Want to add one more thing. The 81-82 Duke team won 10 games. The 82-84 team won 11 games with a team that featured Dawkins, Amaker, Bilas, Alarie, Henderson, etc. I am sure that the Duke fan base expected much more improvement than 1 victory, and were likely calling for K's head. We know how that turned out. Which brings me back to my original point, which is that Rome wasnt built in a day, and that we are in very good hands with this staff. Lets not hang on every win/loss in an effort to determine if Chris if can be a successful head coach. We'll have our answer in due time.
Wins and losses don't make a good coach. There are great coaches who never won much, and lousy ones who won a lot but not enough.
There is a great interview of John Wooden by Charlie Rose. Rose asked Wooden if he agreed with those who proclaim him the greatest coach in basketball history. Wooden scoffed at the notion, and said with conviction "I am no where close to being the best coach ever in basketball. It is far more likely that better coaches exist across America, in high school gyms in places you've never heard of, who never receive much acclaim, who are far better than me."
While winning doesn't make a good coach, the absence of winning when you don't have the horses doesn't necessarily absolve you.
Agreed, but at this level a coach is measured first and foremost by wins and losses. That's why I said "Lets not hang on every win/loss in an effort to determine if Chris is a successful coach". Few have ever considered Boeheim to be a "great" coach. However he is one of the more successful coaches of all time. Here's all Chris needs to do:
1) get the kids
2) keep a strong staff, with special emphasis on a top notch recruiter
3) have a game plan in place on both ends
4) get the kids to play hard
5) get the kids to play as a cohesive unit
If he can accomplish those 5 things, he'll be consistently successful here. Not saying he'll be a "great" coach, just saying that IMO he'll be a successful one.