i don't know how anyone can say leaving the program needing nine scholarship players at once is better than what it was by any standard.
I think that you (and Jarvis) are the only guys who think that Roberts left the program in worse situation than Jarvis.
Don´t you remember the sanctions or less scholarships?
For a recruiter like Lavin to have 9 scholarships in the same year is not a problem, it´s a present.
I still remember when Jarvis said that he left the team in a better situation than when he arrived (Fraschilla firing)
I remember Jarvis saying that too.l I threw up almost immediately.
And newsie, what kind of roster did Jarvis leave in his wake for Norm? Exactly four guys who came to STJ on scholly as follows: the shell of Daryl Hill, Lamont, a broken Diakite and Tyler Jones. Oh and maybe Special FX, I think he committed to Jarvis. So Norm was pretty much faced with the same challenge coming in as he left Lavin going out. At least Norm left Lavin a year's worth of a full roster to work with. Inheriting a pile of shite and leaving behind manure is better than nothing.
(and yes I blame him most of all for Pittsburgh because if he hadn't been on work stoppage for two years before he was dumped he wouldn't have been fired in December and Pittsburgh probably wouldn't have happened so his wake washed away Grady, Ingram and Keita, leaving only the aforementioned players,a shattered image and NCAA violations).
The best thing that ever happened to Norm was Jarvis! The least succesful coach in the history of the program is still being given a mulligan by people by simply bringing up Jarvis. Norm was not lazy or crooked. That is the only positive thing you can say for him. While i think it is silly that people still bring up Norm and Jarvis at all, it is even more silly to keep defending Norm. Jarvis nearly killed the program. Norm kept the program clean but did almost make it irrelevant.
Nobody is giving Norm a mulligan. When he was hired the program was radioactive. Nobody wanted to touch it, with the school one more impropriety away from being turned into 40 years of wasteland. Norm was brought here because he would do as told, avoid controversy, and play it clean. Plus, the admin knew he wouldn;t abandon the program even if, by chance, he became a hot ticket and desired elsewhere. He worked hard, and did everything that was, or should have realistically been expected of him. Especially since, at that time, an honest program, and not the top twenty, was the real priority. Maybe his time here was too long, but Lavin's instant recruiting success tells you Norm took the radioactivity away.
My only issue with this is that if you brought in a Lavin type after year 3 or no later than after year 4 the program would be further along and we would not have had to sit through such ugly basketball. Or even if you had brought in a clean coach with any coaching or recruiting skill things would have been easier on the fans. Whatever, what is done is done.
Can't argue with that. Similarly you can't argue with the fact that if me Auntie had balls she'd be my Uncle . . . But she doesn't. How bad Norm was has little to do with the answer to the simple yes or no question, did he leave the program in better shape than he found it.