Mike Boynton?
- Thread starter mkras99
- Start date
[quote="mkras99" post=340715]Just throwing his name out there for discussion.[/quote]
Good thought, local guy with a lot of recruiting ties and a class act. OSU struggled this year, but a solid coach with AC experience regardless imo.
Good thought, local guy with a lot of recruiting ties and a class act. OSU struggled this year, but a solid coach with AC experience regardless imo.
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote="Paultzman" post=340721][quote="mkras99" post=340715]Just throwing his name out there for discussion.[/quote]
Great choice, local guy with a lot of recruiting ties and a class act. OSU struggled a bit this year, but a solid coach regardless imo.[/quote]
He is the definition of career assistant.
Great choice, local guy with a lot of recruiting ties and a class act. OSU struggled a bit this year, but a solid coach regardless imo.[/quote]
He is the definition of career assistant.
[quote="Marillac" post=340725][quote="Paultzman" post=340721][quote="mkras99" post=340715]Just throwing his name out there for discussion.[/quote]
Great choice, local guy with a lot of recruiting ties and a class act. OSU struggled a bit this year, but a solid coach regardless imo.[/quote]
He is the definition of career assistant.[/quote]
I guess we differ
Great choice, local guy with a lot of recruiting ties and a class act. OSU struggled a bit this year, but a solid coach regardless imo.[/quote]
He is the definition of career assistant.[/quote]
I guess we differ
Moose
Well-known member
[quote="Marillac" post=340722][quote="mkras99" post=340715]Just throwing his name out there for discussion.[/quote]
He was 12-20 last year.[/quote]
Forget Cluess and Pitino. If another guy was in the picture. Who would it be in Marillac's world. Playing by the realistic restrictions of course.
He was 12-20 last year.[/quote]
Forget Cluess and Pitino. If another guy was in the picture. Who would it be in Marillac's world. Playing by the realistic restrictions of course.
billthetruth
Well-known member
[quote="mkras99" post=340715]Just throwing his name out there for discussion.[/quote]
Anybody without a great record of head coaching experience and winning should not even be in discussion.
We are at a crossroads and falling into the abyss and can’t rely on just good recruiting reputation guys.
Mike Whoever and anybody else with a crappy head coaching record are a triple No No No.
Anybody without a great record of head coaching experience and winning should not even be in discussion.
We are at a crossroads and falling into the abyss and can’t rely on just good recruiting reputation guys.
Mike Whoever and anybody else with a crappy head coaching record are a triple No No No.
Last edited:
[quote="Moose" post=340730][quote="Marillac" post=340722][quote="mkras99" post=340715]Just throwing his name out there for discussion.[/quote]
He was 12-20 last year.[/quote]
Forget Cluess and Pitino. If another guy was in the picture. Who would it be in Marillac's world. Playing by the realistic restrictions of course.[/quote]
Marillac wouldn’t have fired and/or forced the resignations of Lavin or Mullin (or Jarvis).
Pitino is the obvious answer. I’m also fine with Cluess after this circus Cragg created.
Since they can’t be selected as per your rules, you have to get someone proven. Boynton has two losing conference seasons in two years and he went 12-20 his second year. He inherited a 20-13, 9-9 team.
Alford and Musselman would have been great. Howland.
He was 12-20 last year.[/quote]
Forget Cluess and Pitino. If another guy was in the picture. Who would it be in Marillac's world. Playing by the realistic restrictions of course.[/quote]
Marillac wouldn’t have fired and/or forced the resignations of Lavin or Mullin (or Jarvis).
Pitino is the obvious answer. I’m also fine with Cluess after this circus Cragg created.
Since they can’t be selected as per your rules, you have to get someone proven. Boynton has two losing conference seasons in two years and he went 12-20 his second year. He inherited a 20-13, 9-9 team.
Alford and Musselman would have been great. Howland.
Moose
Well-known member
[quote="Marillac" post=340746][quote="Moose" post=340730][quote="Marillac" post=340722][quote="mkras99" post=340715]Just throwing his name out there for discussion.[/quote]
He was 12-20 last year.[/quote]
Forget Cluess and Pitino. If another guy was in the picture. Who would it be in Marillac's world. Playing by the realistic restrictions of course.[/quote]
Marillac wouldn’t have fired and/or forced the resignations of Lavin or Mullin (or Jarvis).
Pitino is the obvious answer. I’m also fine with Cluess after this circus Cragg created.
Since they can’t be selected as per your rules, you have to get someone proven. Boynton has two losing conference seasons in two years and he went 12-20 his second year. He inherited a 20-13, 9-9 team.
Alford and Musselman would have been great. Howland.[/quote]
So after all the you typed Howland is only 'realistic' name and it's only because he didn't just take a new job.
He was 12-20 last year.[/quote]
Forget Cluess and Pitino. If another guy was in the picture. Who would it be in Marillac's world. Playing by the realistic restrictions of course.[/quote]
Marillac wouldn’t have fired and/or forced the resignations of Lavin or Mullin (or Jarvis).
Pitino is the obvious answer. I’m also fine with Cluess after this circus Cragg created.
Since they can’t be selected as per your rules, you have to get someone proven. Boynton has two losing conference seasons in two years and he went 12-20 his second year. He inherited a 20-13, 9-9 team.
Alford and Musselman would have been great. Howland.[/quote]
So after all the you typed Howland is only 'realistic' name and it's only because he didn't just take a new job.
Mike Boynton won 21 games in his first year at Oklahoma State. The team struggled last year. However, he is a local person who has recruited nationally. From what I hear, a lot of local AAU coaches would support him. I have also heard that he would be interested in coming to St Johns.
I would rather have a young hungry coach who is willing to work hard to build a program, than a Mid Major coach who has been successful elsewhere. With the right assistants, I believe that he could do a very good job here.
I would rather have a young hungry coach who is willing to work hard to build a program, than a Mid Major coach who has been successful elsewhere. With the right assistants, I believe that he could do a very good job here.
[quote="panther2" post=343173]Mike Boynton won 21 games in his first year at Oklahoma State. The team struggled last year. However, he is a local person who has recruited nationally. From what I hear, a lot of local AAU coaches would support him. I have also heard that he would be interested in coming to St Johns.
I would rather have a young hungry coach who is willing to work hard to build a program, than a Mid Major coach who has been successful elsewhere. With the right assistants, I believe that he could do a very good job here.[/quote]
Thanks, Panther. Wtf is Boynton not on the list then? James Jones and Frank Haith over him? Come on...Frank Haith is terrible and is one more season away from being fired by Tulsa for #%#$%'s sake.
I would rather have a young hungry coach who is willing to work hard to build a program, than a Mid Major coach who has been successful elsewhere. With the right assistants, I believe that he could do a very good job here.[/quote]
Thanks, Panther. Wtf is Boynton not on the list then? James Jones and Frank Haith over him? Come on...Frank Haith is terrible and is one more season away from being fired by Tulsa for #%#$%'s sake.