-dimensional player with inside/out skills.[/quote]
A healthy Grant and we're a Final 4 team in 1999. Maybe better...
Oddly enough, ty grant only averaged 7.3pts and 6.6 rebs for his career which isn’t amazing as far as numbers go. I wonder how all these guys compare stats-wise because often our memories of these guys is better than their real world production. Look at a guy like Champagnie who as a freshman (albeit not a big), has averaged 9.9 and 6.5 and it puts into perspective not only how good he is but the overall numbers in comparison.[/quote]
I knew that and I was going by the OP that specified guys who "weren't afraid to get into the trenches." Obviously Jayson Williams stats are way better than Grant but on those terms and as a player for St. John's (certainly in the NBA he became a beast) he was not as effective as Grant in my opinion. Stats are important but as a big man you are a presence. Can your teammates rely upon you to catch the ball? Can you get position on opposing bigs on both ends of the court. Things like that. At around 6'7 Grant was very strong and couldn't be bodied on either end. Pretty much money under the basket. He was undervalued and underused by his first coach but became much more effective when he got used.
I really like Champagnie and overall he will probably be a better basketball player than Grant, but he is not a dominating physical presence who will impose his will inside. He's a multi-dimensional player with inside/out skills.[/quote]
A healthy Grant and we're a Final 4 team in 1999. Maybe better...