Avon Barksdale
Member
it's a double-edged sword.
we are not bringing in a Kentucky like freshman class that will carry us to a 25 win season and we dont have a solid foundation of underclassmen other than Jordan who can develop the way the Kennedy/Horne group did.
I am not excited at all about the DeLaRosa signing. I will support him, but I dont think he is a difference maker and he is not going to replace what we lost. The next Andrew Wiggins and Jabari Parker arent walking through the gates of the St. John's campus next year either.
We will be in our customary bottom of the pack finish next year, just in a small-time conference this timne around.
I agree with much of what you say above except for the term "small time conference". This small time conference sent 4 teams to the NCAA tourney this year and had St. John's and Marquette or Georgetown lived up to expectations, it would have been 5 or 6. A small time conference only sends one team every year, the automatic qualifier.
As for recruits, there are schools that will always attract the top players regardless of the coach like Kansas, UNC and Syracuse. Kentucky is on a different level than all the rest and Calipari is in a recruiting class by himself.
Steve Lavin was hired for his name recognition and his supposed ability to recruit top players. He has had some success with attracting top rated kids but he has not been a good judge of talent that could blend with a playing style, which he has yet to define at St. John's. I, for one, have been critical of his long term recuiting since last year when it became obvious he was not targeting 2014 players that could have made a huge difference this year. A good recuiter NEVER takes a year off recruiting and that is what he did and now we are getting all excited about signing unranked players and possible transfers because of that lackadaisical approach.
The key to Lavin holding on to his job will be how many early commitments he gets this Fall. If he strikes outs, I think barring a 22 + win season, he will be reading the fine print of his contract.
4 NCAA teams, all were eliminated by the end of the first weekend, two of those teams, 2 and 3 seeds respectively, were dominated in their round of 32 games by lower seeded teams who had worse records but were in far superior conferences and Xavier was a no-show in the play in game. Maybe if Creighton and Villanova were in a major conference they would have been seeded accordingly on the 7-9 line, because that is what they were in reality. It was the worst showing for the Big East in the NCAA Tournament in over 20 years, and maybe EVER...I wonder if its a coincidence that the lower quality of play is a result of realignment and the "new big east"?
The early consensus pre-season picks for 2014-15 have Villanova in the top 20 and Georgetown around 40.
Hopefully it'll be different and the BiG East will be competitive, but with McDermott leaving Creighton, Cotton leaving PC, all the kids leaving SJU....do you think the conference will be better or worse next year?