Beast and everyone else on here, you are correct, sexual abuse(all abuse) of children is predatory and criminal and those who do it or enable it, deserve the most severe consequences. Period end of discussion.
However, if my 20 years of Catholic schooling (Kindergarden and Law) is anything to go by, I was not approached nor anyone I know, by any religious or layperson in any of those schools. My one perhaps, almost incident happened on a ski trip for Regis, and it would have been flat out ended. No doubt victims are often chosen because of their vulnerabilities and it may account for my not seeing it.
However, a couple of things to consider:
A Priest (or anyone) who is accused 15-25-30- sometimes 50 years later (and the only testimony is the victim), has a very hard if not impossible time defending himself, even if truly innocent. Go and try to prove a negative.
Some of the victims have other motivations, i.e., obvious one is money; but studies have shown they may be motivated by wanting to hurt the church as an institution or they may suffer from a mental illness that causes them to make things up. Lawyers have been known to approach and coach some people into remembering things that never actually happened. There are many layers to this.
Personally, I related the Fordham Prep story to explain the inability to grasp some of the stories we have heard of older students, some as older teens or young adults to claim abuse, when what may have happened is a consensual relationship gone wrong. One that could have been shut down, by en explicit NO, or physically leaving the situation. Now, the disparate power positions come into play, and all of that, so there is no bright line here. One case in NJ involved a 22 year old and forgive me, but he claimed the Parish priest forced him to have sex, but I didn't buy it. He got a big settlement too.
One last point, the % of pedofiles among Catholic Priests mirrors pretty closely the % in Protestant clergy, Boy Scouts, Rabbis, teachers, coaches, etc., etc. Power position people and youths, so the Catholic Church has a lot of company when it comes to rooting out this horrible evil. It is just the Catholic Church is one centralized place and these others are many times de-centralized, one or two-off places so it stays out of the limelight.
Interesting to note, nuns' sexual abuse (and female sexual abuse in general) is practically non-existent (comparatively), so the Catholic Church teachings that the female Catholics received I guess does not fall on deal ears. Same teachings.
BJR, based on everything that I've read and heard, the Jesuits in particular have had a disproportionate number of child abuse charges levied against them. Here's the prevailing wisdom amongst
me and many of my Jesuit educated friends; a large majority of Jesuit priest either were involved in child abuse, or knew it was going on and did nothing about it. As has been discussed before, the fact that you or I never saw anything-I've heard plenty of stories many years later, including one today about a now deceased Regis/Loyola priest-means nothing IMO. Remember,
for every 1,000 kids a priest encounters, they may molest 1 or 2. The fact that a priest is a pillar of the community (aren't they all), and has wonderful relationships with countless children and their families(don't they all), means absolutely nothing. Too many have been wolves in sheep's clothing, and have preyed on the most vulnerable. One only need Google "sex scandal amongst Jesuits" to find a laundry list of sex abuse(and much worse) cases. I have been researching a lot over the past few days, and the more layers of the onion I peel away, the more it stinks.
Just a couple of sickening examples:
[URL]https://www.adn.com/alaska-new...sts-to-retire-on-a-washington-college-campus/[/URL]
These are not isolated cases.