Ray Morgan
Well-known member
For those that fancy themselves as recruiting experts, here is your chance to chime in. Although he had his faults, Looie put out a quality product almost every year. Although some good seasons followed, there was a gradual decline that started with Mahoney, and should have ended when Jarvis was replaced. But it didn't. Now we may be heading back down the slide again. So why couldn't a single successor continue to build on the foundation of a solid program that used to dance most years, with an occasional deep run? If Looie somehow drank from the fountain of youth and stayed another 15 years, would it have mattered, or did he retire as we were starting to decline anyway? Can we blame it all on the loss of the stipend? Jarvis and the scandal? Poor decision making at the top? Or was Looie just that special for the program that he couldn't be replaced, especially at the budget dollars the school was willing to spend. For those with the best answers, a book deal on "The Demise of Big Time Basketball at SJU" could be yours for the taking. Feel free to add your formula for getting back to being relevant.