Nothing is going to change and there are few reasonable expectations unless our coach changes his fundamental approach. He talks about "the maturation of the group". The group doesn't need to mature - he needs to. His usage of Greene is one of the most egregious cases of petty favoritism I have ever seen beyond the coach's son in 5th grade. This is supposed to be bigtime college hoops.
In 4 Big East games Greene has 16 points, 4 rebounds, and 1 assist...total. 3 games with no assists and 2 games with no rebounds. He's averaging 20.5 MPG in those contests. His minutes are empty, he brings nothing to the table save the occassional scoring streak but hasn't scored double digits in a month. Yet he's started 14 games this season. He registered 15 minutes last night and his contribution was a steal and 2 fouls, the latter of which on some bizarre offense/defense sub in the last few minutes where Greene ended up on Melvin and Melvin made both free throws.
To always argue how Greene negatively impacts Branch is an insult to Branch. We could argue why Marco or Felix aren't getting Greene's minutes. But if we are on Branch as it relates to our coach's blinders to him, did anyone watching that game last night think Branch should have played the least minutes of the 10 players who checked in for SJU? I didn't, the announcers didn't, and I'm sure most don't.
Our coach did, despite the fact that Branch had 3x more assists in 10 minutes last night than his boy Greene has in conference play. We want to talk about executing coaching basics the rest of the season, i.e. identifying the players who are making your team go, then we can talk about expectations. With Branch and Jordan we actually have a chance to facilitate some playmaking. But until basic, fundamental coaching strategy changes we're just banging our heads against the wall talking about expectations, because little if anything is going to change with the illogical evaluation of our own talent we currently employ.