Fortunately, we have an improved Greene. The best man will be our starter the 2nd semester. I think Branch will be our starting PG. It is comforting to know that we will have an excellent back up.
Agree that Nuri was not a pure point. Nuri reminded me of a Marcus Hatten type player. Other than the game against us last year, I haven't seen Branch play. Hopefully he will be a good one.
I hope so also, MCN.
No recruit is a slam dunk but as I said before there are some questions about Branch .He was given the opportunity to play at A&M, as you can see by the video of the SJU game. After that,his playing time was reduced as the season progressed.
He had a very high turnover rate, and was non productive. It was only ten game but he was very disappointing.
A & M. never went into his reasons for leaving but playing time and pouting seemed to be part of the picture.
He visited SJU and didn't immediately climb on board until he conferred by phone with, his recruiting coach,,Mark Turgeon who previously had moved on to Maryland.
Turgeon couldn't assure him of a spot and/or playing time because he prioritized the Harrison twins who, at the time, seem to be Maryland bound.
Branched cancelled his visit to Maryland and joined us that weekend.
Among some of the reasons given for optimism about Branch is that he will be scrimmaging against Phil Greene. At A&M he had senior point guard Dash Harris to scrimmage with and that was little help, in improving his game.
It's seems that it's all about playing time with Branch. He wasn't getting it at A & M., so adios. After that, Turgeon , his former recruiting coach at A&M now at MD wasn't falling all over him . In the least, that's not a good sign.
To be fair, if you profile Branch, he is a top 60 player who was unhappy and transferred. He does have a ton of talent but how many times before has talent been marginalized by attitude.
Is it unfair to say that unhappy transfer students, to a significant percentage, carry baggage. This can be overcome, but my point is that it has a significance in underwriting one's performance.
Was Steve right in grabbing him---- of course, but in no way should we write his name in with ink.
The above is why to me he is a big ???.
Agree that Nuri was not a pure point. Nuri reminded me of a Marcus Hatten type player. Other than the game against us last year, I haven't seen Branch play. Hopefully he will be a good one.
I hope so also, MCN.
No recruit is a slam dunk but as I said before there are some questions about Branch .He was given the opportunity to play at A&M, as you can see by the video of the SJU game. After that,his playing time was reduced as the season progressed.
He had a very high turnover rate, and was non productive. It was only ten game but he was very disappointing.
A & M. never went into his reasons for leaving but playing time and pouting seemed to be part of the picture.
He visited SJU and didn't immediately climb on board until he conferred by phone with, his recruiting coach,,Mark Turgeon who previously had moved on to Maryland.
Turgeon couldn't assure him of a spot and/or playing time because he prioritized the Harrison twins who, at the time, seem to be Maryland bound.
Branched cancelled his visit to Maryland and joined us that weekend.
Among some of the reasons given for optimism about Branch is that he will be scrimmaging against Phil Greene. At A&M he had senior point guard Dash Harris to scrimmage with and that was little help, in improving his game.
It's seems that it's all about playing time with Branch. He wasn't getting it at A & M., so adios. After that, Turgeon , his former recruiting coach at A&M now at MD wasn't falling all over him . In the least, that's not a good sign.
To be fair, if you profile Branch, he is a top 60 player who was unhappy and transferred. He does have a ton of talent but how many times before has talent been marginalized by attitude.
Is it unfair to say that unhappy transfer students, to a significant percentage, carry baggage. This can be overcome, but my point is that it has a significance in underwriting one's performance.
Was Steve right in grabbing him---- of course, but in no way should we write his name in with ink.
The above is why to me he is a big ???.
Agree that Nuri was not a pure point. Nuri reminded me of a Marcus Hatten type player. Other than the game against us last year, I haven't seen Branch play. Hopefully he will be a good one.
I hope so also, MCN.
No recruit is a slam dunk but as I said before there are some questions about Branch .He was given the opportunity to play at A&M, as you can see by the video of the SJU game. After that,his playing time was reduced as the season progressed.
He had a very high turnover rate, and was non productive. It was only ten game but he was very disappointing.
A & M. never went into his reasons for leaving but playing time and pouting seemed to be part of the picture.
He visited SJU and didn't immediately climb on board until he conferred by phone with, his recruiting coach,,Mark Turgeon who previously had moved on to Maryland.
Turgeon couldn't assure him of a spot and/or playing time because he prioritized the Harrison twins who, at the time, seem to be Maryland bound.
