I never really thought about Mitchell and steroids. You are likely right, however he was already becoming a good player in 1986 as a 23 year old so it was still a very bad trade. Howard Johnson had a career year in 1989 also, so was he on steroids. Impossible to know. After McGwire's rookie year in 1987 it gets very confusing.Kent and Mitchell were clearly steroids. The Bay area is the PED capital led by the Stanford and Cal labs.
Even over the last 5-7 years the Giants have been able to get some very suspicious results from older players.
Tonight Is a good example. Peterson vs Fried.Highlights the problem with the Mets approach to pitching. This is a playoff team we have depth in the rotation. Question is who do we trust when facing a Dodgers or Phillies lineup when we are facing say a Yamamoto or Wheeler? Megill? Canning? Peterson? Manaea? etc. Mets need to answer that question or we might be facing a good but not good enough ending again.
Hojo’s stats are within a more narrow range over a longer time. He hit 36-38 3x followed separated by a slight dip into the 20s. He never hit more than 10 homers after his age 30 season.I never really thought about Mitchell and steroids. You are likely right, however he was already becoming a good player in 1986 as a 23 year old so it was still a very bad trade. Howard Johnson had a career year in 1989 also, so was he on steroids. Impossible to know. After McGwire's rookie year in 1987 it gets very confusing.