Class of 72
Active member
It's head coaches being insulated...not a racial issue....
The fact that head coaches are predominantly white may be a racial issue. In cases such as these assistants are paid to provide plausible deniability - regardless of race.
Regardless of race, these head coaches better pray they are clean, because if I'm an assistant with a wife and a couple kids, I'm singing like a canary to get as little jail time as possible.
Black assistant coaches hired to recruit black players. Shocking!
"A Minneapolis Star-Tribune study last season found only 13 African-American head coaches among the 75 major-conference college basketball programs. That’s 17 percent, in a sport where well over half of the players are African-American. The message is once their eligibility is used up and they are no longer of service on the court, there are few prominent places for African-Americans in the sport."
African Americans make up 14% of the population. Head coaches of African American descent are represented above the national average at 17%. However, over ten years ago black head coaches made up 33% of the head coaching positions at the top 75 programs. In a sport where the longevity of your job is determined by wins/losses, Black head coaches in most cases were replaced by white head coaches with winning records at other programs. One exception was at St. John's where we replaced Jarvis with an assistant coach from Kansas without a proven track record. The results speak for themselves.
Absent in the argument is the school's objective to hire the best talent rather than following a racial quota. Black athletes make up 75% of D1 basketball players. A rational argument would be that mostly white universities recruit mostly black players because they are more talented than their white peers. Also missing is any correlation that links a school's basketball success to having black head coaches. Even President Obama couldn't prevent Craig Robinson from being canned.
Fact of the matter is that because you were a star basketball "player" doesn't mean that you are better candidate for a head coaching job. Our own coach may yet prove that the ability to run a program is unrelated to playing the game at a high level.
The Seattle Times said at the time of Robinson's firing "Robinson is a good, fair man who was a classy representative of OSU. But his teams were poorly prepared and unfailingly leaky on defense. His last four teams were in the bottom three of the league in field-goal defense. Those four also led the conference in points allowed, which he would contend was a function of playing uptempo."
Sound familiar? Hopefully coach Mullin learns from Robinson's coaching deficiencies and should he fail I hope we don't use race as a factor in hiring his replacement because we have already been down that road at St. John's.