Branched cancelled his visit to Maryland and joined us that weekend.
Among some of the reasons given for optimism about Branch is that he will be scrimmaging against Phil Greene. At A&M he had senior point guard Dash Harris to scrimmage with and that was little help, in improving his game.
It's seems that it's all about playing time with Branch. He wasn't getting it at A & M., so adios. After that, Turgeon , his former recruiting coach at A&M now at MD wasn't falling all over him . In the least, that's not a good sign.
To be fair, if you profile Branch, he is a top 60 player who was unhappy and transferred. He does have a ton of talent but how many times before has talent been marginalized by attitude.
Is it unfair to say that unhappy transfer students, to a significant percentage, carry baggage. This can be overcome, but my point is that it has a significance in underwriting one's performance.
Was Steve right in grabbing him---- of course, but in no way should we write his name in with ink.
The above is why to me he is a big ???.
Allnet, do you have some inside info about Branch pouting and Turgeon rejecting him at Maryland, because I haven't heard any of that? You are assuming there is an attitude component to his transfer, something I haven't heard anything about. In addition, branch had nothing to do with the Harrison twins recruitment. They aren't going to be around at the same time. That is a falsehood. There seem to be a lot of assumptions about Branch's character in your post and about him being a malcontent which I haven't heard anything about. To say he was nonproductive also isn't fair. He played half of 10 yearly season games as a freshman and decided to play for a different coach where he'd fit in better into the team's plans.
Agree that Nuri was not a pure point. Nuri reminded me of a Marcus Hatten type player. Other than the game against us last year, I haven't seen Branch play. Hopefully he will be a good one.
I hope so also, MCN.
No recruit is a slam dunk but as I said before there are some questions about Branch .He was given the opportunity to play at A&M, as you can see by the video of the SJU game. After that,his playing time was reduced as the season progressed.
He had a very high turnover rate, and was non productive. It was only ten games but he was very disappointing.
A & M. never went into his reasons for leaving but playing time and pouting seemed to be part of the picture.
He visited SJU and didn't immediately climb on board until he conferred by phone with, his recruiting coach,,Mark Turgeon who previously had moved on to Maryland.
Turgeon couldn't assure him of a spot and/or playing time because he prioritized the Harrison twins who, at the time, seem to be Maryland bound.
Branch cancelled his visit to Maryland and joined us that weekend.
Among some of the reasons given for optimism about Branch is that he will be scrimmaging against Phil Greene. At A&M he had senior point guard Dash Harris to scrimmage with and that was little help, in improving his game.
It's seems that it's all about playing time with Branch. He wasn't getting it at A & M., so adios. After that, Turgeon , his former recruiting coach at A&M now at MD wasn't falling all over him . In the least, that's not a good sign.
To be fair, if you profile Branch, he is a top 60 player who was unhappy and transferred. He does have a ton of talent but how many times before has talent been marginalized by attitude.
Is it unfair to say that unhappy transfer students, to a significant percentage, carry baggage. This can be overcome, but my point is that it has a significance in underwriting one's performance.
Was Steve right in grabbing him---- of course, but in no way should we write his name in with ink.
The above is why to me he is a big ???.
MCNPA
Allnet, do you have some inside info about Branch pouting and Turgeon rejecting him at Maryland, because I haven't heard any of that? You are assuming there is an attitude component to his transfer, something I haven't heard anything about. In addition, branch had nothing to do with the Harrison twins recruitment. They aren't going to be around at the same time. That is a falsehood. There seem to be a lot of assumptions about Branch's character in your post and about him being a malcontent which I haven't heard anything about. To say he was nonproductive also isn't fair. He played half of 10 yearly season games as a freshman and decided to play for a different coach where he'd fit in better into the team's plans.
MOOSE:
Branch checked in with Turg but it just wasn't meant to be. At that point Turg was in flux with recruiting and had a backlog at the guard spots. Not sure what conspiracy theory allnet is coming up with. I give Branch a lot of credit staying with A/M and trying out Kennedy. He didn't like it and left. And that is different than Nuri leaving so please anyone spare us trying to tie their actions together.
Agree that Nuri was not a pure point. Nuri reminded me of a Marcus Hatten type player. Other than the game against us last year, I haven't seen Branch play. Hopefully he will be a good one.
I hope so also, MCN.
