Curran had a great run, but don't think for a second that every move was honorable.
[...]
It's well known that Curran held a grudge against St. John's for not hiring him to replace Carnesecca when he went to the Nets ... Perhaps his Roberts referral was a sly payback to a program he came to dislike.
A couple of weeks ago I fisked a Steve Lavin post game interview. One of the comments he made related to his father's death. I spoke of the deceased barely in passing. My comments - directed at a living human being - were acclaimed as among the worst things that had ever happened on the internet. Your voice was conspicuous among those decrying my post, which was deemed so distasteful that it was sent down the rabbit hole.
Here Curran's body is not yet cold and you slander him as a cynic, an opportunist, and a liar; you add the charge that he was a dishonorable man; and append the insane theory he's a diabolical Machiavellian who waited 30 years to exact his revenge on Lou Carnesseca for some imagined slight by recommending to his own alma mater a completely unqualified head coach.
I note the stench of your hypocrisy and await the chorus of opprobrium.
Do you think Roberts will replace Self at Kansas as head coach? Big joke. Roberts is a bird dog for top programs, period. For programs that sell themselves, he can be the initial contact with a kid and his family, be warm and gracious, and express interest of Kansas in a kid. Not exactly a tough job. This allows a head coach like Self the ability to be a closer, to come in and seal the deal once the school is a finalist. Roberts can do this for a big time program, and this is the limit of his capabilities. He was over his head in every head coaching opportunity he ever had, and his records prove that.
I would credit you with not being able to read very well, but you would probably take that as flattery.
I repeat again that you have no idea, zero, zilch, nada idea what Norm does at Kansas. He was "associate head coach" for Self at Illinois and Kansas and I trust Self's assessment of Norm over yours. If that is the "limit of his capability" he has risen higher in his chosen profession than 95 percent of the people who attempt anything.
I do admire your ability to repeat the same chimeral facts over and over again despite all evidence to the contrary. Some people might think that that suggests a lack of intelligence but those people are mean spirited. I credit you your perseverance and self confidence. I do though prefer your earlier formulation of the bird dog theory. It gives a pretty clear indication of how you think and what you are.
"The fact of the matter is [Norm] was hired to be a bird dog, and for the most part be the African American guy on a staff that helps recruit African Amercian kids [...] "NR happened to be the Willie Randolph of college assistants."
Good day to you sir.