''If we were down three that's a great shot, but honestly we should've gone to the hoop, in the heat of the moment though, I can see why he shot was thrown up, we didn't lose the game on the final possession, we lost it on the final 4 possessions.
No that was a great shot and should have been taken. Why should we have gone to the hoop, because it didn't go in? We hadn't gotten a decent look or run efficient offense in 5 minutes but we should pass up a wide open look by our "best" shooter with the clock running down? No way, that's just a massive second guess because it didn't go in.
It's not a second guess, it's a thought because we were down by ONE, and a shot closer to the rim is a higher percentage shot and also has a better possibility of causing a foul. Also depauls defense was not set so even though we hadn't gotten a good inside look down the stretch in our half court offense, in the fast break we definitely could've.
Lavin said after the game he would've liked something closer to the hoop, and it's one of the things he's said that I actually do agree with.
Do not blame Lavin you 1st have to have players that can get the ball closer to the rim We have a bunch of over-rated players Yes Lavin picked them but based of their body of work in HS WE can salvage this yr if we win the Big east title then advance to the sweet 16 lol It will be difficult but we just have to try to enjoy the rest of the season