12 Greatest Players In St. John's History

Keep in mind, historically on mediocre or worse teams the guy who is asked to carry the load would never score like that on a good team.

Keep in mind that the teams Harrison played on were less successful than the ones Hatten played on and that despite the fact that Hatten was counted on to carry the scoring load he created twice as many shots for teammates as did Harrison.
 
Hatten was better than Harrison...sorry but that shouldn't even be a debate and I also happen to like Harrison but come on......

Hatten is the all time scoring leader in Big East games (by average).

1400 points in two years. He was a one man wrecking machine.

I think a lot of fans who were students or around that age have latched onto Hatten because he was the team's best offensive weapon when they were introduced to SJU bball. As much as I've been critical over time of Harrison being more than a scorer than a great shooter, Harrison has legitimate three point range. Hatten was a poor three point shooter, shooting only 29% from beyond the arc. His two teams finished 7-9 and 9-7 in conference, one ncaa appearance, and an NIT championship. He was quicker than Harrison, and could take the ball to the hoop better. His shooting range was really not more than 15 feet and in, which is why he had no shot at all for the NBA.

As guards they both rebounded well, and although Hatten had more assists, everything revolved around him on offense.

I would take Harrison over Hatten. I always had the feeling that on a great SJU team, Hatten would not have played or scored nearly as much. If we compare Harrison's junior and senior season to Hatten, I think I'd find a place for D'angelo even on our Final Four team, but I'd pass on Hatten on that squad. Just an opinion.

I'd also think I would take Glen Williams over Hatten. Williams was a silky smooth shooting guard, who was an early second round pick of the Milwaukee Bucks.

While the argument against Hatten is always "he didnt shoot a high percentage" he also didnt have the luxury of being surrounded by the talent Harrison has had.

When you take a look at all around game, in particular, defense, Hatten was far superior to Harrison in that area - he was top 3 in the country in steals, great on the ball and off the ball defender.

Also, Hatten was a more prolific scorer - single handedly winning games for SJU, theone that i realy remember was coming back from 16 down at GTown in 2003 where he dropped 34 points - completely unstoppable....he was more versatile due to his athleticism which allowe d him to drive to the hoop more, whereas Harrison is more of a shooter (you will never see Hatten take a pull up three pointer on a fast break like Harrison does).

Lastly, with way less talent around him Hatten's two teams have accomplished more than any two teams Harrison was on (jury still out this year) and although i hold no depth and weight in winning an NIT, it is still better than being run out of your own gym in round 1 vs Robert Morris or a second round loss to UVA. And Hatten has an NCAA Tournament appearance, which we may get this year....but to me Hatten was a better player and that is nothing against Harrison who is great in his own right but having watched a lot of each of them i would take Hatten.

Agree to disagree. :)

It's fair. We can disagree. Keep in mind, historically on mediocre or worse teams the guy who is asked to carry the load would never score like that on a good team. For the most part I don't like guards who score but can't shoot well, but that's a preference.

"mediocre to worse" teams - are you referencing Harrison's teams or Hatten's teams?

Hatten's teams were more successful than Harrison's.....
 
Mel Davis: 20.9 pts / 15.6 reb
Leroy Ellis: 17 pts / 12.2 reb
George Johnson: 15.1 pts / 10.6 reb

Bill Wennington: 8.2 pts / 4.3 reb

Billy Schaefer- 18.9 pts / 7.9 rebs

Billy Schaeffer had one of the greatest senior seasons ever at SJU. He was a one man show that pretty much single handedly won the Holiday Festival against a strong field that included South Carolina, and a week or so later hit a buzzer beater to beat powerhouse Davidson on the road. He rebounded well for his size and shot nearly 60% from the field. If Mel Davis would have been on that team, they could have been something special.

Mel Davis was awesome. We have not had a monster rebounder like him since. If he didn't tear up his knee in the NIT, his career stats, already impressive through 2 seasons, would have blown up his senior year. Instead he went to the NBA where he seemed to lose all his confidence under Red Holzman.