No recruit is a slam dunk but as I said before there are some questions about Branch .He was given the opportunity to play at A&M, as you can see by the video of the SJU game. After that,his playing time was reduced as the season progressed.
He had a very high turnover rate, and was non productive. It was only ten games but he was very disappointing.
A & M. never went into his reasons for leaving but playing time and pouting seemed to be part of the picture.
He visited SJU and didn't immediately climb on board until he conferred by phone with, his recruiting coach,,Mark Turgeon who previously had moved on to Maryland.
Turgeon couldn't assure him of a spot and/or playing time because he prioritized the Harrison twins who, at the time, seem to be Maryland bound.
Branch cancelled his visit to Maryland and joined us that weekend.
Among some of the reasons given for optimism about Branch is that he will be scrimmaging against Phil Greene. At A&M he had senior point guard Dash Harris to scrimmage with and that was little help, in improving his game.
It's seems that it's all about playing time with Branch. He wasn't getting it at A & M., so adios. After that, Turgeon , his former recruiting coach at A&M now at MD wasn't falling all over him . In the least, that's not a good sign.
To be fair, if you profile Branch, he is a top 60 player who was unhappy and transferred. He does have a ton of talent but how many times before has talent been marginalized by attitude.
Is it unfair to say that unhappy transfer students, to a significant percentage, carry baggage. This can be overcome, but my point is that it has a significance in underwriting one's performance.
Was Steve right in grabbing him---- of course, but in no way should we write his name in with ink.
The above is why to me he is a big ???.
MCNPA
Allnet, do you have some inside info about Branch pouting and Turgeon rejecting him at Maryland, because I haven't heard any of that? You are assuming there is an attitude component to his transfer, something I haven't heard anything about. In addition, branch had nothing to do with the Harrison twins recruitment. They aren't going to be around at the same time. That is a falsehood. There seem to be a lot of assumptions about Branch's character in your post and about him being a malcontent which I haven't heard anything about. To say he was nonproductive also isn't fair. He played half of 10 yearly season games as a freshman and decided to play for a different coach where he'd fit in better into the team's plans.
MOOSE:
Branch checked in with Turg but it just wasn't meant to be. At that point Turg was in flux with recruiting and had a backlog at the guard spots. Not sure what conspiracy theory allnet is coming up with. I give Branch a lot of credit staying with A/M and trying out Kennedy. He didn't like it and left. And that is different than Nuri leaving so please anyone spare us trying to tie their actions together.
ALLNET:
Branch checked in with Turg and it wasn't meant to be because the Harrison twins were coming in 2013 and Branch would only start or get significant playing time, at best, for half of a season.
If you research the entire Branch leaving A&M history, you will read everything that I wrote is not my own personal concoction.. When you give Branch a great deal of credit for leaving after six months it is really heavy and distorted spin.
He was not getting playing time, he averaged 1.3 turnover per every three of his possessions. He was an unhappy camper. You give him credit for leaving, Come on ! He bailed. His playing time was less and less and he knew a top point guard was coming in, and he chose not to compete.
He still may be successful but before you go off and say I'm creating something, do some research on the subject.
I understand that you want Branch to be successful but if there are negatives about him, don't jump all over me just because you don't want to read the truth. Try and be objective.
My main thrust here is that we shouldn't put all our eggs in his basket because there could be problems.
Google Branch, Turgeon, the Harrisons, all of the pertinent articles about Branch leaving A &M and then make accusations if you think they are accurate.
When Branch left A&M the school handled it in a very dignified way. Coach Kennedy had come down with Parkinson's and it was a very sad time there. It was a time for the school to keep away from any acrimony.
Even so, stories leaked through about pouting and being unhappy. Branch did finish his academic part and they praised him for that..
Branch left because he saw no playing time future there and you might blame the coaches at A &M for that, if you desire to give Branch the benefit of the doubt. I think you're a sucker if you're googling
.Don't you think that there is a possibility that Branch, the player could have been, a major part of the problem, or is it too painful for you to entertain that thought.
OUR TEAM CAN DO NO WRONG !
I think Allnet has made some valid points and I do seem to remember reading back in December that Branch wasnt getting the playing time he wanted
Hate to pull a Baldi but hot off the presses-Devonta Pollard scout 25th ranked recruit of 2012 and a Mickey D's all-american just committed to Bama over Texas, Missouri and G'town so I guess the happy St J's angle is at least he didn't sign with G'town all though I know some of you advocate strong BE non football schools.