Rothstein Prognosis

Nova too high.

Disagree. I see them as either second or third with a god chance to win the conference.

They aren't better than us, Marquette, Gtown. Even Creighton could arguably be better IMO.

IMO they are as good as anyone in the league. Tough players too.

I completely agree. Pinkston is a monster and if he starts knocking down deep shots like I think he will, he could blow up. I think Nova really needed an explosive second guard and they got it with Dylan Ennis. Hilliard is a decent player, but they will be much better off playing smaller with Archie and Ennis. Bell is a very good player and extremely versatile and the young big (Uchefu? always get their names mixed up) should be much improved.

I'm actually partial to Hilliard over Bell, though both are good players. Hilliard I thought was an extremely smart player. Those 4 have as much chemistry as any group in the big east and I'd be surprised if they didn't finish top 3.

1. Marquette
2. Us
3. Nova
4. Gtown
 
Nova too high.

Disagree. I see them as either second or third with a god chance to win the conference.

They aren't better than us, Marquette, Gtown. Even Creighton could arguably be better IMO.

IMO they are as good as anyone in the league. Tough players too.

I completely agree. Pinkston is a monster and if he starts knocking down deep shots like I think he will, he could blow up. I think Nova really needed an explosive second guard and they got it with Dylan Ennis. Hilliard is a decent player, but they will be much better off playing smaller with Archie and Ennis. Bell is a very good player and extremely versatile and the young big (Uchefu? always get their names mixed up) should be much improved.

I'm actually partial to Hilliard over Bell, though both are good players. Hilliard I thought was an extremely smart player. Those 4 have as much chemistry as any group in the big east and I'd be surprised if they didn't finish top 3.

1. Marquette
2. Us
3. Nova
4. Gtown

I thought Hilliard at the two was Nova's weakness. He's a decent player, but he is not the explosive scoring threat you want sharing the back court with Archie. Ennis and Arcie will be a tough, tough duo that will penetrate and stick outside shots. Hilliard is a much better fit for the three.
 
Nova too high.

Disagree. I see them as either second or third with a god chance to win the conference.

They aren't better than us, Marquette, Gtown. Even Creighton could arguably be better IMO.

IMO they are as good as anyone in the league. Tough players too.

I completely agree. Pinkston is a monster and if he starts knocking down deep shots like I think he will, he could blow up. I think Nova really needed an explosive second guard and they got it with Dylan Ennis. Hilliard is a decent player, but they will be much better off playing smaller with Archie and Ennis. Bell is a very good player and extremely versatile and the young big (Uchefu? always get their names mixed up) should be much improved.

I'm actually partial to Hilliard over Bell, though both are good players. Hilliard I thought was an extremely smart player. Those 4 have as much chemistry as any group in the big east and I'd be surprised if they didn't finish top 3.

1. Marquette
2. Us
3. Nova
4. Gtown

I thought Hilliard at the two was Nova's weakness. He's a decent player, but he is not the explosive scoring threat you want sharing the back court with Archie. Ennis and Arcie will be a tough, tough duo that will penetrate and stick outside shots. Hilliard is a much better fit for the three.

Why are you so high on Ennis? Tyler got all the good DNA.
 
Nova too high.

Disagree. I see them as either second or third with a god chance to win the conference.

They aren't better than us, Marquette, Gtown. Even Creighton could arguably be better IMO.

IMO they are as good as anyone in the league. Tough players too.

I completely agree. Pinkston is a monster and if he starts knocking down deep shots like I think he will, he could blow up. I think Nova really needed an explosive second guard and they got it with Dylan Ennis. Hilliard is a decent player, but they will be much better off playing smaller with Archie and Ennis. Bell is a very good player and extremely versatile and the young big (Uchefu? always get their names mixed up) should be much improved.

I'm actually partial to Hilliard over Bell, though both are good players. Hilliard I thought was an extremely smart player. Those 4 have as much chemistry as any group in the big east and I'd be surprised if they didn't finish top 3.

1. Marquette
2. Us
3. Nova
4. Gtown

I thought Hilliard at the two was Nova's weakness. He's a decent player, but he is not the explosive scoring threat you want sharing the back court with Archie. Ennis and Arcie will be a tough, tough duo that will penetrate and stick outside shots. Hilliard is a much better fit for the three.

Why are you so high on Ennis? Tyler got all the good DNA.

It's not so much that I'm high on Ennis as the glaring weakness I saw watchign Nova. Two guards that can handle the ball, penetrate, and shoot are really tough.
 
Back
Top