MainMan post=453410 said:Yeah, not a high-level talent....
Trade him?Mean Gene post=453411 said:MainMan post=453410 said:Yeah, not a high-level talent....
He’s a high level talent but if he wants to be considered among the top point Guards in College Basketball he has to develop a consistent jump shot. If he can’t do that then he can’t be considered among the best no matter good his defense is or how high of a motor he has.
Mean Gene post=453411 said:MainMan post=453410 said:Yeah, not a high-level talent....
He’s a high level talent but if he wants to be considered among the top point Guards in College Basketball he has to develop a consistent jump shot. If he can’t do that then he can’t be considered among the best no matter good his defense is or how high of a motor he has.
+1,000, and a sophomore to bootlawmanfan post=453417 said:Dude, I am not here for Posh Alexander slander. I am sure you can find sexier point guards out there, guys who shoot better from deep, guys who are in different systems or who have different skills. You go do that if you want.
What I can tell you after a half-century of watching college basketball is that I have never in my life seen a kid play harder every second of every game, never seen a player with more heart (possible exception of Anthony Glover) and have rarely seen anyone as committed to defense or more valuable to his team.
You can definitely nitpick about the jump shot, maybe the handle at times and the limited use of the left hand. Go find me a player who you can't nitpick something about, lottery picks included.
It isn't all stats and articles - you have to watch the game with your eyes, also.
After many years on this site the unrelenting negativity of our fan base rarely surprises me. But I am honestly shocked that anyone who is a fan of this program would fail to recognize that Posh will go down as one of the greats here, even if it doesn't show up as much in some parts of the stat column.
Mean Gene post=453411 said:MainMan post=453410 said:Yeah, not a high-level talent....
He’s a high level talent but if he wants to be considered among the top point Guards in College Basketball he has to develop a consistent jump shot. If he can’t do that then he can’t be considered among the best no matter good his defense is or how high of a motor he has.
congratulations Posh
agree against the hall. He passed up mid range shots. Need to hit those
lawmanfan post=453417 said:Dude, I am not here for Posh Alexander slander. I am sure you can find sexier point guards out there, guys who shoot better from deep, guys who are in different systems or who have different skills. You go do that if you want.
What I can tell you after a half-century of watching college basketball is that I have never in my life seen a kid play harder every second of every game, never seen a player with more heart (possible exception of Anthony Glover) and have rarely seen anyone as committed to defense or more valuable to his team.
You can definitely nitpick about the jump shot, maybe the handle at times and the limited use of the left hand. Go find me a player who you can't nitpick something about, lottery picks included.
It isn't all stats and articles - you have to watch the game with your eyes, also.
After many years on this site the unrelenting negativity of our fan base rarely surprises me. But I am honestly shocked that anyone who is a fan of this program would fail to recognize that Posh will go down as one of the greats here, even if it doesn't show up as much in some parts of the stat column.
Mean Gene post=453411 said:MainMan post=453410 said:Yeah, not a high-level talent....
He’s a high level talent but if he wants to be considered among the top point Guards in College Basketball he has to develop a consistent jump shot. If he can’t do that then he can’t be considered among the best no matter good his defense is or how high of a motor he has.
SJU85 post=453413 said:Mean Gene post=453411 said:MainMan post=453410 said:Yeah, not a high-level talent....
He’s a high level talent but if he wants to be considered among the top point Guards in College Basketball he has to develop a consistent jump shot. If he can’t do that then he can’t be considered among the best no matter good his defense is or how high of a motor he has.
While it was a different era and he was not the defender Posh is (although he had quick hands) Pearl Washington, who never had a jump shot either was considered among the best point guards and was a first round pick.
Dan V post=453441 said:Well deserved not a PG in the country I would take over him. Literally the perfect fit for what Mike Anderson is all about. Not an elite offensive player but knows how to play to his strengths. His motor, leadership and intangibles are off the charts, much rarer to find than a scoring guard which are dime a dozen. Fellow Brooklyn native to boot doesn’t get much better than that.