Vaccaro is a phony? He praises STJ when they do something well, and writes a dead on piece like this when they stink the joint up.
There is nothing Vaccaro wrote that was not mentioned a hundred times in various threads here! As a journalist I expected some insight but there was none imo. In poo pooing the seniors performance in the Big East tourney he unfairly singles out these four as if they were the reason for losing one freaking game in each of the 4 years they played here or, since records don't lie, as he stated, for a total of 4 games in single round elimination games they played. We that have witnessed all 120+ games they have played know that they have been as much the victims of various circumstances as they have been protagonists in those few losses. They are victims of their own deficient skill sets, mediocre coaching and other factors. To try to define their legacy as losing 4 Big East tourney games disregards and diminishes their victories, not only over opponents but over their individual hardships and demons. We bitter fans react and write criticisms from our deepest emotions because of our vested interest in our team and for most, our alma mater. In the Big picture of LIFE losing 4 games in these mostly money making meaningless conference tournaments is not a legacy building experience worthy of op-ends by journalists as if to overshadow all the games they played and big games they won.
As we all know, by the time the conference tourneys start the majority of teams have been selected for what they justifiably did during the season. Only upsets in these tourneys change the seeding and selections. In lesser leagues teams like Iona get upset and the kids never even get a chance to have an NCAA memory. That should not define student-athletes legacies. It was very big of Mike Vaccaro to dump on 4 flawed seniors who had a supporting cast of 2 undergrads and nothing else after winning 21 games in one of the top 3 conferences in America.