There really is no excuse for not having comfortable seating. If they have to get rid of a few hundred seats, so be it. Get rid of the top 10 rows on each side near the moon that no one sits in, and adjust using the space accordingly. In a day in age where SJ rakes in 40k per year from each student at a university with 20,000 total students, there is no excuse. This school makes a ton of money and a lot of it comes from basketball, so improving and maintaining that valuable asset should be essential. If that means removing seats to make more room or spending a lot to expand and adding backs to all the chairs with some padding then so be it... it's something that can and should be done. Have you seen SUNY Binghamton's on campus stadium? The place is amazing and has very nice comfortable seats. Yet, we at SJ, a 20,000 student school in the Big East and a storied basketball history can't do it? I can't buy that.
Just so you are aware, 95% of SJU students receive scholarship money or grant in aid, courtesy of generous donors. I believe you had mentioned that you were receiving some sort of partial scholarship to attend grad school. Without donors, capital improvements wouldn't happen. St. John's and FH have done an amazing job of transforming the campus over the past 20 years. A new on campus arena was never considered a priority once the bulk of the big games were shifted to MSG, something that Hofstra or other lesser programs do not have the luxury of. I don't recall the exist figure, but I believe the CA renovation was budgeted at $20 million. It was given a facelift instead of radical changes.
In terms of whining about the bleachers, before the makeover, Carnesecca himself (and Mahoney) sat in the bleachers behind the basket in what is now the student section. IF a then 70 something year old HOF coach can sit in bleachers, I guess I can too.
In terms of inequities of our basketball arena, it takes one major thing to accomplish - alumni donations. Universities by themselves do not generate tons of profit. Nearly all would lose money without substantial public funding or private donations. Look at the endowments of Harvard or Yale - their alumni have built their endowments byond $50 billion. St. John's endowment, with 20,000 students, and hundreds of thousands of alumni, is about $300 million - paltry by almost all private university standards.
The problem with donations is that way too many people think it is someone else's job. Riley, who has been torched here, was one of our most generous donors, giving millions to the university, and helping students get jobs with Goldman Sachs. Many of us think its up to "wealthy" people to donate, not us personally. In reality, when FH arrived on campus less than 4% of alumni donated anything to the school. I believe the number is up to 17% or so (JSJ would know better). It's still far too little. The big donations help a lot, but it's the lack of a more generous alumni that would stand between a brand new on campus arena.