SJU Double Alumn
Member
1- You don't need to look at Mullin's first season to see that his hiring was a ridiculous mistake more about the press conference than intelligently bringing in the best coach, and that his tenure was abysmal.Beast of the East post=448536 said:1)Nobody holds him to that season. In other words nobody said Mullin was unfit because he went 1-17. That's total crap. Nearly every Mullin detractor has pointed to his conference record over time.
2)The idea that the previous coach is to blame is nonsense, part of roster issue is because kids de-committed because of the coaching change. Why is that Lavin's fault? It is not Mullin's fault either but you are acting like Lavin intentionally got fired. That was a price you paid for that move. Whoever was the coach would've probably been on a 2 yr rebuild of the roster. Even if Lavin was retained. So what. The point is correctly stated that Mullin was left with 3 guys who were not even close to being Big East players, and that's as bad as it could possibly had gotten.
3)Mullin's problems ran much deeper, he simply did not want to put in the work to be a HC. Period. That became painfully obvious when all they wanted to do was play the transfer market. That had nothing to do with a thin roster his first year. Sorry, no period here. I hope the next time you have a very close relative suffering from a terminal illness that your boss doesn't expect you to put in the enormous effort it takes to coach a college basketball team. Admittedly, Mullin did not understand when he took the job that running a college program is a 12 month job. He didn't expect that he'd have a problem requiring him to split his family and in hindsight should have flown them here for the summer, but given the nature of the problem, that likely was not a suitable answer. Ironically, by the time he left here, those problems had all recently been resolved permanently.
4)In retrospect the move to make in 2015 was to hire Danny Hurley. Hurley got $4 million from UCONN. Even if we paid him $2 million, he'd have been gone by now and still at UCONN. PERIOD. For the record half of UCONN's fans on their board are calling for him to be fired.
All of that is not to say that changing coaches was a bad idea. Mullin's tenure was not successful enough to be retained, but I do feel that with a few changes, he could have been very successful and a real AD could have helped.
2- What recruits did Mullin have ready to come in after his 4th season? He also left the next coach a bad situation.
3- Everyone deals with personal issues. You either can do your job or you can't. Was Mullin working all hours and making a year-round effort at any point that he was the coach?
4- Hurley was one of several coaches that we could have pursued, as well as the option of retaining Lavin (who was doing great here until he himself had to make a cancer recovery that limited his activities but you don't seem to be defending Lavin much based on that).
No AD would have made any difference to the authority Mullin had to make the decisions that were made.