Maybe Marcus Hatten isn't top 12, but he is awfully close.

Agree 100% about Billy and Mel
Billy camped out on the baseline about 15 feet out and drained shot after shot
Mel was a monster until he suffered the knee injury against Oral Roberts
I was really pissed when Looie left because Frank Mulzoff was a horrible coach
With all that talent, he couldn't coach his way out of a paper bag

Remember too that neither Billy nor Mel were able to play Freshman year.
 
Mel Davis: 20.9 pts / 15.6 reb
Leroy Ellis: 17 pts / 12.2 reb
George Johnson: 15.1 pts / 10.6 reb

Bill Wennington: 8.2 pts / 4.3 reb

Rob Werdann's stats are probably just as impressive and that's even including his injury plagued senior season.
 
I'm wondering if anyone on here old enough to have seen Kevin Loughery at St. John's could comment on how good he was a collegian?

Saw him on my first visit to Alumni when he destroyed my Violet team with Hairston and Kramer as sophomores. Could not miss assassin with no frills efficiency from what would have been three point range.
 
Mel Davis: 20.9 pts / 15.6 reb
Leroy Ellis: 17 pts / 12.2 reb
George Johnson: 15.1 pts / 10.6 reb

Bill Wennington: 8.2 pts / 4.3 reb

Billy Schaefer- 18.9 pts / 7.9 rebs

Billy Schaeffer had one of the greatest senior seasons ever at SJU. He was a one man show that pretty much single handedly won the Holiday Festival against a strong field that included South Carolina, and a week or so later hit a buzzer beater to beat powerhouse Davidson on the road. He rebounded well for his size and shot nearly 60% from the field. If Mel Davis would have been on that team, they could have been something special.

Mel Davis was awesome. We have not had a monster rebounder like him since. If he didn't tear up his knee in the NIT, his career stats, already impressive through 2 seasons, would have blown up his senior year. Instead he went to the NBA where he seemed to lose all his confidence under Red Holzman.

Maybe Marcus Hatten isn't top 12, but he is awfully close.

Agree 100% about Billy and Mel
Billy camped out on the baseline about 15 feet out and drained shot after shot
Mel was a monster until he suffered the knee injury against Oral Roberts
I was really pissed when Looie left because Frank Mulzoff was a horrible coach
With all that talent, he couldn't coach his way out of a paper bag

Only thing good about Frank Mulzoff's coaching was his red socks.
 
Mel Davis: 20.9 pts / 15.6 reb
Leroy Ellis: 17 pts / 12.2 reb
George Johnson: 15.1 pts / 10.6 reb

Bill Wennington: 8.2 pts / 4.3 reb

Rob Werdann's stats are probably just as impressive and that's even including his injury plagued senior season.

Bob Werdan: 9.7 / 6.9
A Glover: 11.2 / 5.9
L Hamilton: 11.8 / 6.6
J Williams: 14.9 / 6.8
Zendon: 15.9 / 8.3
 
Mel Davis: 20.9 pts / 15.6 reb
Leroy Ellis: 17 pts / 12.2 reb
George Johnson: 15.1 pts / 10.6 reb

Bill Wennington: 8.2 pts / 4.3 reb

Rob Werdann's stats are probably just as impressive and that's even including his injury plagued senior season.

Bob Werdan: 9.7 / 6.9
A Glover: 11.2 / 5.9
L Hamilton: 11.8 / 6.6
J Williams: 14.9 / 6.8
Zendon: 15.9 / 8.3

Shawnelle Scott: 10.5 / 6.3
David Russel : 14.6 / 6.8
S Jones: 10.8 / 5.9


Wennington: 8.2 pts / 4.3 reb
Jeff Allen: 6.0 / 4.5
 
I'm wondering if anyone on here old enough to have seen Kevin Loughery at St. John's could comment on how good he was a collegian?

