He has had a lot to say about other teams, refs, his players, etc. First year when things were going well for Providence I thought he is this personable, positive guy, something like Lavin with maybe coaching ability. As soon as things went south in Year 2 you saw a whole different side of him.
The historical LMF theory of coaches who inherit strong programs is that you throw out the first year, you put some weight on the second year, and by the third year you start to have an idea what the guy really is. The fourth year you know for sure. Examples that come to mind are Juwan Howard at Michigan (bad) and Jamie Dixon at Pitt (good).
I don't know if that theory is still applicable in the modern world - the variables are just much different than they used to be. But there is definitely reason to believe that Year 1 English was a beneficiary of the Cooley tailwind and that Year 2 is more representative of who he actually is.
I don't think Providence will be as bad this year, and given the top-heaviness of the conference I think they can be a middle-of-the-pack option and get over .500 by a bit. But I don't know that it will be enough progress for English to be retained if the decision is "fire or extend."
Overall Providence is in a tough spot, they are ahead of Seton Hall but definitely towards the lower end of the conference in funding and attractiveness to players.