NBA Draft 2025

Maybe there’s a contingency deal in place between Utah and Brooklyn. Perhaps that’s why the Nets drafted so many players, particularly point guards.
Maybe 2 of these guys are ticketed to the Jazz. Maybe that’s why no teams dealt with the Nets for their first rounders.
I know that’s a lot of maybes. But that’s what conspiracy theorists do.
Or perhaps the Nets are poorly run.
 
Maybe there’s a contingency deal in place between Utah and Brooklyn. Perhaps that’s why the Nets drafted so many players, particularly point guards.
Maybe 2 of these guys are ticketed to the Jazz. Maybe that’s why no teams dealt with the Nets for their first rounders.
I know that’s a lot of maybes. But that’s what conspiracy theorists do.
Hopefully, because Nets had a weird draft otherwise.
 
We would have beaten Arkansas if we has Kadary for the last 8 minutes
Yes!!!!! Absolutely. That’s what happened. And CRP will make sure that we have depth that he can trust.
Even without Kadary, if Lefty hit just a couple of more shots….
That situation must have been overwhelming for Lefty. Even CRP will learn from that game.
Now, we should all move on. Even me. I’m sorry Mods.
 
I think most (not all) the euro or other foreign picks are stabs in the dark, and most don't pan out. So, I don't get when these teams try to look like they are smarter than everyone else by taking many of these foreign kids. Yes, the scouting of them is easier and more prevalent now. I'd much rather take a flyer on a kid like Dixon, RJ, Kadary et al than one of these other kids, mostly on hearsay. But that's just me...

For the record most college kids taken in the draft don't pan out either. It's a tough business.
 
You don’t think he’d be able to get a two way contract following next years draft?
Of course he could, but I don’t see a way he could have played himself into the first round at his age.

A year from now he will have the benefit of an NBA summer camp and at least 50 professional games instead of 35 college games and far less practice time. He’ll be a year closer to that second contract.
 
It was not disappointing, it was not only perfectly predictable it went as predicted by basically everyone in the business. So it was only disappointing for folks with unrealistic expectations.

The St John's kids will have an opportunity to play their way into the league or to make a living playing basketball elsewhere.

And NBA teams are not throwing darts at dartboards when they make draft picks, they thoroughly scout everyone, "maybe they didn't see enough of a kid who played in Australia or France" is farcical.
Is that why 18 teans invited RJ to work out pre-draft, because they knew they weren't going to draft him? So you think he flew all over the country in order to get himself a 2 way and forego at least $2 million in NIL this coming season?

An NBA 2 way deal is worth $578k, roughly 1/4 of what he would have earned next year, with far less visibility and exposure.

So even if that wasn't all true, who made you the king of emotions to state that this should not be disappointing for fans who rooted for RJ to get drafted, and for RJ and his family, who gambled on guaranteed NBA 1st round money and was completely shut out of the draft. If you think loyal Johnny fans were not following each pick, hoping to hear his name, or the name of one of our kids NBA scouts thought highly of, you are probably not much of a true fan or supporter yourself. There is a big difference between expecting one of our kids to get drafted and being disappointed that they weren't.

Each year we graduate around 3000 students. All are hoping to land great jobs when they hit the market. Many won't, some with marginal academic records, communication skills that need work, or lacking specific skills. Do they or their friends or family not have a right to be dusappointed, or does someone like you think because the result is predictable they don't have a right to be disappointed.

On the topic of nba being able to cover foreign players the way they can college players, I'm certain you are unaware that the nba requires each team to have a minimum of just two scouts. Most teams have 12 or less, and considering basketball is played extensively on 4 continents do you really think scouts are covering Australia, Europe, Asia, South America in person equally? Farcical some would say, but I would leave you to tout yourself in your own mind by diminishing other opinions.

At least a nasty former poster's opinions were generally well researched, and written like the attorney he is, even if he was an ascerbic ass. But that's just my opinion and others are free to disagree.
 
Back
Top