While he probably was best known for his coaching, Loughery was one of the finest SG's in SJ history. I don't have stats in front of me, but I'm sure his percentages are up there with our best. I remember him to be an "ice man" at the foul stripe. There was a game at CA against Miami with Rick Barry (I think). We were down to the wire trailing by one and Loughery had the ball. He seemingly dribbled lazily around the key and with the game clock almost at zero launched a jumper that won the game.
That's why these "greatest" type lists are always troublesome to me, because they rarely take into account the value an individual player contributed.
 
What about Kenny McIntyre? I think his foul shot percentage was in the 80"s and he was a great contributor to winning games during the end of Lapchick's tenure.
 
Hatten was better when he took control and played lead guard. DLo excelled within the confines of a 2 guard and never loses awareness that he is not alone on the floor. His creative passing, rebounding, defense are all exceptional and I've aways been very impressed with his knowledge of the game. How he got that good against the competition he was playing is amazing. I truly hope somebody in the league realizes how good he really is. Screw the stopwatches and rulers and let the guy do his thing.for the paying customers. He is a fanpleaser and is good for the game.
 
Hatten was better when he took control and played lead guard. DLo excelled within the confines of a 2 guard and never loses awareness that he is not alone on the floor. His creative passing, rebounding, defense are all exceptional and I've aways been very impressed with his knowledge of the game. How he got that good against the competition he was playing is amazing. I truly hope somebody in the league realizes how good he really is. Screw the stopwatches and rulers and let the guy do his thing.for the paying customers. He is a fanpleaser and is good for the game.

And I can imagine one of the Texas NBA teams realizing that with a late pick.
 
Hatten was better when he took control and played lead guard. DLo excelled within the confines of a 2 guard and never loses awareness that he is not alone on the floor. His creative passing, rebounding, defense are all exceptional and I've aways been very impressed with his knowledge of the game. How he got that good against the competition he was playing is amazing. I truly hope somebody in the league realizes how good he really is. Screw the stopwatches and rulers and let the guy do his thing.for the paying customers. He is a fanpleaser and is good for the game.

I thought you were going to complain that Sean Evans was excluded from the list :)
 
Hatten was better when he took control and played lead guard. DLo excelled within the confines of a 2 guard and never loses awareness that he is not alone on the floor. His creative passing, rebounding, defense are all exceptional and I've aways been very impressed with his knowledge of the game. How he got that good against the competition he was playing is amazing. I truly hope somebody in the league realizes how good he really is. Screw the stopwatches and rulers and let the guy do his thing.for the paying customers. He is a fanpleaser and is good for the game.

Wow! I agree with Bobre.
 
Reggie Carter was very good also, He transferred home from Hawaii University and didn't play all four years but that team with Carter, Rencher, Plair, Gilroy and Wayne McCoy was an excellent team. I think they were ranked 8th in the country.
 
Overlooked is the sixth man on the Wonder Five team, Herbert "Spitty" Carmichael, winner of the Elyssian Athletic Union Trophy for dropping 6 on Westminster.
 
Hatten vs Harrison: I'll wait to see what DH does in the Tourney this year for final consideration but here is my thinking: Initial impression is that Hatten is the bigger impact player and better defender. Although it is not exactly apples to apples because I think DH is more versatile as a defender. I don't think that Hatten could have legitimately defended in the post against huge guys, as DH has done. Also DH spent considerable time getting double and tripled so I don't think you can claim that Hatten had it tougher and his assist numbers support that.

Hatten was one of the greatest improvisors ever but what would Hatten do on a team that required coaching and teamwork? I don't know. Seems to me that DH has a total brain fart against G'town (superstition or whatever) and he's a senior that should be bigger and wiser than that and he's got one game left to remedy that and the rest of the season and Tourney to make the final case.
 
I don't think it's either/or between Hatten and Harrison. I've seen virtually every game both played and they brought/bring different strengths to the court. Both were/are good, borderline great college players. I can imagine circumstances and teams where one would be preferable to the other.

That said, I'm pretty clear on the kind of leader Harrison is. I have no idea about Hatten in that regard. That might be the tie breaker.
 
Back
Top